Because shoe horning the outcome yesterday as analysis that they would have won last year is an ridiculous. Using injuries as an excuse is sad, teams have injuries all the time. I am not disputing the Bills were at a large disadvantage at LB and CB, they were but they could have won that game and also, they could have lost yesterday. When these teams play it is close. You call winning a game against a team you lost to last year in a certain manner "irrefutable" evidence they would have won last year as some kind of analysis? Some players are different, some coaches are different, the injury situations are different. The premise of this thread is outrageous, nothing that happened yesterday shows what might have been different last year. Every game in the NFL is a unique entity.
To the bolded, can you show where I said there was no irrefutable evidence we would not have won? My point is it has no relevance.