Success

this guy is as good as Watkins? Awesome

We got 2 day 1 starters at positions of need. I'm good.

Tony Luke's - they bake their own rolls. But for overall experience, probably Pat's. And no cheez whiz!

I was really holding out hope garoppo would get traded yesterday. Watch bb franchise him next year. No one thinks he'll pay 2 Qb's that much, but I think he sees Jimmy as the future.

That's a pretty good flick. Not sure what you're trying to say here. Because we have drafted great cb's in the 1st, we should stop drafting cb's in the 1st?

Not a single premise there is supportable. Saying that the idea that this draft can improve the team isn't sane really defies logic. Because we got a great CB who nan start, and may pick up another starter or 2 today? Bad thread.

By some accounts I've read, White really isn't that far from Lattimore in talent, and as a 4 year starter is more nfl ready than quite a few guys picked ahead of him. How are we conceding the season by trading down for an immediate starter at a position of need, and adding another likely '17 starter in the process? That's quite a conclusion you arrived at there.

I completely disagree with the sentiment that the Bills concede that they're not a playoff team because of the trade down. No logic to it, at all.

Their schedule is brutal. Keep that pick.

Agreed, but they still overcome injuries better than just about anyone, and always have great depth.

Please expound. Literally, that is what the pats have done for years. It's why they are one of the best teams at overcoming injuries. But I'm interested to hear what case you can present.

Silly. Personally, I'm looking forward to our extra pick today, and having 2 first rounders next year. As well as a guy who might be pretty close to as good as Lattimore.

Gilmore wasn't worth what the pats are paying. Glad they didn't overpay him regardless.

The Internet age has really complicated drafts. Fans read mocks and watch YouTube for a month or 2, and it leads to a sort of false sense of who should go where, and who the Bills "should" take at a given position. It's just not like that. I'm not discounting that some may put in serious time and really know their stuff. But even with those guys, it's a small fraction of what scouts and decision makers put in.

Chiefs. Without hesitation.

It was for Deion Sanders too. That's literally the only major weakness that was consistently pointed out in scouting reports posted online.

He had some 1st round grades, but regardless, that was part of the reason for the trade. And as others have said, it's what the pats usually do. Better to have a few very good players instead of one great player.

Amen.

That sounds a little too certain. I doubt McDermott will give even one more thought to Foster, until the Bills have to play against him.

Can't speak for this board, but bbmb blew up when Darby was picked. And not in a good way.

To the critics - what do you base it on? Kiper's "big board"?

Sssssshhhhh.

Hard to complain about this pick. Fills a need, ready to start and sounds like a leader.

I'd be stoked. While it would be nice to have the kind of talent you can get in the 10 spot, it's better for us this year to make a minor sacrifice in quality for quantity. Lots of starters will be available in the 2nd and 3rd rounds.

Watch him get fired, and then Watkins plays 16 games and has a career year, Ragland, Lawson and Seymour all break out as star players, and we finally get great coaching and make the playoffs.