Patrick Duffy

Well alrighty then. OJ's got a twitter. Wonder if he will ever go back and forth with Trump. That should be an interesting conversation.

Agree with everything here basically. Just also wanted to point out about the bolded that I think that was more the case with Richie than not. I think they know and knew a lot more going on with Richie behind then scenes that some people may think. I think they were very close with the Richie issues and that it helped them make the decision that they ultimately decided to make with him. And I for one agree with them. I liked him and think he was a heck of a player, but to me, he was clearly one of those players that you kinda had to keep a close eye on and be aware of what goes on with him.

I stopped reading after the first 3 sentences and I'm surprised I let myself get that far. You are clearly missing the entire point that I was saying and I'm not wasting my time with you. So again, carry on with yourself. Have fun.

Again, saying ***** that didn't happen. What is it with posters like you? Amazing!. The person you say I "attacked" DID NOT MAKE A PREDICTION. He sated it as a FACT that referred them in the bottom THIS season that HAS NOT STARTED YET. If it would have been just a prediction then I wouldn't have pointed it out in the 1st place. Of course we all make predictions, but you can't call a prediction a "fact" when it has not even happened yet. And YES you were comparing those WR,s you listed, or implying that I was comparing the two, which again is nonsense jibberish that never happened. Do you even read what you type? Serous question. Hard to believe that you do with some of the stuff I see you post. Looks like that seems to be very hard for you to understand for some reason. Maybe the caps can help you read it better, and it's sad that you go making stuff up to try and justify your silly, nonsense of a pitiful argument.

First off, I never said that "you" said it, you quoted me about the subject so I explained. Secondly, the poster that I was originally referring to once again ,stated it as a fact. To answer your IMO awkward question, a draft is held for teams to get better and younger players, depending on needs and how much cap room they have (amazed I am explaining this). The other part about passed performances is players change, they get better and they get worse (thought that was quite obvious also) Don't know how you manage to get picking names out of a hat with my previous post, I'm baffled by that one. Anyways, I don't know where your trying to go with this because my previous post was about the poster who stated the WR core was already bottom of the league when the season hasn't started. I made that perfectly clear, all this other stuff you're talking about, I have no idea how you got that out of my post. Anyways, feel like I'm just repeating myself and talking to air. So I'm going to move and and just let you spin your tires here. Have a good 1.

OMG wow, okay one last time here. I am saying, you can not say that the WR core is the bottom of the league right now and the season hasn't started yet. Pretty simple. And AGAIN, yes predicting is fine, no problem. But when a prediction is stated as a fact based upon a football season that hasn't begun yet is silly. This isn't hard to understand. The point is simple, we DO NOT know if they will be the bottom of the league until the season gets almost over with.

Not too far, I try to keep her away from the public eye as much as possible

Their career stats mean absolutely nothing to the point I was making. Nothing at all. My point again (if you failed to read the original post I quoted) was that the poster stated the Bills WR core are the bottom of the league, stating as if it is a fact as of right now. Last year maybe they were toward the bottom, but nobody can say they are the bottom now when the season hasn't started. The bolded that you posted here, you clearly state they will be improved and in which case I agree they absolutely "should". So there you go, if they are improved, then how can they be bottom, and again the season hasn't started yet? That's my point. We can all try to predict the future, but stating it as if it has already happened is silly.

How bout lets not and stick to the facts of which the post I originally quoted was, you can't say a WR core, especially with some new additions are THE BOTTOM of the league in a season which hasn't started yet. All that jibberish you posted (in regards to quoting me) is just that, jibberish. In no way, shape, or form was I comparing them to those players you listed, so you just posted a bunch of nonsense in that fact. I'm simply stating they can't be the worst in the league in a season that has not started. In all likely hood they will be better than last year, by how much, we don't know.

Doesn't matter if "you" say they are not impressive. Nobody can say they are the bottom of the league when it hasn't started yet, that's just silliness. You, me , him, or anyone else has no idea how the WR core will do. They could be a little better than last year, or a lot better than last year. Highly doubt they will be worse than last year, but as I said, we just don't know. So again, one stating they are in the bottom when TC hasn't even started is silly talk.

Now you can see the future and know they will be bottom of the league in a season that has not began yet? Nonsense, You nor I don't know if they will be bottom of the league this season. The new WR core is a bottom of the league unit when the season hasn't started. Wow, just wow.

Yeah I think we may see more from him than deep catches in his 2nd year. I mean just watching him running some of those routes in OTAs with finesse the way he does and the way he gets his foot in the ground and cutting ability, he definitely is looking the part so far. Long as the chemistry between he and Allen are up to par, I believe we may see some amazing things from him. IMO I definitely think he will continue where he left off at the back end of last season and add more to his game.

To be fair,that could happen to any player despite their size. All it takes is one big guy to fall on a leg or ankle the wrong way. So size IMO has nothing to do with someone getting hurt in a bundle of NFL player bodies.

He's definitely got good hands. With him and the other additions I definitely look for the dropped passes to decrease tremendously.

Agree,I think they will be pretty good this year as well. Edmunds 2nd year and hopefully he will be better along will Milano coming back healthy. Think they will be good this year and next few years as long as they can remain healthy.

Would be great. I do however think that they "should" at least get more QB pressure and QB sacks than last year,which could lead to more turn overs. Am excited to see them in action as well as the offense this year.

Your stupidity speaks volumes.

Well if certain people have said that then that's silly. No matter what means tome that any circumstances can happen whether it be 0-16 or 3-13 and still stay for5 years. All the ones that I saw were inferring that they could stay for 5 years with some sort of success. For example 10-6 the next 2 seasons and barely missing the playoffs, in which case I can absolutely see them staying for 5 years. A bad record for the next 2 season(in which no matter what means), then most likely not.

4 to 5 years to build a playoff team, or 5 years no matter what? lol

Again,I have, quite thoroughly and have not seen that. Which is why I think your full of ***** or you may have misread. As I stated, I have seen 4 to 5 years with some amount of success, not 5 years no matter what. That's basically saying they get 5 years even if they go 1-15 for 5 years. Which is absurd.

Where? I haven't seen that. I have seen 5 years with "some amount" of progress. But I haven't seen 5 years "no matter what". Unless I missed it somehow, but I doubt anyone would say they get 5 years no matter the outcome, but then again some will say some silly stuff at times. Anyways just asking where you saw 5 years no matter what.

Good, looks like he and JA may be getting a little chemistry together already. That can only be a good sign.

yes, a couple years ago. She actually got in touch with a family member and got my number. She and her bf at the time had just split, so think she was just looking for a quick rebound or just wanted to get plowed by someone she was familiar with. I'm not sure, in any event I did the right thing and told her I was married still and could not partake in the laughing and talking of memories past that eventually will lead to some pipe laying.

I thought it was called "ball washing" In a much earlier post in the thread anyway lol