If someone chooses Dak over Allen, whatever, I dont agree but I think an argument could be made. I'm sure no one on this board agrees with Dak over Josh but we are all biased.
I heard the audio of this argument and the my take on it is this guy has no clue on Josh's history, who he is and what his history is. The speculation is he gets good so he gets "arm arrogant" makes risky throws and cant adjust out of it. I find that absurd based on watching all of Josh's games. Josh has spent his first three years specifically working on his weaknesses. When he has had turnovers and bad decisions he stands up in press conferences and says " I need to not put the ball in harms way"....and then he improves in future games. Other than his first 6 games his turnovers have not been that bad, I definitely think one area he can still improve on is keeping care of the ball but mostly with fumbles and not INT's.