cba fan

nice one lol. Why are you taking a shot at Hillary? obviously you are referring to Hillary since she "ran" and did not win...……...lol lol...……………...get off my lawn son...……..lol

don't kill the message.

these headphones don't seem to sound right.

lol...…...he then tried to explain its origin and pronounce it, and is now mute with dyslexia to boot.

I have called for him for 2 years now as a Bills b/u only. He looked good in b/u role on Bears and put the ball in WR hands time after time to only suffer drops. I live in Bears country so see every play on big screen with sound as I watch Bills on large HD TV (with better picture by the way and Bills audio on my smart phone) on side of big screen. One game in particular I felt terrible for him, It was Titans at Bears. Matt had a very good game and drove Bears down to potential winning TD score and big upset on last drive and 3 ***** times he put the ball on open WR's hands in end zone and 3 times the ***** dropped it. Sad as hell. The guy balled out and should have gotten the win. He does throw INT's but at least also scores. oh man worse then I remember. Many drops great comeback by Barkley. https://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2016112703/2016/REG12/titans@bears

the team is very very young, not in avg., but in player per player. you have to look at the details not the avg which is skewed. All the prime time players up and coming are 2 yrs and less exp., Dawkins, White, Edmunds, Milano, H Phillips, Corey Bojorquez, J Allen, Z Jones, 40% of the roster has 2 years or less experience. 45% has 3 yrs or less. TEN are rookies. soon the oldest players will be off team as soon as next year guys with 10-14 years in league like Humber, McCoy, Alexander, K Williams, D Anderson, C Ivory, and even J Hughes. That will make Bills even more young.

and also were not actively shopping Watkins or Darby or Dareus. Beane seems to have a knack for making trades when not trying to make trades I guess.

Edelman tried to pull up some art turf to throw up and check wind.....lol

that first sentence must be a typo? "wouldn't have beaten" ? that is saying they think Pats would have still beaten the Bears without the special teams play/scores, and that, is a real heck of a reach.

It is similar but not the same as a "red herring" in argumentative situations. basically they are both diversions or redirections. wkie: A red herring is an unrelated or irrelevant topic in an argument that distracts someone from the actual argument. A straw man, on the other hand, is when someone distorts an argument into a new, twisted version that's easier to argue against.Apr 14, 2016

Not true. Terry offered him a generous raise thinking that would placate Marrones desire for FO changes and more power Marrone wanted. Terry was shocked Marrone opted out after promising to talk to him first and then next day opting out.

that's SIX And I will add T Johnson DB as seven. And the new punter has clear potential. Just needs more hang time.

well then...…...it better turn into a 3rd before they trade him or otherwise no trade.

LA Chargers say...… hold my beer.

only way Bills have a chance would be if the D could magically pitch a shutout. even then it is still 50-50 if Bills can win.

lol....a compound breaking point.

?? what is your point? There are literally about only 3 or 4 starting white receivers in NFL on any given year(and about 50% of them are on Patriots) so him saying Bills should draft WR implies you draft an African-American about 99+ % of the time.

and a catheter

DiMarco is kind of a Peterman type TE. trouble seems to find him.

Liberals and Dems answer to every need is: raise taxes.

you will gross the complete 970 over 20 or 30 years. you never net all of any income due to taxes. So not sure where you are going with this. it is not the states job to give you tax free lottery winnings. In Europe they do have lotteries that are guaranteed after taxes. So if you win a million you actually get more to pay any taxes due. only tax free income I can think of in US is life insurance.

that's why he said. "However, that is highly unlikely so we don't need to worry."

you can get all 970 if you take it over 20 years or whatever that state offers. all will still be subject to taxes just like any income you receive.