Royale with Cheese
-
Posts
25,901 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Royale with Cheese
-
-
3 minutes ago, Marty McFly said:
Since its a point about the QB leading this roster to points, you have to drop the ej manuel game vs the jets and then it shows we are top 10. Somesht like that. Meh
5 passes?? Wow. Wtf Dennison.
Got it.
-
Just now, bigduke6 said:
the only reason Taylor would want to stay is, nobody else in the NFL will give him a shot at starting. He took a pay cut last year to stay with this team, his agent knows the landscape, u dont do that if you have better options elsewhere. this is Taylors only shot at playing. and its coming to an end.
There's always Cleveland.
-
2 minutes ago, teef said:
i completely support tyrod, but am not a big fan if that makes any sense. he does some things well, but i'll be furious if he's in the long term plans as qb. if he's here next year while qbs develop, i'm more than good with that.
I agree with this.
Although I'm not sure why Taylor would want to stay. Benching 2 years in a row and showing obvious signs they aren't viewing him as a long term answer.
It took McDermott until Wednesday to name him starter after Peterman had 5 first half INT's. McDermott was still deciding after on which QB after that disaster.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Wayne Arnold said:
15th in score percentage.
This season? 16th.
So not top 7 right?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Wayne Arnold said:
On what planet were the Bills Top 7 in scoring last season?
they were #10.
-
Defense needs to play lights out and like they did earlier in the year.
If it leads to a shoot out, Tyrod needs to step up big time. We won't be able to run the ball and keep up with them. Taylor needs to be on fire and I'm really hoping that happens.
-
4 minutes ago, grb said:
Or let's say Dak was our quarterback. Check out how he's currently affected by a slight drop in talent, even though he's still got a way-better supporting cast than Taylor. Switch situations, Dak & Tyrod, and I wonder what would result? One clue would be to look at the fifteen games these past two seasons when Taylor had both Watkins and Woods playing.
The numbers : 63.6% comp. 8.25 YPA. 27 TD passes. 6 INTs
Pretty good, huh? The 8.25 number is pretty exceptional even without ...... wait for it ..... YAC !! That was the result the one time Taylor had a true pair of NFL grade receivers to throw to. This year? No number-one (traded away). A bunch of number-twos / slot receivers who have divided their time between being injured and (first half of the season) being a head case. LeSean McCoy is a wonder, but he's running behind a line which resulted in a 9yd game (Panthers), 21yd game (Broncos), 25yd game (Jets), 49yd game (Saints & KC).
Speaking of the O-line, I really wonder how Carson or Wentz are going to handle playing behind them in our hypothetical scenario. Do doubt their play won't be affected at all, right?
Or could it be Dak has a year of film and has been figured out a little more? is that not a possibility?
Can we take a look at Cam Newton in 2015. His leading WR was Ted Ginn after Benjamin went down? How bad was their offense affected without a true #1 WR? Lead the league in scoring?
His one game with Benjamin, a true #1, he had 56 yards passing and did not throw to him outside of the first drive. Deonte Thompson in 4 days can have a big impact but Benjamin can't after 10 days?
You don't think the defenses focusing on McCoy has anything to do with it? Keep Taylor in the pocket and focusing on stopping McCoy is the game plan against us.
-
Just now, ScottLaw said:
Last year, not this year. Last year.
What has changed between this year and last year?
Well then lets take a look at last year.
New England ran about as much as the Bills and weren't bottom of the league in passing and scored a lot.
Atlanta ran just a little less than the Bills (4 less attempts) and weren't bottom of the league in passing and scored a lot.
Pittsburgh ran just a little less than the Bills (4 less attempts) and weren't bottom of the league in passing.
Seattle was in the middle with both.
Oakland was top 15 in both.
In fact, Indy last year threw the ball .8 less than the Bills per game. We were 30th in passing, they were 6th. Cincy threw less than us last year, 31st in passing attempts but were 15th in total yards.
Problem is we are one dimensional. How many teams now have said "make Tyrod play QB" is the way to beat them? What does that mean to you?
-
1 minute ago, ScottLaw said:
Again, Top 7 in scoring.... WHEN YOU RUN THE BALL SO WELL AND SO MUCH AND SCORE POINTS DOING IT YOUR PASSING OFFENSE IS GOING TO BE RANKED LOW.
Common sense.??
Common sense?
The Eagles currently runs the ball more than the Bills. Their passing offense isn't ranked low and scores more than the Bills.
Minnesota currently runs the ball more than the Bills. Their passing offense isn't ranked low and scores more than the Bills.
The Rams currently runs the ball as much as the Bills. Their passing offense isn't ranked low and scores more than the Bills.
The Saints currently runs the ball as much as the Bills. Their passing offense isn't ranked low and scores more than the Bills.
The Steelers currently runs the ball as much as the Bills. Their passing offense isn't ranked low and scores more than the Bills.
-
Just now, TheTruthHurts said:
This is an accuracy thing. He doesn't miss those throws often. What he doesn't do is throw a wr open with anticipation and accuracy.
Yes I agree with your second part 100% but he also misses a lot of wide open WR. He leaves a lot of plays on the field and it's shown on film all the time.
-
Just now, Billsfan1972 said:
Goff missed Watkins by 5 yards and was intercepted if you want to go to that thread...... But yep call me a hypocrite if it makes you happy.
Not every ball is thrown perfectly, but it was a completion and an easy catch and positive yards. When they are bad passes that miss an open receiver and cost significant years that's a huge issue.
You are a hypocrite and an extreme one as well. You'll criticize every completion by Goff because it wasn't "perfectly thrown" but it's fine with Taylor. Not every ball needs to be thrown perfectly for Taylor but it has to be for Goff. Remember you admitting how petty you are?
You point out one pass by Goff? Wow.
Taylor has never missed a throw right?
-
Just now, TheTruthHurts said:
It was a rare miss. Wide open receivers are what Tyrod does well at.
No...wide open WR's are generally the receivers Tyrod only throws to. He won't throw it in tight windows.
That doesn't mean he doesn't miss open WR a lot as well.
-
Just now, oldmanfan said:
I guess I would ask why it matters whether you deem a win as impressive or not. Some wins are ugly. Some aren't.
I specifically put in the first sentence that it's a good win for the stat column.
-
6 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:
So now victories only count when they're impressive?
That's not what I said at all. Is that really how you took it?
-
1 minute ago, Billsfan1972 said:
It was a completion!!!!! A roll or a decent third down call and it is a first down and near fg range and 3 more plays.
Yes or no....was it a well placed ball?
You know how much of a hypocrite you are? You criticize Goff all day long for not placing the ball well where it's supposed to be but now with Tyrod it's fine because it was a completion.
-
3 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:
Don't see a fifth rounder amongst them....... BTW Moon was a victim of racism (as to why he wasn't drafted).....
Tom Brady was a victim of racism. He was a slow white guy and that's why he was drafted in the 6th.
-
Just now, Billsfan1972 said:
What plays did he miss...... And quit saying O'leary please...... He should have rolled for the first down.
Oh yea a nice sideline pass to Jones, who thought he's still in college and easily could have tapped his toes but instead ran ob for an incompletion.
You're saying the ball to O'Leary was a well placed ball? Why can't he just hit him in stride? Now you're blaming O'Leary for not rolling forward?
You're asking him to find which plays he missed, when we just watched a broadcast view so you don't get anywhere near the full development of the play, thinking he's going to have a definitive answer?
Just now, ScottLaw said:Not at all.
Its because our offensive coordinator blows and doesn't adjust his offense to the strength of its players.... along with McDermott loving Jauron ball when he has the lead.
Long ways from top 7 in scoring from last season.
You're right. We're not one dimensional. Our passing offense has been in the top of the league and not bottom of the league the last 3 years.
184.1 yards per game passing is towards the top of the league. The 201 last year was top 5?
-
3 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:
STOP IT!!!!!
A first round QB pick, sure....... Peterman is a fifth round pick.
Dennison handcuffed Tyrod.... Could any QB have thrown for more then 180 yards yesterday with the same playcalling?
Yes....a lot.
Tyrod is on his 3rd offensive coordinator and his production has been roughly the same.
-
3 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:
As I said numerous times, the Bills get a lead and then sit on it with ultra conservative playcalling.... and then when the offense goes run, run, pass and goes three and out Tyrod gets **** on by fans.
Yes by playing Jauron ball.
It's because we are a one dimensional offense. We have been for 3 years now.
-
1
-
-
Just now, mannc said:
I’m not convinced any qb in the league would perform much better than Tyrod has in this offense, with these WRs and this OL, with Dennison calling the plays and McDermott going full-turtle every time the team takes a lead in the second half. We got a glimpse last week of how other QBs might do in tyrod’s situation and it was not pretty.
We got a glimpse of what a 5th round rookie would look like....not every QB would perform like Peterman did.In your first sentence, you think if lets say Carson Wentz was our QB....he would average around 185 yards passing in this offense? No QB can be successful with Charles Clay, Kelvin Benjamin, Jordan Matthews, Zay Jones with Lesean McCoy in the running game?
2 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said:The throw to O'leary is actually a rare miss by Tyrod. He typically hits those. People calling that classic Tyrod don't know what they are seeing.
It's not a rare miss. We've been in the bottom of the league in YAC yards by receivers 3 years in a row.
-
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:
Absolutely embarrassing.
"Glad we won but.......the defense won that game."
"Tyrod did not help us win." Essentially.
Just a joke. What are we supposed to? Win every game 31-24?
Someone posted about the media yesterday. I don't know if it's the reason why are teams can't win. But I'm 100 percent sure we've got some of the dumbest fans on Earth and maybe it is why we really don't deserve nice things.
We get it. Tyrod ain't Aaron Rodgers. That can't be fixed today. There is no QB debate here. The Trent vs JP and Fitz vs whoever or Orton vs EJ or EJ vs Tyrod days are done. There is no freaking debate in week 12 of this season.
Just shut up about the obvious deficiencies of the QB and enjoy the dam win. We all freaking know we need to be better at the position.
My God that was embarrassing to listen to. Win in a stadium the Super Bowl teams never won at....the team saves McDermott by not quitting on him. We're the freaking 5th seed.
But but but Tyrod didn't throw a perfect ball to O'Leary. Ridiculous.
I don't think anything they said was wrong.
No we don't have to win every game 31-24 but our offense still isn't very good. Our offense has had 7 games this season where the offense has scored two TD's or less. 7 of the 11 with two blowouts where we got late garbage time TD's.
Defense won the game last yesterday.
-
2
-
-
5 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:
And Carpaccio, another one who supported the Peterman fiasco, cryptically mentioned Tyrod left plays on the field.
Are we going to continue mentioning the O'leary completion?
You don't listen very well. Sal repeatedly and I mean repeatedly that he wouldn't make the switch. It wasn't time until they are mathematically eliminated.
Then he heard grumblings that it could happen, then it did, then he gave reasons why. That's it.
-
26 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:
Had nothing to do with Tyrod.
Geezus.
-
A good win for the stat column.
But at the same time, the Chiefs are a pretty bad team so who is currently on a worse downward spiral than we were. We weren’t that much of a better team on the field so I’m not looking at the victory as impressive or anything.
Is anyone here really a Tyrod fan?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
How many of us have game film less than 24 hours after a game?
So since no one has access to it on a message board, in your mind that means he didn't miss anything?