Patrick Duffy

If those that say that don't think we can beat Pats then they shouldn't expect much in the playoffs

Obviously Colts,

Not sure if serious, but I have not seen anything like that from anyone.....but if serious and some feel that way then that's very odd, although considering some of the nonsense from a few that's posted it would not surprise me. Common sense that every team would want to establish a run game,

Gabe Davis on offense Hyde on defense

What makes you think that?

Yeah I watched the play a few times and thought it looked like your normal play where a player trying to make a catch falling like usual. Like many times every game I saw his head hit the ground. So guess he hit it just the right way to ring his bell.

I miss the Paul Tagliabue days......

Agreed, I posted in another thread about this exact issue. His decisions are more questionable than you'd like along with struggling to adjust too often.

I wouldn't go quite that far. I don't think he's below average, I have kinda felt he was just a little above average, or at very least average.

Just a "what if" question for the hell of it...as for that fade or back shoulder play to Diggs with 20 seconds left in the game on 3rd and 2 (I think it was) that pretty much everyone agrees should have been called PI or least holding.... "What if" flipping teams and it was Bucs WR instead of Diggs with Bills on D, does the flag come out for Bucs or same no call?

Yeah definitely there are times (some but not a lot) a play may get changed at the line or an adjustment the fails. There have been times where too many "wtf" plays were called that didn't get changed too. And do you disagree that Daboll has not been making adjustments like he should far too often? I mean it's clear to me it's an area that comes into question. Also after the franchise, star QB is limping in pain he continued to call designed QB runs. I feel he is a little more at fault than everything else.

This would not surprise me the tiniest bit

Is he a male version of the entitled women that's called "Karen"? lol

Exactly....and so much talk about "Bills have no running game", "RBs suck", "OL sucks" etc, I may be the minority here...but I think it's more to it than that. I feel like the RBs don't get nearly enough opportunities and that also plays a part. There's been some good runs here and there this season the very few times a running play has been called. Just saying while obviously improvement is needed, a RB(s) getting 5-10 carries per game likely isn't going to have a chance to get good numbers as a RB getting 20 attempts or so per game. I do think the running game isn't as bad as it seems to be.

While there's plenty of blame to go around for offensive struggles lately from injuries affecting the OL, poor execution etc...having taken all of those things into consideration I still feel Daboll has been more of the reason than those others imo. His lack of adjustments and questionable decisions has been more of the problem than anything else imo

Again, as I said up-thread, sometimes it seems the league makes things up as they go....

They were pulling on Diggs so much I'm sure his jersey is stretched 2 extra sizes. I can get past the bad calls/non calls, although still really piss me off, but it's much more the timing of it that's the issue. The Diggs fade you mentioned, crucial point of the game that would be called large majority of the time...also just a "what if" scenario for ***** and giggles, in your opinion if we flip it and it was Brady/Bucs and same exact thing happens to Bucs WR and Bills on D....do you think it gets called for them? Then in OT the call on Wallace during another crucial moment....

It's weird though that Denver was forced to play because they "lied about things/didn't follow guidelines", but thinking back at Tenn when Bills were about to play them...didn't they also lie and/or not follow guidelines also and they got basically kind of rewarded lol?? Idk, similar type situation and different results in handling by the league

Yeah I think Bills beat Pats this 2nd time since it's less likely weather may not be nearly as much of a factor as before. As for the other 3 opponents, there is no reason (other than some major issue popping up) Bills can't handle each one of those struggling teams and handle convincingly for the most part.

Yeah it's tightened it's grip it seems. Can only hope each Bills player/coach etc are following guidelines 100% as best as possible and maybe keep it to a minimum

I'm with you here all day. Agreed, sadly and unfortunately that's not the only thing I don't trust with the NFL.

lol, I was ok with the Ken on the "Street Fighter" arcade game back in the day...

Not sure what scenario in regards to being best interest for Bills you were thinking here, but imo I would change 3 of those games here... I'd rather want Raiders over Browns Colts over Pats (no brainer to me) Steelers over Tenn

ok thanks....not sure how in the world I don't recall that. Guess my mind is getting worse and worse the older I get...

I don't even remember Brown playing LT in preseason lol, then again I wasn't able to catch each preseason game. But if the others looked worse then I guess you would go with the one that isn't the worse??? lol