Jump to content

Scott7975

Community Member
  • Posts

    24,877
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Scott7975

  1. I'm up too early today. I'm so glad this is a 1pm game or I'd lose my mind waiting for the game. I look out my window and it looks dreary out. Fall is here. I love the fall but I hate the winter. I am reminded that it is coming soon. LFG BUFFALO!! I get that our O has sucked the last two weeks, but I'd be stunned if we lost today. The Pats are one of the worst teams in the league right now. I don't care what they looked like against Philly. Philly has not played all that great this year despite their record.
  2. I have no vendetta against player grades. I don’t care about them at all because they are completely subjective. Considering I posted a link to the actual data being used and that was actually my argument that it was other data being used and not player grades, your statement is wrong. then I misunderstood what you said but I have seen you say it in the past.
  3. I get so tired of hearing this. The NFL is not paying PFF for their player grades. There is a ton of stuff that PFF provides the NFL teams that isn't even available to the public. I have posted a few times now everything the NFL gets for that money. Player grades are a microscopic data point compared to what they receive for that money. Just because player grades are part of the package, doesn't mean the NFL takes any stock into those grades. For example, PFF provides NFL teams with things like how often a team runs each formation, what type of plays are run out of that formation and how often. What teams run on each down, etc. Things like that are what is valuable to an NFL team each week when a team only has a week or less to prepare for an opponent. I doubt any team cares that PFF rates X player 84.5 or 24.3. Thats small potatoes. This is what teams pay for: https://media.pff.com/2018/08/PFF-Play-Data-Fields.pdf
  4. Sorry. Those feet just don't do it for me.
  5. Kelce is 34 years old and has been playing gimpy most of the season. Kelce had 110 targets last season.
  6. 3 catches for 33 yards and was 6th in yards on our team that day. I would say probably not. The dude is washed.
  7. He isn't getting any ownership stake in any team before he even plays a down in the NFL.
  8. In two games last year he had a total of 2 catches for 11 yards. The year before 3 for 48 and 3 for 41. Not much to worry about. He has had way better games than games against the Bills. Last year the Bills were his worst games other than like 1 other team.
  9. We brought him back last year and he did jack. The dude is washed. People need to accept that and move on. The Giants have no one at receiver and even Daboll couldn't use him.
  10. I mean there was that one game he scored 3 or 4 tds in a row because we kept getting penalized. We could all here him say "How man fn TDs do I need to score" lol.
  11. He still had Kelce, Pachecko who ran all over the place with the ball, and some mid recievers who were all at the Davis level or better that were schemed wide open and caught the football. As well as an elite oline Just stop.
  12. Josh is a top 3 QB in this league. He doesn't process the field as fast as Mahomes nor always throw as accurate as Mahomes but he is still an elite top 3 QB. This thread is insane.
  13. I don't but it isn't worth wasting time going to look over a comment. I argued with quite a few people after I said he was washed. Yeah Daboll has always yelled and screamed at his players in front of people. Thats why he was moved up in the booth here because he was yelling at Allen too much. Time management in that game was his fault anyways. He let the clock run and took a timeout on 3rd down. Then he ran the ball to get the first down and took another timeout. He was the one that screwed the clock, not Tyrod.
  14. Nah. Its obviously exaggerated. Not everyone, but there were a lot of people that still wanted him.
  15. Now just look on these forums for High Football IQ. Its the same dude. He did the same thing on the official buffalo bills boards before they shut them down. As for the thread... I said two years ago Beasley lost a step. I said last year he was washed. Everybody here was all mad he was let go though.
  16. well if we had a really good slot then said slot would be our #2, not Davis.
  17. He didn't advertise it. I think it was one of those "I got some anonymous source inside the club and this is what they told me" kind of thing. If Mac keeps playing bad, he will be pulled sooner or later. He has already been benched for a partial game. It's also possible they try to use that other QB as like an occasional wild cat QB. There have been a few teams in that past that have done that sort of thing.
  18. Im tired and been up since yesterday morning so I am not going to respond to this yet but I did want to take the time to apologize that I got you mixed up with another poster on that Samuel bit. Sorry about that.
  19. It's a bigger leap on your part to try and say that Davis is route limited by design. If that's the case then Dorsey is a problem. And to tell the truth you tried to compare Davis to Samuel lol.
  20. What he is trying to say is Davis is route limited because Dorsey wants him to be route limited by design. Huge stretch IMO.
  21. He runs sprints with the two routes that he runs. Thats what he does. Occasionally has a 10 yard curl. Yeah but he only catches like 3 balls a game. Thats not a consistent chain mover. Its 3 chunk plays a game. Thats what that is. The rest of the game he is a decoy running sprints and invisible. For a team that wants to methodically move the ball down the field, you need more than just Diggs to do that. Davis is not good at much of anything besides running down the sideline. He aint a route tree guy. He aint a separation guy. He aint a contested catch guy. He aint a speed guy. He's a guy that runs down the sideline. The Bills need better than that. That should be clear from the fact they signed back a washed up Brown and Beasley off their couch last season. If Diggs went down this offense would be toast because Davis isn't good enough to hold down the fort. I'm happy they drafted Kincaid but they don't use the TEs much. Why? I don't know. The draft choice made sense given where we were at and what was available. Knox was just given a high contract to be that guy though. Kincaid doesn't change what Davis is. The Chiefs continually look to address the WR every season and every in season. Thats why they just traded with the Jets to get their receiver back from them, because they know they need to improve in that area. Thats why they keep spending high draft picks on them.
  22. Yeah, I am so sure that the Dorsey developed an offense that one WR has two routes that he runs almost all the time. Come on man.
×
×
  • Create New...