Patrick Duffy

Nah bro, I seriously want to know if you understand now? You made a huge thing out of it so I want to make sure you're all good now....

I meant "regardless "of the possibility if it could be reworked (which we done know if it could, even if by chance it could, which we also don't know by how much). So I kinda went out on a limb and assumed it wouldn't be vet min or less enough if it were to be reworked to be worth the risk, imo Got it this time?

Maybe , but "regardless" of what numbers you think make since it likely would not be vet min. Which imo wouldn't be worth the risk. You following me here now? We on same page yet? We good?

Yeah, as responding to original post I quoted which read, "we could rework his contract". So I take it you assumed that means vet min to you?

Lol, so you think he Mcaffrey is could be had for vet min? Even with the injury issue he wouldn't be that low

If Bills make it to SB and playing Brady....some of those same feelings we have felt for 20 yrs when he has the ball in his hand against Bills will come back. At least a little bit maybe...

Makes plenty of sense for me, here you go since it's upsetting for you... https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/regardless I was using as an adverb as you can see scrolling down just a bit....meaning despite what has been said or done.

Yeah I get what you're saying. It's possible he could make it for post season. But that's not my point though. Point was originally disagreeing with you about trading for either of those players. You said you would and I'm simply saying imo it's not worth the risk.

Agreed.

Cool, Cards fans can think what they want. I'm talking about what's been reported everywhere he's done for season. I didn't hear he could make it back for playoffs per those reports. Unless it's recently changed.

Wow! This seems way more important to you than it is for me....so whatever the case, moving on

Only thing I could figure. I quoted a poster saying Bills could rework his contract, so I said regardless of that still wouldn't do it.. So what'sthe issue? What am I missing here?

Watt was reported done for season and Mcaffrey I don't have confidence he'd get through to round 2 even if he was

Yeah Yeah, meant irregardless, your handcuffs are too tight spelling officer. How bout loosening em up for me? 😑

Well I guess... but regardless of contract it still not worth it imo. Reliability and/or availability is important and he doesn't have any of that at this point in his career.

Not worth the risk.

To tell the truth.....I always had that bad/worried/unconfident kinda of feeling that goes down to pit of my stomach each and every time we played against Brady all those years. So I'm sure if it plays out that way the PSD likely kicks in lol. But won't be as bad knowing it's not the same ol Bills now.

Nah, I wouldn't have the slightest droplet of confidence in his availability. You said the obvious in bold here. Regardless of the contract it's not worth the risk imo,

If had to pick 1, would you choose Sanchez or Tua?

Indy? Is this not about Khalil Mack? Last I saw he's still on Bears. K n/m. Just read 1st page of thread. I just assumed it was K.Mack. My bad.. lol

Well guess he's not playing better enough. Not better enough to lead his team to a win over those 2 bad teams. However, there was recent notification that informed me that there is reason to be concerned of the serious possibility for him "blowing up" the Bills Defense Sunday. So I for one, will be prepared and in no way will be caught off guard by this sudden change in his play and having a career all around game. Nah, no worries at all about Watson or anyone else

I'd love it if somehow that happened. In reality chances are it won't. Always wanted to see him in a Bills uni. Maybe someday before he runs out of juice

No

Sponsored by Budweiser, Pepsi, and Doritos......

Lol, ok that's my point. Because the public statements were lies then that means the public statements is what did it. So if they wouldn't have lied in the 1st place nothing would have come of it. So the start of it was the public statement. Whether truth or lies, it was a statement made. So if you say it's not the public statements being the reason for the fall out, then what would you say is the reason?