Matt_In_NH

Dude the whole country is really only interested in single game. That is why Thai gets interest. You think they are gonna sell you a bills game for $5/ week?

go relisten, starts around 51 minutes...

I am going to defend the OP. Did you actually go an listed to decide for yourself who was right? I did last night and the OP is much closer to what was actually discussed than the "refuter". I find it interesting you latched onto the the refuter post as being correct, probably because that is the answer you like better. Kirwan absolutely said he hears about Seahawks and Bills as potential teams that could be for sale next, the whole thing is hearsay from Kirwan so take it for what that is. The overall topic was the increasing value of NFL franchises and the recent sale agreement of the Commanders.....some owners are supposedly disappointed in the low amount of 6 billion. Kirwan went on to say that when the Bills were for sale last time, one group wanted to take them to LA and owners probably were disappointed that did not happen because it would have "exponentially" increased that franchises value. I disagree, you can go tot he App and replay. Kirwan clearly was talking about potential future franchises that may go up for sale and what he has "heard". He then also talked about some things in the past, two things can be true at the same time. The OP's take is a lot more right than this one.

I understand the premise, a few thoughts 1. Until Von Miller is playing at full rate, I think DE has be be downgrade 2. A lot is the same but some guys are aging for instance the safeties, at some point that starts to decline on the field. 3. It is not clear the perceived slight upgrades outweigh the downgrades, especially at MLB 4. RB could be an upgrade as is today. 5. The best path to improving the team through an improved defensive philosophy/in game coaching and Josh Allen making some minor improvements (mostly taking some shorter passes quickly on certain snaps). QB is upgradeable as good as it is today!

Or maybe it goes to Mcdermott and he should be drafting?

I think this is just you are infatuated with the Bills. No Mom thinks their own kid is ugly type of deal...

Like OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Did they build a new TGI Friday's next to Applebees? How do you choose???

All he has to do is go to spotrac and see where all the money is going, its not that hard. I mean yeah we can argue about if it is spend in the right places but they money is spent, the roster is packed with good players. There is plenty of help, the team is using every resource to make the team better all the time. The Bills are near the top of the league in void money and doing bonus proration. This is ridiculous in my opinion.

The big question is what happens once Terry and Kim pass. I think the inheritance tax situation will essentially force a sell. I believe that happened in Denver. Hope I am wrong....

This is something I thought of when she had her issue last summer. Terry is older, I think it is hard to pass it down due to taxes.....they could be sold sooner than people are thinking about.

Not all states, in NH you can register for either party day of primary and then go right back to independent after you vote. But you can only vote in one dem or republican. I do this....

Did they bring snow cleats this year?

Or you can share the circle urinal

They allow 20-30 fans but that is it.

he is not on the team technically

I live in NE and I watched NE fans do that in real time. It was soooooooooooooooooooo annoying.

Lock the thread because its full of clowns who overreact to any little comment is more like it.

7 TE's in that list.....guessing we will see one of them next year.

Ebay did not exist during Montana's career, this is irrelevent.

People love to say all the success in NE was solely accomplished because of Brady and Brady alone. That is ludicrous, just ignore amount of leadership, roster building, in game decisions, defenses, offensive lines yada yada it took to go to 9 SB's and win 6 of them that had nothing to do with Brady. I hate the Patriots as much as the next guy but Belichick is a great coach, one of the greatest, Brady is a great QB, one of the greatest. Having both of those pieces is why they had sustained success, yet people have to say it was one or the other. I am aware Belichick has a sub 500 record without Brady, just like many of the other great NFL coaches do without their franchise QB.

No one is disputing the volume of postseason success Brady has had vs Montana, what you listed are facts although I did not fact check them, they look correct. The thing you have to consider is if Brady played in the 80's/90's he would have very likely had more injuries and missed more time and it is nearly impossible for him to play into his 40's. If Montana did not have serious back injuries caused by rules that were then changed to prevent and protect a guy like Montana he would have had more volume too. Had Montana played in the 2010's he would have had a longer career with less injuries, he easily could have approached what Brady has done in terms of post season. For instance, Steve Young took over eventually but had Montana had the rules that Brady played under, they likely stick with Montana, do we really think Montana could not have won the SB that Young did? So you have to adjust for those things (volume). Montana won all 4 of his Super Bowl's he played in. Montana had to lead his team to a game winning drive in two of them late in the fourth quarter. Brady often had to get in field goal range. To me, it is a reasonable debate.

I like the first paragraph in terms of every team has holes somewhere, there is not perfect roster. Some teams have better WR's or OL vs others but a hole somewhere else. But when you look at the big picture the top teams are very close in terms of overall talent. People love to cherry pick, "we dont have the WR's the Bengals have" while not really looking at the overall roster. When you have the QB and a solid roster (like the Bills do) you are in the mix. While I do agree injuries are important and can derail things, I don't think that is the biggest reason for winning and losing in the post season. Unless you lose your franchise QB. Other than that injuries happen and they do happen to all teams, and they do often occur at the same position. To me the difference in postseason success is gameplan/in game decisions and strategy. J Johnson was awful, they got him out of there. All teams have to deal with less than ideal players having to fill in.

You know what gets people killed more than brakes 1 week out of service? Running around a highway drunk off you ass.

I understand this but I also think it kind of sucks. So the brakes were not serviced for a week and that likely had 0 to do with any of the events yet somone has to pay out they a** to defend this crap.