Matt_In_NH

This is close

Yeah the defense has not been top 2 over the last seven years.

Von!!!!!!!!

Pick six upcoming. Let’s tip the ball DL!

17 points vs that defense for a half is pretty good

Not even close

Kelce is so washed up he does not need to be covered.

This defense is butter between the 20s

He looked like he did not actually know how to catch it.

The snowballs are not cool.

And Dodson supposedly has a torn labrum so he will not be 100%

It is also possible concussions are largely misunderstood by the general public

Only if you ignore rushing

Did you know this game happened a few weeks ago? Not sure why you would think San Francisco is the class of the league with that result. https://www.espn.com/nfl/game/_/gameId/401547622

The great Shannan just used two timeouts to get 2 yards for a first down. They used one to just try and get go to jump. Then another after the conversion. McDermott would be fried.

He can clear protocol at 6 pm Sunday and play at 6:30. He has not yet cleared.

I am pretty great if I do say so myself

I agree that hurts but why did you think he would play? He was ruled out early with a knee and has not practiced at all, this seemed like the most likely scenario. Jackson, Douglass, Elam will be the guys.

He was an OC previously and interviewed with the Falcons for their HC job previously in 2021. His body of work is not 6 games as OC with the Bills.

If it is not half a hard I dont think they should do this.

And the 23 million people who did generated more money for the NFL that some of the other games that had higher numbers which is the point.

And that will hold true for the rest of eternity.

That is interesting...Sunday had clearly better ratings, not sure why we conclude really strong numbers for the Bills game. On each day the 4:30 game outperformed the 8:30 game. It would seem to me the NFL lost some viewers by the game moving which explains why the NFL wanted to move the game to Atlanta to be played at the original time slot.

Talking heads get paid because they have an opinion they back up emphatically and will use whatever data they have to support it while ignoring data that refutes their point. Unfortunately that approach works and people love to respond to it and talk about the take as right or wrong. But in doing so it encourages more of the same. It’s like the guy I. The bar that just shoots from the hip with a string opinion. It’s an opinion and lacks substance but it gets a reaction and that pays.

There is no snow to clear before the game?