Jump to content

MiltonWaddams

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MiltonWaddams

  1. Stark...singular.....but well played enough to engage me for sufficient time to post this....
  2. Southern Ontario born and raised. My dad went to games when I was a kid, so I followed the team with him. First NFL game I went to was a Bills-Fins game and as a teenager in the early nineties, I wasn't buying the gear from the team in pastel. Been afflicted ever since.
  3. Ice, you're a great dude. However sometimes it feels like you are just rubbing it in our face. Just kidding, but really it does. LOL
  4. Welcome to the world of Internet forums.
  5. Not pardoned. Not at all. But, seriously, why would we want that mopey SOB on the team? So he could sulk his way through the season as he warms the bench and makes everyone around him grumpier? It's not like the guy has been tearing up the league and is just a grump. He's been crapping the bed and a grump. The fact that he has starting experience means zilch when you consider who he is. I understand that he was once considered a franchise QB, but those days are years behind him for a reason.
  6. OP, you are living up to your screen name. Don't smoke and post.
  7. Well...he is a body that has previously played LB on an actual NFL defence. And....that is about the only positive thing I can say.
  8. Hawks are a good fit. Kearse has been their "big WR" the past few years and is a decent #3, but he's playing a #2 role due to injuries/Lockett growing into the role . Graham, Baldwin, Kearse, Lockett and Aiken (with Paul Richardson as their second speedster) would really help Russell out.
  9. Want - Corey Davis Don't - Peppers Dark horse- Foster (only due to character concerns as it is justified based on ability) Think - Howard
  10. "Per police encounter" is very operative here. I wish we could just move this thread to PPP
  11. This. The way I see it, the Bills need a Vet back up QB with the ability to run the same offence as TT. As this is a sport, and your political leanings should in no way impact your feelings towards the player due to their beliefs or political sensibilities, the right player to help the team should be brought in to do just that. This is a back-up QB, not a starter, and people need to get over that. Maybe that is just my sentiment as a Canadian who applauds freedom of speech and the freedom to protest in a non-violent manner. Colin loves America, he just doesn't love the division that has occurred and the blatant violence against minorities. If you can't get that, you are part of the problem.
  12. Give me an above-average qb today like that and I'll do a standing back-flip. In the Pantheon of QBs, he sits in the top 10 all-time. I'll take that every day.
  13. It may be slightly unfounded, but I'd gamble on Josh before Martavis. Josh seems like he wants to change, he just falls back into old habits without support. The Browns are not, recently historically speaking, an organization known for helping their troubled players get out of their bad habits. Steelers are a solid organization. Martavis just seems like more of a gamble based on all I have seen of him in interviews and his on-field antics. Undoubtedly talented, but a massive risk.
  14. It should surprise you. That is definitely a worst case scenario
  15. Yesssss! We have a guy that will compete for WR3! But, at the same time...yessss.....we have a WR! What a saga...glad that's over. Hope he blossoms in Buffalo. Size and athleticism are there.
  16. Cousineau has to be a popular choice. Terrible, terrible. Whatever the story was with the contract and the neglect on draft day, he was the biggest waste of a pick. Patulski, Maybin and Mike Williams, despite his concencus status, were all in the running for sure, but at least they played for the team. Edit: I didn't know this, but I just googled who they traded him for to Cleveland and it ended up being a first rounder: Mr James Edward Kelly. Maybe not the biggest wasted pick after all....
  17. It must have been hell at BBMB. It sure feels like they've transported the flame over here.
  18. I love that, 4 years in, he is still viewed as a developmental project. Not saying it never happens, but I don't see Geno as the poster boy for late bloomers
  19. 8am here. I am only one coffee in and apparently need another. Thanks.
  20. It's not AP. He did play....albeit a minimal amount
  21. I watch every Seahawks game and have enjoyed his play out here and would love to see him on the Bills. That being said, his injury doesn't answer questions, it adds to the list of them.
  22. Yeah...we will. We saw what he could/couldn't do when given the opportunity. He was handed the reins in year 1, which I would not say was the plan. The thing is that he wasn't tasked with running a complex offence. He didn't have a great OL, but he made about 1/4 of the plays you need from a starting QB. He just wasn't good.
×
×
  • Create New...