dgrochester55

"Read the constitution?" Let me give you a parallel to that comeback. If a crazy Christian Nationalist gave you a "hot take" arguing for Project 2025 and then said "read your Bible" as their counter, you would laugh because they have an interpretation of the Bible that is way off and not grounded in reality.?" Even if you read it, your view towards project 2025 would not change. Same applies in this scenario. If I "read the constitution", my opinion will stay the same. Parts of the constitution are interpreted differently, even by lawyers and judges. When it comes to the subject, you have an inaccurate interpretation of the constitution that is different from the majority. I see it differently, so does the Supreme court. End of story Sorry dems, but you cannot keep your thug. You will need to find a US citizen to be your next virtue signaling status symbol.

I'll take an actual document from congress.gov over a meme with a quote(that was likely out of context and/or strategically edited.) https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt5-6-2-2/ALDE_00013725/ More specifically, this was decided in 2015 by a left leaning at the time supreme court "U.S. citizens have also asserted that the exclusion of an alien has impinged upon their due process rights.9 In Kerry v. Din, five Justices in 2015 agreed that denying an immigrant visa to the husband of a U.S. citizen on the grounds that he was inadmissible under a provision of federal immigration law (pertaining to terrorist activities) did not violate the due process rights of the U.S. citizen spouse.10 These Justices differed in their reasoning, though. A three-Justice plurality held that the U.S. citizen spouse had no protected liberty interest under the Due Process Clause in her husband’s ability to come to the United States, and did not decide whether the government had established a facially legitimate and bona fide reason for excluding her husband.11 A two-Justice concurrence did not reach the question of whether the U.S. citizen wife had asserted a protected liberty interest, but instead concluded that the consular officials’ citation of a particular statutory ground for inadmissibility as the basis for denying the visa application satisfied due process under Mandel, which requires only that the government state a facially legitimate and bona fide reason for the denial.12" For the most part, 5th amendment rights are not seen as applying to undocumented. There are individual cases where it has applied, but it is not a default or an inheret right. It took a scroll down past about 20 leftist opinions column on Google, but I was able to find it.

The four or five (or maybe one or two with multiple accounts) far lefty regulars have been posting TDS propaganda 24/7 for three weeks straight with no sleep since the tariffs were announced. That is about it.

At worst, he was an ms-13 thug, at best, he was a wife beater who snuck in here illegally. I have a question for you. I do not get the far left mentality, is it misguided compassion that is so naive that they do not think that crime exists outside of their bubble or is it a deliberate desire to see chaos in this country so that it can start over with a reset in their image? Help me understand where your ideology is coming from.

What about the other things and what if that applies if only as an exception to what might be if it could be in that what might apply, what if it maybe could be what if it was also what if maybe what if what if? See how your deflection looked to us now? Lets try to talk about the criminals and those who broke the law to get being deported since this is the real topic and anything else is a red herring.

Nope, just a weak effort, maybe someone lower in intelligence or highly suggestible might get someone out of that but the sharper 90% of people on both sides of the spectrum would only see crap like this as not credible. It ignores that the deported "victims" criminals who never should have been here because they bypassed the rules, cherry picks from a religion while trolling it's followers and compares apples to oranges. Just another piece of useless propaganda with no other intent but to divide. Low brow and trashy in my opinion.

The WWJD card? Really? Weak effort.

Do you really think that Trump did this because he is against education? Disagreeing with the decision is one thing, but then you get into the childish hyperbole that everyone else not on the far left is sick of. For example, the foreign students expelled were not just "here to study." lets be honest, the real reason for the deportation is that they incited protesting and possible anti-semitic behavior. Whether or not it what they did was enough to warrant a deportation is a valid conversation, but acting like they were just regular students only here to study is dishonest and dismissive. The real question is, does a university with a $51 billion dollar endowment need $2 billion a year and should certain actions partially or fully exempt them from that money? For a party that is so for "taxing the rich" as the one and only solution to reduce the deficit, shouldn't you be thrilled that someone with $51 billion is not getting $2 billion more every year?

Honestly, it is a conversation that many in the evangelical Christian community need to have. By default, I am for a church or other religious organization being tax exempt, but so many megachurches have exploited these loopholes and created mini empires that give their leaders millions. I am for the core portions of churches being exempt, but they need to set a tax exemption cap or make churches have the same financial transparency requirements as other non-profits. That is not "persecution", that is common sense and something that should be talked about more.

To the democrat party.

The person who called you out is about as against Trump as anyone here and even they don't like what you did. I know that out of context half quotes goes hand in hand with TDS, but when one of your people call you out, maybe you should so quick to dismiss them. Cut the crap.

Dude, finding one examples of a sob story does not mean that the other thousands of instances did not happen..

Good point, now tell that to the terrorists creating pogroms at Ivy league universities over the past two years.

Worst case scenario would be going back to the strategy of the drought era and trading up to reach for a player that they could have probably had equal value on if they waited. Regardless of what happens, we can all count on looking through the threads and posts over the draft weekend about how Buffalo will never get to the next level because they drafted an interior lineman in the 5th or 6th instead of that projected 2nd rounder at CB, WR or RB (that the poster usually never heard of until that day) who fell three rounds due to character or injury issues. Its a draft weekend rite of passage.

If I have learned anything from the news between 2021-2024, the dow going up 2000 automatically means that the economy is better than ever. Right?

This is not about Trump or the inconsistent values of some MAGA Evangelicals. Again, I only address the original topic which was roundy's love for violence against women? Deflections are for cowards and people with flimsy stances. Either address the original topic or there is nothing to discuss. It is as simple as that.

Doubling down with lazy religious stereotypes, nice! So, since the original topic was not addressed by you, we agree that it was a deflection. Great, end of conversation.

I do not go down irrelevant rabbit trails, lets discuss the original topic and address that. I made a comment about another poster sharing a tweet where someone thought a man slapping a woman was hilarious and that they should have done worse to her. You replied with cheap deflection using a weak lamea$$, played out comeback from eight years ago. Even for a TDS person, that was a poor effort. Just admit that it was a stupid deflection unless you want to admit that you also advocate violence against women. Now go back to blurring reality with your delusion and hunkering down for the US invasion (which 99 percent of us with common sense know will never happen) that you have let your media trick in into fearing and pass the time with TDS posts here while you wait.

I think that the person who is the self admitted troll has no business calling anyone useless or idiotic.

and today also is the one week anniversary of nutcases on the left destroying Tesla's and the less that one day anniversary of far left terrorists trapping and terrorizing people at Grand Central station in order to endorse Palestinian acts of terrorism and try to bring a little slice of home over here. Many milestones to celebrate. Absolutely agree, everything that you say is pointless.

Looks like you grabbed the 2017 version of the TDS trolling script by accident. Try something more current like tariffs or defending the rights of ms-13 gang members to live in the US as undocumented freeloaders.

I'm not surprised. One of our own lefties here thinks that videos of men slapping women for having an opposing viewpoint is a "funny meme."

Over the past few days, you shared a post with someone calling people the r-word and then shared a post advocating men beating women. This is a disturbing pattern. That is not a projection, that is an observation. I will let others individually decide what they think of that.