dgrochester55

Nope, what you posted is what you advocate. You are fine with a man hitting a woman if the ends justify the means. Try to walk it back if you would like, but your true colors leaked out there.

Sadly, now that I think about it, there is a possible chance these days that the assailant was also a woman. Since it was a far left protest, that makes the chances more likely than normal.

Not surprised that a far lefty would resort to this violence. Thank you for reminding the rest of us how the left views free speech. For those on the center and right, lets thank Roundy for his transparency about his views on men hitting women and reminding us why the far left should never have absolute power. Note: The morbidly obese manchild pig who slapped her would fare about as well as Ned Beatty in deliverance if he ever tried to hit a man like that. You could tell that even the old guy speaking thought that what he did was out of line.

Mainstream media step-by-step protest coverage strategy. Liberal protest: 1) Find the two dozen people scattered in a ten block radius. 2) Move them to an alley or other narrow area. 3) Get a "candid" shot of them all crowded together screaming at the top of their lungs. 4) Include that photo and a stock photo with a crowd of thousands in the article 5) Create a headline "Thousands peacefully protest all over nation for XXXXXX" Conservative protest 1) Locate the crowd of hundreds peacefully protesting. 2) Drive around a few blocks until you see the one guy with a confederate flag and take a photo of them alone 3) Find the few lefty counter protesters acting violent, take a photo and also label them as far right extremists 4) Create a headline "Policy is loved by most, but a few extremists terrorize city and threaten residents" 5) Reference 01/06 in the article and make it at least half of the content

It doesn't depend on anything. Either way, you will make 237 posts tomorrow on how much you hate Trump because that is your primary passion and interest in life. It is all that you have and if he was to be gone tomorrow, you would probably freeze in fear at your desk and have a severe panic attack because you would be thrown off by the sudden giant void in your life.

What a horsecrap, drama mongering, gossip girl post. You've just spent 120 hours straight with no sleep whining about the tariffs and now he is a coward for considering the adjustment based on the drop. The difference between you and your merry band of trolls and others expressing valid concerns is that you would have been making just as many complaining posts in that stretch of time if the market had gone up ten percent last week. If the dow went up 3000 pts tomorrow, you would still find something to b@tch about.

It's funny because these are the same people that dismissed inflation and cost issues for three years telling us that it was a conspiracy theory and that the complainers were all losers who needed to learn how to manage their money better and get a real job. People on the right shouldn't fall into the same pattern. A large dip in retirement and savings balances is a fully valid concern and deserves empathy, especially when we are all seeing it. Some of us have faith that it will recover fast, others don't but lets not fall into the same trap as they did under Biden.

I don't like a lot about these changes either, but some of you all have been creating threads and panic posts for ten days straight at all hours. Are you all even sleeping at any point? Not healthy. Even if you are 100% against the tariffs, that is no way to live life.

Every portion of your reply only further proved all of my points. You are a narcissist and an a--hole which is exactly why you also have the TDS mentality. Have a good rest of your day.

Ok, how about pointing out the typical narcissist DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) far left response that you just applied. "Oh little poor me is just trying to speak my dear little mind and you are being mean and taking away my rights!" The real issue is that you shared a tweet using a term that lefties would cancel someone on the right for using. Are you telling me that calling someone the r-word is a valid criticism? Typical "Rules for thee and not for me". Admit it and own it. There is a difference between valid criticism and making a full time job out of saying how much they hate one person for nine years. I was right the first time, self-absorbed a-hole.

No, the only simple explanation that TDS people are all just self-absorbed a-holes who found an extreme niche in politics that allows them to act exactly as they would naturally be in day-to day life. End of discussion.

Dropping the R-word? There is some nice lefty inclusiveness.

One of the biggest reasons why people do not like the tariffs is because they think that countries will call their bluff and it will lead to trade wars. Situation like this is what they were hoping for and any article like this is encouraging because at the end of the day, I am tired of seeing my retirement and savings plummet. There is still a ways to go, but shouldn't we all want it to go well? Serious question, would you rather see this surprise everyone, succeed and result in the US economy becoming more stable, or is " I told you" so to the orange man so important to you that a recession and lost savings is worth it? I do not get that mentality. I've never hated any politician so much that I would rather cheer against my country and personal well being than see them succeed.

Should someone tell Homelander that not every random thought deserves it's own thread?

Ultimately, the success or failure of the tariffs are not going to depend on an uninhabited island which is an Australian territory that was only included due to a clerical error involving mislabeled shipments. It is a petty distracting sidebar meant to fuel outrage and disbelief. If you want to play the "bUt OrAnGe MaN tAx PeNgUiN" card, and get the cheap laugh go ahead, but after that, you have added nothing and not convinced anyone in the center and right that the left has a better option. If we want to discuss how bad this is, it is only fair to present what the democrats would have done to get us out of debt. I want to know what the other option was so that I can compare. P.S before you call me a MAGA, I am against these tariffs too, it is too much too soon and I am not convinced that the long term gains will offset the short term losses. Stupid distractions and irrelevant side bars like that from the TDS side only cause both sides to dig their heels in more and not get any closer to a meaningful discussion. Edit: This article explains it without as much slant and spin as the other mainstream options. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly8xlj0485o

Anyone with a computer or mobile device, and a slight bit of common sense can quickly run a search and learn simple facts. Things such as Heard and McDonald island were only included because all Australian territories were part of the tariff and Russia already has sanction and a tariff would have been redundant. Progressives are conditioned to use propaganda and high frutcose corn syrup quality tweets because 95% of the time they have no ammo or actual solution to the problem. Now they have a scenario within the 5% where they may actually gain ground. For example, they could point out the market performance over the last three days and have something compelling. Instead, they still stick to lies and incomplete information in the form of partial truth propaganda tweets because like most sociopaths, lying is so ingrained in them that it is impossible for them to stop.

I'm 2 for 3, having also blocked C-section and the quack. Haven't done 4th and long yet because sometimes reading their posts is entertaining in a way that is similar to watching a bad American Idol or AGT audition.

It's funny because they would have you believe that as soon as Trump was done with the tariff announcements at 4:30, that the executives made a snap decision at 4:35 to lay thousands off and announce it within an hour. The reality is that it takes at least months to plan this and the the layoffs plans were already in place, most likely before Trump even started. Was it due to Biden's policies, anticipation of Trump's incoing policies, or a combination of both? I couldn't know without looking into it more, but this is the equivalent of them trying to say that Trump didn't add a tariff to Russia because he loves Putin instead of the real reason of them already having sanctions. TDS people have a real issue to latch on to now to use as a chance to try convince others to come back to them and can't stay out of their own way by coming up with these skewed and fear mongering propaganda pieces.

I was liberated from pointless troll spam two weeks ago when I blocked Csection3.

If this rule applied, I would have had to call you stupid about 20 times today. In order to be more accurate, what your sentence should have said to better reflect your stance, "if you say anything that I do not agree with, I will continue to insult you like a child because I am not capable of participating in society like a civilized person"

But you don't understand, Roundy looks at the data(i.e. Googled "dow crashing because of Trump" and found the tweetable tidbit that best matched his agenda.) We would have never known that the market went down if not for him. And since we are not macroeconomics experts like him,(honorary degree in dunning-kruger studies at Google U) we are all idiots. Otherwise, we would have known that this was the last day of the market ever and that there is a 100% guarantee of failure because he doesn't like it. Now, I've expressed my own concern and stated that I do not like what happened yesterday, because it is too much too fast, but that isn't good enough for the TBD TDS TMI troll gang because you are either all in on orange man bad 100% of the time or you are a MAGA. Perfect example of TDS mentality. I did express critcism of yesterday, but since it didn't not include panic, hate and fearmongering, it wasn't good enough. That is why you are a TDS person. Edit: Looks like the fraudulent, opioid prescribing quack is still taking pot shots at me even though I blocked it three months ago.

Roundy=One childish insulting troll that hasn't formed an opinion outside of what CNN says since the Bills were in a superbowl But Roundy saw it on CNN, so we all MUST panic.

Nope, I stated that the dems have yet to come up with something, not that "only Trump could" stop twisting my words to fit your agenda. I also explicitly said that I did not like what happened yesterday, but you conveniently must have skimmed over that part. You call me stupid, but your reading comprehension indicates a pot and kettle scenario. If you can't have a conversation without an insult then shut the hell up, sit down and let the adults talk.

MO of the online posting left. If you look at any given online discussion, on the surface it looks like 90% agree with them, but in reality, it is the same three to ten people with duplicate accounts posting over and over and over again like it is a full time job. It's even worse on places like reddit or news site forums. At least here, you know that everyone is a real person since the primary purpose of the site is for supporting a sports team.