Royale with Cheese

Seems our only big weakness is 3rd down...problem is its really weak. Whites worst play was missing the sack on Tua that lead to the 3rd and 14 conversion. How does Tua get away from you? He runs like an oompa loompa.

We didn't think you were lying.

Way to let us down.

Were you able to see if the Dolphins were in a Cover 2 or 3? This is Mahomes problem I believe with the deep ball…that defense. Mel Kiper wanted to ban this defense lol.

Remember how the 2024 Ravens defense started the season and how they ended the season?

Should I lose hope that you will answer my question about Tyler Robinson’a dad turning him in?

Cool. Go to the airport and say bomb and tell the Feds you are protected by Free Speech.

I mean they are pro-pedophile.

His parents are racist. It says they “prohibit” it. Let me make it easy for you. If there is a sign at a lake that says “Swimming is prohibited”….are you allowed to swim or not? Of course it was on air. I watched it.

LOL. My god you are thick. https://www.fcc.gov/broadcast-news-distortion What is the FCC's responsibility? The FCC has had a policy against "news distortion" in over-the-air broadcast (local TV and radio stations) news for over 50 years. Cable news networks, newspapers or newsletters (whether online or print), social media platforms, online-only streaming outlets, or any other non-broadcast news platform are outside of the FCC's jurisdiction with respect to news distortion. News distortion "must involve a significant event and not merely a minor or incidental aspect of the news report." In weighing the constitutionality of the policy, courts have recognized that the policy "makes a crucial distinction between deliberate distortion and mere inaccuracy or difference of opinion." As a result, broadcasters are only subject to enforcement if it can be proven that they have deliberately distorted a factual news report. Expressions of opinion or errors stemming from mistakes are not actionable. What are your thoughts on Jimmy Kimmel Black Face?

I posted the rules directly from the website and you don't know the definition of prohibit lol. It specifically states the rule. I mean what? Oh yeah, when you say "MAGA trope" it's a compliment. You are as easy to read as a Dr. Suess Book.

Dems: These illegals need to be able to stay here....just as long as they don't live next to me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl2GRTEqhlI

I can respect this. I just feel with the intent so clear, especially in a high level case like this and the sensitivity behind it....I think it's a violation.

@Trump_is_Mentally_fit

So that's insane. Like really insane. He is just saying that to keep his narrative and bravado. There is absolutely no way he is going to feel comfortable with an MS-13 human trafficker and domestic abuser (wife filed a restraining order against him). He is okay if this person lives by someone else, but not him. There is no way that is a truthful statement.

Well then it would go to trial. And the sides would fight. ABC isn't willing to one of their stars....at least so far. I have worked long enough that I know Legal got involved and they saw enough to where they said it's not worth the fight. Or simply, just simply, an Executive on ABC really didn't like that comment and wants him to remove. I think the intent is clear what he was trying to do. But if you don't agree, that's fine. I think we can rule out he was a MAGA. It wouldn't make any sense and this is from my perspective, last ditch effort to not want the accountability on the Left.

What a peaceful message.

LOL What does the word "prohibit" mean? Are you really arguing this? He was very clearly trying to mislead the audience. You he was too, you're just fighting the narrative. The harm is it takes accountability away from their rhetoric and their rhetoric is dangerous. The assassin had antifacist on his bullet, he believed Kirk was a fascist and he killed them. It's something the Left has stated the Red is for years. Well a deranged person believed it and then killed him. ABC Attorney's obviously agreed that Kimmel was in violation because he was immediately put on hold without a fight. This is one of their biggest stars and they aren't fighting for him. Think about that. Stop pushing a narrative. Whew....I was only mentioned once.

@Roundybout @Max Fischer Still waiting for you guys to answer my question if you wanted to live next to a criminal like this.

From FCC website: https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf "Broadcasting false information that causes substantial ‘public harm’ The FCC prohibits broadcasting false information about a crime or a catastrophe if the broadcaster knows the information is false and will cause substantial “public harm” if aired" Let me guess. Kimmel wasn't lying! This kid was definitely MAGA!

So in your mind, there’s just no way that they just feel the Red is a better party? You know the motivation of me, Im a guy who walked away from the Dems because of these dumb policies. Maybe Im lying?