Matt_In_NH

That is not how it works

The Lions, LOL

I would be shocked if this is the case. I prefer 1PM also but I expect the max or maybe one less.

Would he want to play in Buffalo after they waived him? I don't agree....there is no real controversy if the reporting yesterday is accurate. If anything the public will be very sympathetic towards him.

I don't agree. The Bills will make some minor adjustments just like they do with west coast trips (same time difference). When teams have had two games on the west coast sometimes they try to stay out there and the results are not good. But they will stay on East Coast time mostly. IF the Jags choose to stay in England they will have their sleep schedules disrupted for a longer period of time.

That is not an advantage. East coast teams who have two west coast games back to back dont have a good record in the second one. They may have an advantage in that they plan in England every year so some nuances of international travel they have more experience with.

We all have them. At least it worked out

So you are a wrong Josh guy!

Breakups suck emotionally and people deal with that differently....not to mention is must be a lot of fun to be a single Josh Allen.

and your opinion is final?

I would put the browns with Chargers....AFC looks challenging.

Possibly Araiza could have ill feelings toward the Bills. But I just don't see the Bills doing that....if anything in hindsight the Bills could have tried to put him on a list (commisioners list type thing) until this got sorted out.

Given this, I don't see how he does not get an NFL contract this summer.

I look at it this way. Would you trade the bills receivers for the commanders broncos or bears receivers? There are more too. I get number two and three might be weaker than we want but I will take the bills group just for Diggs. A few number twos does not outweigh one of the best in the league.

Earl Campbell

You have to draw the line somewhere you can't just give up the farm in every negotiation, I trust him to define where the line is.

It seems clear who the top 6 are....within those, C, RG, RT can be swapped around some. I include Morse because there is some (probably minute) chance the Bills could move on from him to gain the 6 million ish in cap space. The Bills are in the best position to gauge the risk of Morse's concussions. In that scenario Bates plays C, Torrence RG and Brown RT. While we are all excited about the prospects of Torrence, you always have to have a wait and see approach when it comes to rookies.....Codie Ford had a lot of excitement to lock down the RT position that never happened.

Chargers game he sprained his knee wrestling Joey bosa for half an inch at the LOS. He also got turf toe vs the bucs running down the field. He got concussed vs ne running the ball and could not complete the game. There is data that says a qb is more likely to get injured in the pocket but that does not mean they and he should not be smart about when to run and when to slide/go out of bounds/ throw an incomplete pass or take a sack.

OK, but do you agree in electing Trump we just got more lying?

I heard he used an AI chat BOT to make this decision since it can beat him at 5D chess

Me too!

I have a chalk line thing and a five in one and on my way

Mike Mayock on the other hand is 100% in first round picks not getting to their 3rd year.

we are talking decision to pick up 5th year option, not draft decision. And sometimes GM's will err towards picking it up to justify they selection. Same reason higher draft picks sometimes hang around longer than they should.

Agreed, I am just saying picking up 5th year options should not be the measuring stick. It is one piece of information.