Jump to content

njbuff

Community Member
  • Posts

    11,935
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by njbuff

  1. 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

     

    Correct, the IG isn't a prosecutor. He's an internal watchdog that gives evidence to the prosecutors. There are also numerous ways in which his report can be kept hidden. 

     

    I expect Sessions and his DOJ to indict numerous people as a result of the IG's findings. How quick the turnaround will be is anyone's guess. There's a lot of talk of a second SC to handle all that - but I think that's overkill. It would start the investigation over in a sense. Horowitz has been interviewing witnesses that neither congressional committee has had a chance to (this is evidenced in multiple letters from these committees) for months. He's collected evidence for over a year. My point being that the collection of evidence that a new SC would do is already done. 

     

     

    Also correct to a degree. My stance on Mueller IS speculation and controversial at that. I fully admit that and am willing to be wrong on that front. But if my theory on Mueller holds water, then yes what you laid out is accurate. Mueller is needed to clear Trump publicly - which will then free the DOJ and Sessions to act on whatever Mueller did find on people like Manafort and Pap (both plants). 

     

    I'll say this though... the drive to investigate Hillary or Obama can't come from Trump directly. Even if it's righteous, having it come from Trump will color it with partisanship that will allow the media and others to dismiss it as political retribution. That's why, to me, the "fight" with Sessions has been done so publicly. They are trying to engineer the illusion that Sessions and Trump are at odds. That Sessions isn't a Trump sycophant. That way, when Sessions announces his findings of the investigations which are already ongoing and they're bad for 44 and HRC, it can't be written about as Sessions just being Trump's puppet. 

     

    Remember. This is a massive scandal. It's the biggest scandal in the history of world politics, not just this country. It really is. Sessions and Trump only get ONE CHANCE to bring it all down. Any misstep and everyone of the big fish swims free from the net. That's why there is so much theater going on. 

     

    :beer: 

     

     

    MSM and the left see this as one big right wing conspiracy.

     

    That's why they wanna shut down FOX and all the other right wingers.

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

     

    I was skeptical about them going after 44 and HRC directly for months. 

     

    Lately I've started to change my stance on that. Trump is making it clear with his tweets that Obama is not going to be given a pass. Horowitz has been waiting four years to properly investigate Obama's Justice Department - and he's been hard at work for over a year collecting evidence. 

     

    We'll have a clearer sense of who the real targets are going to be when the IG report hits. Rumors started yesterday that the IG report is going to be very bad for McCabe. His hands were in a lot of dirty Obama pies during his tenure. 

     

    My position now is that 45 is going to bring them all down. There's no other reason for him to keep reminding folks about the Iran deal which was treasonous on numerous levels. Sessions is already investigating the Hezbollah network Obama allowed to grow inside the US as well as the handling of the email investigation as well as the Russian collusion narrative (which is really about the DNC and 44's administration much more so than it is about Trump's). 

     

    The wheels are in motion. But it's going to take time. :beer: 

     

    By what you are saying, you think Trump is waiting for Mueller to end his investigation and clearing Trump............... then Trump himself will order Sessions (and whoever else) to go hard after Obama and Hillary.

     

    And if that's the case..................... Let the games begin.

  3. 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

     

    I know! I know! 

     

    He needs to play defense because he's facing the threat of potential prosecution for multiple felonies. 

     

    Who's gonna try and take Obama and his incompetent hacks down?

     

    Does anyone have the balls to do it?

     

    I know a guys like Levin and Hannity talk a good game, but who actually has the guts to bring them all down?

  4. 3 minutes ago, row_33 said:

     

    it's your shift to take on the 5 or so liberal wack-jobs....

     

     

     

    Liberal hacks exist in my immediate family, so I am used to it.

     

    It's pretty bad.

     

    I just wanna stick to Bills related stuff and watching my Devils choke away a playoff spot, but my family makes it impossible.

  5. 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

     

    I'd posit the confusion cuts to the core of our disagreements in the past. This isn't a partisan divide we're seeing - it's not just Obama flunkies clinging to power. It's much deeper and nefarious. The battle lines aren't R v D or even C v L. It's far more systemic. There has been a massive changing of the guard in power players behind the scenes going on now for over a year - most of which will never be covered in full. The result is lots of people who were formerly protected are now exposed. 

     

    The puppets had their strings cut months ago - four months ago now to be exact - the fallout we are seeing is what happens when the puppets lose the financial cover of their masters. They can't stop a lawsuit anymore. They can't rig the system. 

     

    They've been cut loose. 

     

    Hence the panic.

     

    I think the top one was Foster who was shot twice in the head in a "suicide". :beer:

     

    But the rest yeah. There's a lot that doesn't add up unless you are willing to entertain other possibilities besides a robbery gone wrong.

     Sorry, I got my facts wrong.

     

    How many times was Rich shot agin?

  6. 1 minute ago, garybusey said:

     

    It's a relevant political topic. What forum do you think this thread should be in?

     

    Only the resistance cares about Kushner.

     

    Non political folks and Trump supporters care nothing about Kushner. Never have, never will.

     

    If folks like you wanna keep up the Kushner rhetoric, that's fine, but most people could care less.

  7. 33 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    The President might be a traitor who is subverting our democracy and partisans don't cares. Never had a president this bad on so many levels. That's a non-partisan position 

     

    I didn't know Obozo was still in office.

     

    Trump on his worst day is better than Obozo was on his best day. And I am no Trump supporter. I just know how bad Obama was. And I am hardly alone in saying that Obama was the worst President this country has ever seen.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  8. Don't you folks remember that we were told that Seth Rich was such a good marksman that he shot himself in the head............ TWICE.

     

    Others say he was killed during a robbery, yet nothing was taken.

     

    And Seth Rich's family told Hannity to keep his mouth shut.

     

    Oh yeah, this mystery isn't fishy in the least.

  9. Funny, going into 2017 I loved Josh Allen and did not like Lamar Jackson as NFL prospects.

     

    Now, my opinion has taken a 180.

     

    I have a feeling now that if the Bills love Jackson they are going to have to trade up for him.

     

    There is a very good possibility that the top 6 QB's will go before the Bills pick at 21.

  10. 6 minutes ago, JM57 said:

    Daboll has already shown he can, and will, do this. You can look at the National Championship game alone and see it. Same scheme, of course, but with different wrinkles that played to the strengths of Jalen Hurts (good runner, weaker passer) and Tua Tagovailoa. That's a good sign.

     

    Also a reminder that Daboll and Bobby Petrino both run the Erhardt-Perkins offense, so the concepts and terminology would already be very comfortable for Jackson.

     

    If Teddy Bridgewater is a free agent looking for a short term, prove it deal, I'm signing him and drafting Jackson.

     

    I could go along with this.

     

    Plus Jackson is light years more talented than Taylor.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...