Jump to content

Matt_In_NH

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,643
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matt_In_NH

  1. All the players are interchangeable except Brady and Bellicheck. Until something happens with one or both of those guys, nothing really changes. Every year the threads come out that they are "vulnerable". Hopefully Brady declines fast due to his age, other than that, they will find a way.
  2. I remember that, still awkward. He is better when he quotes military leaders.
  3. I guess I am ok with it but it will once again favor teams with great qb’s. The most important position gets more important.
  4. If someone is willing to pay a premium you can do it no matter who you signed in fa. You also never ever say never for this. Always listen for opportunities to make your team better.
  5. This definitely seems plausible, the forums exploded over that news. It became "the Bills have to get to 2"
  6. 1. I would not assume a guy who has not signed will not get good money. 2. Remember Gary Barnidge?
  7. The performance of those guys is driven by the performance of the coaching and other players. Most notably the QB will drive Brown's performance to a large degree.
  8. so basically "go Bills" I concur!
  9. They always have a plan.......not all plans are as good as others and not all good plans work out. Ultimately this whole things boils down to Josh Allen developing as a passer or not. If not, it will just be another crew who got 2-5 years and failed.
  10. Roster limit is 90. I expect a few more fa’s. Probably more one year contracts. I don’t agree about zay
  11. You can make the same thread 365 days from now and nothing will have changed
  12. I think they could be, yes. I don't expect a noticeable drop off. What good is an all pro who does not show up for practice and meetings for week 17 cause he is butthurt about someone else being voted team MVP? More talent is better, I agree but there is also something to be said for guys who are selfish losers that can bring the team down because they are not committed. I absolutely think the Steelers will win 9 or more games next year, matching last years output.
  13. We aleady know....they are not that valuable when it comes to winning and losing games, especially lombardi's. There is lots of data out there. The QB is really the only position that affects wins and losses in a meaningful way when it comes to one player.
  14. Giants were awesome with the all pro last year!
  15. Yeah I guess I was not considering that with my response. My guess is when they signed him there were hoping his behavior would change and it probably has not. It was easier to trade him with his contract though. On paper you are right, we will see if they win.
  16. I have not seen Browns numbers but I dont think anyone else is giving Beasley the money Buffalo is.
  17. I think he just did what had to be done. Maybe some day fans will realize what teams have, great talent at WR does not equate to a winning team. Arguably the two best WR's in the league have been traded not because of cap issues, or that there is better talent coming up or anything. They were traded because they are selfish pricks and that is not how you build a winning team. If OBJ was a professional he would still be in NY. You have to remove the cancer in your locker room to move forward sometimes.
  18. So sitting out a year did not work out so well. Hope he pulls a haynesworth on the jets
  19. I would argue zay was better than Beasley last year. Or at least they had comparable stat lines but zay had significantly more tds.
  20. I am not excited by this.
  21. I hope not but then again they were interested in Antonio Brown
  22. Pitt is going to try and win SB's while they have a HOF QB, can't see this being a possibility.
  23. That is the price for a piece of ***** locker room cancer who doesn’t show up to meetings or practice for the most important game of the season. His production will go down
×
×
  • Create New...