I agree with your concept here except that you have access to a large chunk of data online from people who are educated so you can kind find consensus among "experts" which is what most do who complain. My only point is you have access to more than just a tiny fraction but you don't have conversations, background, medical, ex coach conversations etc. You do have all tape, measurables' etc. When Beane chooses someone other than I expect, for instance Coleman when many thought he was much further down, my reaction is to ask myself what information did Beane and his staff have to make that choice over the others instead of "OMG how dumb". People think very highly of their internet research.