Matt_In_NH

Not sure I understand. They are not giving bottom feeders less rest and good teams more reset.....rather simply not constraining themselves allows more flexibility for scheduling marquee matchups. I am ok with this...the only drawback is the whining we will have to deal with when the Bills end up on the bad end one season.

I bet the NFL is intentionally trading some fairness for maximizing quality matchups.

Trust me, I can. I'm a fan with an opinion just like you. We don't have to agree. Gore will be in the HOF.

Most other HOF RB's had a longer period of sustained success.

I think Terrell Davis benefited from an amazing OL/system and had a HOF QB. His output was great for a couple years but I dont think that happens with pretty much any other team.

3 quarters of people pay nothing and just steal content.

The NFL are a bunch of peacocks

Right, probability wise, 0-3 and 3-0 while both possible are also less likely than the other two possibilities (1-2,2-1)

I think they were talking about Bengals, Chiefs Eagles....but same point really. Yes those are great teams.........you know who else is a great team? The Buffalo Bills. Those teams are circling that game as a tough matchup as well.

He was lost in a dark retreat for 4 years. People don’t know those things are dark and it’s hard to get out since you can’t see.

We needed a 13th string back for Milano. Just in case

Wrong nice try. Did you honk your nose when you wrote that?

3-0 is a real possibility

And? Which has been known for months.

I really think this comes down to measure/countermeasure. I think a lot of this falls on Josh (and some Dorsey), most plays have options even if the primary target is supposed to be Davis 18 yards down field. I think Josh recognizing what the defense is trying to do and then knowing instinctively what to do to counter it is what is missing. Josh does well when you blitz him because he can escape the rush and someone will be open. I think more shorter/rhythm passes are needed at times. This league is full of data analytics, every team is looking for what works against this QB or that QB, you have to schematically flexible. Sometimes the dump offs are the right decision.

More like Emmanuel Nacho informed media guy

Living in New Hampshire (Pats country) I will get at least 14 of the 17 with the TBD came up in the air. No sense buying the ticket...I was on the fence but its just not worth it.

They did a good job vs the Bills twice. Bills scored 37 points total. In two games Allen had 350 yards passing, 1 TD and 2 INT's. He also had three rushing TD's but the going was very tough. The Bills will have to counter whatever the Jets were doing.

peacock butts

NE more PT than fish.......... they will be whining

I'll just stick it up its butt and see what happens

Both NE games at 1PM....living in NE I like this....I will get probably 12-13 games on TV....no way I can justify buying the ticket.

Bills at chargers is Peacock, what does that mean, I need another service?

Which means the Bills requested that. Also bye week in week 13 is a lot better than week 6. Going to London is 6 hours, goint to LA is 6 hours, from a timezone stand point, same thing.

that IS NOT How it works. And now you are changing your position. First it is If the Bills play the Jets in NJ in PT then the Jets at Bills MUST be PT, sorry not how it works. Now you are saying better teams get more PT, again NOT how it works. How it works: The NFL decides what games are on PT based on maximizing revenue. Better teams plays into that but it is just one factor. A better team playing a lesser team on the road is better for the NFL because the lesser team has a better chance for the upset or making it a close game, they want to keep eyes on the TV.