Riverboat Richie

What does Holy cow another one mean? You didn't expect a response. You jumped on responses by others without any research. Why did you fell the need to respond and the bail on the logic behind it?

Just keep posting things you heard and believe them for the facts that that aren't. Seems to be a message board creed.

You responded to something I posted didn't you?

How many did he miss? This team gave up some yardage to running backs. Maybe if they get their buts off the field he wouldn't have to make as many as he did. And while you're looking at those stats look at the company he keeps and the teams they play for. There is a reason he's coming back to the Bills for a visit.

Maybe the new agent won't ask for the "No Tackling" clause he had in the last contract. Seems like a lot of guys had that written in.

The reality is that they won't know what players are going to do under the guidance of the new coaching staff on both sides of the ball. It's all new to everyone and there is no last year.

You're going to let these guys get to you? Not important enough for me to worry about.

What's wrong? Did you not find a prize in your Lucky Charms this morning? I don't think they put them in there anymore,

Switch coaching staffs and flip-flop systems every two years or so and try to pick players you won't have to replace because they don't fit the system. I seriously wonder how you get 7/8 wins doing that.

Didn't Houston have a guy they were stuck with because of a huge cap hit? I guess it can happen.

Yea, you're right, it should have followed the Kaepernick value thread.

Wrecks would not have sat Taylor. Doesn't sound like something Wrecks would do. In fact wasn't the topic of conversation how Wrecks was let go early due to the benching or non-benching of Taylor? With or without Wrecks, no telling who would start but I believe the Bills would have had to go with Taylor. Why release him if Dak sat the bench and didn't get a shot at showing what he could do? Doesn't make sense.

No one is disputing that. Would not have had the same outcome in Buffalo. All I'm saying.

If he's not signed by someone after the draft, he will be after a starter goes down, if and when that happens.

Everybody loves a clown. Wrecks is that if nothing else.

A little of topic but you think Dak Prescott would have had the same things happen to him had the Bills taken him? Prescott, like Wilson, would not have been the QBs they are now had the Bills taken either. It doesn't work like that. I still don't believe a QB should be taken before the third round this year. It's my opinion and what I believe.

So Scouts, GMs and Coaches be damned because many FANS don't want to wait a couple more years. Just waste a pick and take a QB, any QB, just for the sake of taking a QB because it's what the fans want. Doesn't matter if the guy can run your system or can't grasp the Pro Game. Doesn't matter if he didn't play more than two years or who he played against, just take one right?. .....Wow....

Oh, I agree. I think CB and WR are the obvious choices but If it turned out the Bills liked Howard, I just would not hate it. Not looking for it, just wouldn't hate it.

Gives them a chance to part ways with Clay if he just can't produce. If he does that give a big two TE option that NE had at one time.

I would not hate that pick.

I get the feeling it's going to look more like the 2011 QB draft. But that's just me.

I think you're right.

Good one!

Depends on what CBs or WRs are there. I like Foster but going to a 4-3, I'm not sure ILB is a need. Oh and for the record, I asked if you were back pedaling.

Not a fan of spreading speculation and individual opinions as facts.