Royale with Cheese

Can he do his commercials at Lucas Oil?

Yep!

That looks better than last years starting week 1 line up. I still think we draft a guard in day 1 or 2 to compete with Bates.

They could have had Allen....they could have had Allen. 2018 class has two busts, one meh, one limited QB and one great QB....we have the great one.

And Betty, when you call me, you can call me Al.

Yes it’s impossible. And don’t listen to Joan Baez because there isn’t an answer to how many miles either.

First of all, I specifically gave you an example of an objective stat. Somehow you missed it. Second of all, this debate is stemming from your reply in which you specifically say “we haven’t determined yet what is the best way to determine roster success.” But you want to know objectively who is to blame for no Super Bowls. There is nothing objectively that gives that answer. It can be debated but measured stat that gives you once answer to this. On a team of 53 players, dozens of coaches and FO personnel….there isn’t one objective answer.

How are you not keeping up with this conversation?

No there isn’t. Dude, you are confusing the hell out of this. Stats give you information. What an objective stat is “which coach has the most wins?” That can’t be debated. What would make it subjective is “which coach is the greatest of all time?” stats can support but doesn’t tell you who is the greatest. Do you see now? So this whole thread of who is to blame isn’t objective no matter how many terrible takes you reply with.

First, this is why they watch film. Several hours of film. Secondly, this isn’t Tecmo Bowl where the defense lines up and stays still. They constantly move, shift and disguise before pre-snap…not to mention they don’t run the same game plan each week and it changes mid game too. You don’t have a solid platform to use. You are talking about taking all human instincts out of the game which is ludicrous. No need to study film, you will just have a live software spitting out percentages telling Josh what to do. I’m sure he’s going to love his ear piece while the playclock is running down. ”Josh there in base, 78% chance a run play to the left will work. No wait, scratch that, the DL shifted now run play right…that works 91% of the time. Uh oh, the Mike shifted right…I don’t like that percentage. Lets go slants left. *****! The Mike moved back…that’s only 48% successful. Back to run right!”

Nope….and WTF. Stick to chess.

Dude….wtf

You keep wanting an objective answer for a subjective topic. 1959 laid it out perfectly and easy to understand but you don’t want to because you have a clear agenda. Subjective doesn’t mean it can’t be debated but you’re not willing to listen to any solid reasoning unless it gives a black and white answer on who is to blame. How many people are going to argue against you before you understand your logic is flawed?

I just can’t stop laughing at the OP trying to argue to take subjectivity out of this discussion but then every argument he has is subjective. WTF.

Im pretty sure IronMaiden doesn’t understand this.

Oh so it wasn’t the superior opponent who was the reason he won it….it was the inferior opponent making mistakes. I see how your mind thinks now. Statistical analysis isn’t subjective????? Okay, this is getting beyond dumb now. Im out.

Oh so now you’re being subjective which you are against. Which one is it?

If one of the best chess players doesn’t win the championship with all those winnable approaches…that means all those approaches are failures. This is your argument.

What a load of crap. Just because you refuse to believe this doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Luck happens in everything in life, sports and non-sports related.

Thank you for proving my point…

You’re not discussing performance. All you’re looking for is someone to blame and not listening to any reason.

100%.