Woodman19

While I hope we take the high road and win the game, it would be interesting to see fireworks lol.

Everything depends on what happens up to that point. You can envision a scenario for anything for something like the draft.

2018 Bills 1st round pick 2018 KC 1st round pick 2018 Bills 3rd round pick 2019 Bills 2nd round pick Is my guess assuming both firsts are in the 12-16 range.

Why would he sign here? We don't have a QB as of now.

It always comes down to value, if he falls in your lap you have to pull the trigger.

Why would we even want him when we already have a QB with a high passer rating?

Imagine you are playing Madden, you have a WR wide open running a post up the middle and you have time to unload a perfect throw. You hit "X" on your controller to unload an easy TD. But the game strangely does something different, he throws it to McCoy who has run to the sideline to give you a 2 yard gain instead. That's what it's like when you have a QB who defers to his safety option on every single player scheme no matter the call, situation and plan. I bet the bunch of you would lose your ****.

What do people really expect, going for 30 yard bombs on every play when you have a QB who can barely throw 10? Besides, you could scheme it and Tyrod still wouldn't try to go deep unless it's out of bounds or too far to risk an Interception.

You get revenge by winning the game. Nothing would satisfy me more than winning that Game and taking the high road and thus make the Pats and Gronkowski bad.

Best case he's Roethlisberger.

He's exactly the type of toolsy QB prospect to invest in if you can't move up and have to "settle" for outside the top 10. He's certainly not a finished product and most fans shy away from those types but don't fool yourself into thinking he's not gone before ~20 in a QB starved league.

If we had pick #1, how many of would trade it regardless of the return? There are enough QB needy teams in the top 10 that you may not be able to trade up to grab one.

Maybe he wants to lose to get a real QB so figures a QB who can't throw 100 yards at home is his best chance at doing it.

Of course, one QB doesn't try to make plays to avoid turnovers while the other makes turnovers trying to make plays. It's much easier to iron out aggressiveness with experience and round out the edges.

One game doesn't make a career.

Most people don't. People interchange the words tank and rebuilding when one means intentionally trying to lose and the other is making legitimately shrewd moves for the future. The Sabres are a perfect example of tanking.

Imagine if by impossible chance both KC and us went 6-10

If everything was the same but we brought in McCown over Tyrod, what do you think our record would be at this point?

I dont see how we dont replace him with McCoy in the offseason, short of McCoy getting a head coaching job (which he wont).

Thats impossible, what they are the first time they start a game is what they will always be.

How good would Rosen look running the West Coast Offense with us right now.

How do you win without a running game and good defense when you have a QB who can't consistently throw?

It isnt even about the QB, if you have a pair of top 15 picks and you hit on both. Thats something that Dynasties are built on.

Put him on the IR to end it. With KC falling apart, we could end up with a pair of top 15 picks!