Matt_In_NH

There is a certain arrogance to this post that is kind of ironic. What Bills fans are snobs and know everything about winning now? And we feel bad for Pats fans who went to 9 SB's in 20 years and won 6 of them because they struggle for 1.3 years? I get it the Bills are turning into a great team and should compete for years to come but that is not a given. At the end of the day the Bills are a joke to Pats fans until they win the whole thing. Did Jets fans feel bad for BB and Brady when they went to two consecutive AFC Championship games during the Pats run and knocked them out of the playoffs? Then then went all Jets and sucked ever since.

I dont really get it, are you saying Darnold is outplaying Baker? Because that is ridiculous. Darnold is on pace for the same type of numbers he put up in NY. Except he has more rushing TD's which is probably not sustainable. Is a later round pick from that draft doing something somewhere?

That is two things in what, 4 weeks....DB all the way. What a loser.

Tell your fried to look at a calendar next time. Posted October 4 October 10: Bills at Chiefs. Since we "agree" you wont get too excited about one game, good or bad right, Are you still drunk? Go Bills!

Bug time third wheel in the backseat.

could

There is one more after that, it could involve Brady again and could render Dec 12 meaningless.

This is a recurring thread every few years. I am of the opinion that not every great offense or defense needs a nickname. When a group is high level for a long period of time and a nickname is organically created it works. Purple People Eaters, Monters of the Midway, Air Coryell, Kgun all worked. There have been a lot of great offenses and defenses without a nickname and that is ok. I would argue its the offense that could use a nickname. The various plays off Buffalo/Bison and cold weather don't do it for me...

Percy Harvin, the second time. Reggie Bush

This is. It really new. The cowgirls super bowl teams had quite a DL rotation.

75%pb. /thread

You can find the clip of Oliver hitting the qbs legs. He was not barely touched to me. However it was not a foul because mahomes legs were in the air which is part of the rule. Hit head or knees/below you are getting a flag. Agree in Clark’s hit, he drove his weight into Allen.

I think you are taking the #6/#14 a little too literal. If you prefer to rank QB's based on team points scored per game or team points scored per play or something, go for it. Not sure a lot of people will back that approach. You say Allen scores points better than anyone, is that true? I know the Bills are leading in points but what about the number of plays each player has had, compare to at bats in baseball. There are things out of a QB's control that affects points too, such as their defense, if you have a crappy defense that gives up long time possession drives you might not score as much as a team with a lesser QB who has the best defense. Rating and QBR are not perfect and never have been but they are useful, just not the end all. Those are based on stats. Stats are affected by many things. For instance, does QBR take into account that 3 of Allen's 5 games have been impacted by weather? Even though the Bills are the highest scoring offense does not make them the best offense ( I think you disagree), they are further down in yards which was not true last year. Do you think Allen's performance has been top 5? I ask that to a fanatical Bills backer so I will guess the answer is yes.....but compare his performance this year to others around the league and it is reasonable to say others have been better so far. Of coarse if you just point to the scoreboard there is no argument. Allen was not good in week 1. His completion % and yards per attempt are down. It has never been true the team with the highest scoring offense has the highest rated (or top 5) passer, that is an unrealistic assumption. r

Steelers

That may be true but his numbers have been down the last two weeks. He was seen upset that he was not going in on a key third down. I tend to think this is more than just gameplan specific.

Agree with you, force is irrelevant per the wording of the rule for the reason you cited. I did not catch his feet in the air during the game, I assumed at least one was on the ground. If I understand the rules (which I may not) you cannot hit the passer in the knees forcibly whether "on time" or not unless you are blocked into him.

Forcibly is subjective so that gets decided by the ref, not a Bills fan....I think it qualifies. But I agree on the feet on the ground aspect, initial contact happened with feet in the air. That is an interesting part of the rule, doubt the ref was looking for that.

I think the need is more long term than short term. Get it healthy then he can come back. If there is any question, he gets a third week rest after this week with the bye, my guess is he does not play.

I think Clark was guilty of RTP based on the bolded below. When they started with the enhanced RTP, the driving to the ground was a point of emphasis, you can make conact in the strike zone but you need to try and not drive them to the ground. It is tough to be a defender these days but I think Clark could have and should have eased off. I think it was a flag but dont think he is dirty or anything. The crew calling the game does not know the rule. https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-video-rulebook/roughing-the-passer/ A rushing defender is prohibited from committing such intimidating and punishing acts as “stuffing” a passer into the ground or unnecessarily wrestling or driving him down after the passer has thrown the ball, even if the rusher makes his initial contact with the passer within the one-step limitation provided for in (a) above. When tackling a passer who is in a defenseless posture (e.g., during or just after throwing a pass), a defensive player must not unnecessarily or violently throw him down or land on top of him with all or most of the defender’s weight. Instead, the defensive player must strive to wrap up the passer with the defensive player’s arms and not land on the passer with all or most of his body weight. Also, this is why Oliver was guilty A rushing defender is prohibited from forcibly hitting in the knee area or below a passer who has one or both feet on the ground, even if the initial contact is above the knee. It is not a foul if the defender is blocked (or fouled) into the passer and has no opportunity to avoid him.

I have not noticed AJ much other than the Dolphins game when he was a total beast. I agree with your sentiment though, its good to see the young guys stepping up.

Do you think the call on KC was also "ticky tac"? Both calls, Oliver and the one on KC converted drivers that eventually led to TD's. KC had an INT wiped off the board. Or do you see the KC as obvious and egregious but the call on Oliver was ticky tac?

Fans are way more biased than any officials. Holding (Defensive and Offensive), Pass Interference (Defensive and Offensive), illegal contact, late hits are all subjective to some degree so you get different humans with different interpretations in situations they are trying to see a lot in real time. They are not incompetent, they are doing a job that is really difficult. Are they are human and have unintentional biases sometimes when it comes to marque players/coaches? Yes probably at times that happens. There is no agenda to make the Chiefs win because they are 2-2, that is ludicrous and it would come out at some point...just like Grudens emails came out. Go back and watch games pre instant replay when it was commonplace to have a clear turnover called down by contact or a clear dropped INT called a turnover that absolutely changed the game. No one complains much about what is ruled a catch/not a catch like a few years back, they cleaned it up in the rule book with common sense. Officiating has gotten better over the years, not worse and its not close. What has also changed is expectations of fans, slow mo instant replay in high def, instant tweats and memes. Subjective penalties are a left over human element that are not easily solved with replay or new rule language, its part of the game. I agree with the OP, the gameday thread was hard to look at because of the volume of complaining about the refs. There were bad calls in the game, I agree. From reading the gameday thread there were dozens and dozens, probably hundreds of non calls against the Chiefs....on the flip side there were 0 non calls against the Bills.

Who do you waive to make room? Assuming you want him active on gameday, who becomes inactive now? This seems kind of random, I mean is he better than Moss/Singletary? Maybe I guess, could see arguments either way.....but even if you think he is, it's such a difference that it "puts us over the top"? Marlon Mack does not put the Bills over the top, I would not think he would be the guy to put any team over the top.

Against the Bills or not that was a thing of beauty

This is an interesting comment to me. Pretty much fans of every team "thinks" the refs favor the other teams and not their team. They can't ALL be right can they? I mean Bills fans are right, we all know that but most of the other teams fan bases are incorrect in thinking the refs favor their opponents right?