dgrochester55

As a recent poster just proved, some will, but it give the other side a chance to prove that they do not need to stoop to that level. I figured that a few awful human beings with dark tetrad traits like you would say this but also realize that you are not the norm, even within the left population. I feel sad for you that you have this much hate inside. I hope that others here who do not care for Trump have more class and character than you. I thought of this and wondered if this was not the real reason that he dropped out, but it is also possible that it may not be the case. There are some less common aggressive forms of prostate cancer that can spread rapidly.

Cancer sucks and I don't wish it on anyone. Here is hoping for a successful treatment and recovery for Biden.

That is to be expected from that individual poster. I initially thought that Trump's tariffs were way too much to soon and still have questions, but things are recovering much faster than expected. The left is so desperate that all they can do now is call the deals in the Middle east "taking bribes" and dig in further into how a recession is imminent despite increasing evidence that it may not be. It just takes one person at a time to see through the lies and realize that they have nothing to offer for the party to eventually realize the error of their ways and go towards a more rational moderate ideology. The problem is the the TBD TDS clique members would rather see the country go into complete chaos and peril than ever admit that Trump did something correctly. Imagine spending months doing nothing on your free time but posting about how something is bad only to be wrong? They would be even more miserable than normal if these tariff plans actually end up working.

Not surprised to the see typical lefty TBD TDS clique being critical about lowering prescription drug prices. If Trump did it, it must be bad. How rude of Trump to interrupt their 40 day 24/7 circle jerk about the tariffs. If Trump banned prescription drug commercials they would probably try to argue how much everyone loves watching them. If prices actually go down, they would probably try to continue to pay higher costs on principle?

Late 2004 against the Browns. Up until the last game of the season against the Steelers backups, that Buffalo squad in the second half was about as on fire as I remember any Bills team being. The Browns game was the best in the bunch with a 37-7 blowout where Buffalo had Cleveland held to negative yards until a few garbage yards at the end got them in the positive. We all know how that season ended, but at that point watching that game, I felt like Buffalo could not only break the drought, but make a deep playoff run.

I can see why Cleveland is doing this. I wish that Buffalo had done this more often during the drought era. As bleak as the QB room looks in Cleveland, it was much worse in some years here. Buffalo would rest their laurels on Tyler Thigpen or Jeff Tuel as competition for a shaky starter for years. When they finally did something similar to what Cleveland is doing in 2015 with EJ Manual, Tyrod Taylor and Matt Cassel, they ending up improving their situation from past year by discovering Tyrod who was the best that we had in awhile before Allen came around.

I like this as a low key signing. Moore showed flashes in his first year with the Jets and was productive a couple of years ago in Cleveland when Flacco was at QB. It would be interesting to see what he can do with an offense that doesn't have a dumpster fire situation at quarterback.

Yes.

A First round pick from last year who was doing okay until he got injured is already beyond hope, but a 4th rd pick who has yet to see an NFL field is the difference between the Super Bowl and another early exit?

A, I do not know enough about the players to criticize or praise them, but the positions filled and the types of players selected to fill them were logically sound. There are some valid arguments about how we could have selected WR, but I feel a lot better about Samuel, Coleman and Palmer that I did about our CB and Defensive line depth before today.

6th round........of the 2026 draft.

Taking what was thought to be a top 5 pick in round 5 is a good risk for Cleveland. This is unprecedented to have someone projected that high fall that far down so quickly. The closest parallel that I could think of was Maurice Clarett about 20 years ago and that was for a more concrete reason.

I always love learning every draft day how the difference between a Super Bowl run and fading into obscurity is solely dependent on which person that everyone already passed over three or more times is selected. Last year, it was because we didn't draft Tony Franklin in round 4.

It remains to be seen how these players work out, but i am glad to see positions of need being filled. Getting someone with high upside like Walker in the 4th is something that I am on board with.

That would be like asking my cat to teach me quantum physics.

Honesty with a late round pick, why not? You can develop him for a couple of years and trade him down the road.

Seven years later from the original post, and democrat politics have gotten worse. Typical online arguing with Dems in 2025. Normal poster: I prefer tart tasting apples to sweeter tasting ones Karen Dunning-Kruger: I don’t like tart apples, what are you an idiot? Normal poster: No, I just prefer the taste Karen Dunning-Kruger: But it says here that more people prefer oranges, what the hell is your problem? Normal Poster: I thought we were talking about apples Karen Dunning-Kruger: Don’t change the subject, oranges with thicker rinds are sweeter! Normal Poster: What does that have to do with this? Karen Dunning-Kruger: Are you a botanist? How dare you question scientific research! Normal Poster: I don’t see what this has to do with apples Karen Dunning-Kruger: Stop gaslighting me!

If Cleveland gets Sanders anyway and the extra picks, they got over huge on this trade.

I would rather see the NFL overhaul their officiating and stop running an obnoxious amount of gambling app ads. Regardless of how much tampering if any is actually going on in the games, those two things combined are a bad look and leave it wide open for people to question them. As far as expanding the playoffs, I haven't seen enough competitiveness from the 7th seeds in the playoffs to make me think that adding an 8th or 9th team would enhance the experience.

I noticed that a large portion of the Climate change narrative faded after they tried to blame the Maui fires on it two years ago and it blew up in their face. Shortly before that, Canadian wildfires covering most of the northeast in smoke were blamed on climate change but we later found out that Canada was grossly undermanned to fight it and allegedly that Trudeau had instructed his firefighters not to battle the fire. In early 2020 before COVID the Australian wildfires pitched as "Indisputable proof of climate change" ended up being at least partially due to arsonists. Not only does this look bad, but it resulted in half or more of the population wanted nothing to do with environmental conservation at all. That is a shame because there are numerous issues with pollution and we should all do our part. If climate change is real and human caused, no one wants anything to do with the current preventative plans because all they saw was virtue signaling, hypocrisy and a giant scheme to give China massive profits. My personal take is that I will take the climate change threat seriously when celebrities and politicians are no longer allowed to fly private jets.

Caring about human rights means that your intentions are at least good. Human rights does not mean absence of consequences. For example, I would have an inherent right to not be assaulted by you, but if I was to break into your house, that changes that and you have a right to defend yourself in that scenario. This person broke the law by coming here and that at the very least beating his wife and driving without a license and likely but allegedly at this point was in MS-13. Any other county would deport someone who entered illegally and committed crimes. Why is the US doing that a sudden violation of human rights? His rights do not allow him a free pass to violate the rights of others. Edit: Since progressives sometimes have trouble comprehending figurative vs literal when reading, let me add that the breaking in to your house sentence was meant as an analogy and not a literal threat.

My hot take is that if Trent Edwards had not been obliterated by that cheap shot in the Cardinals game, that he may have become a decent to above average game manager quarterback for a few years. He was never the same after that.

"Read the constitution?" Let me give you a parallel to that comeback. If a crazy Christian Nationalist gave you a "hot take" arguing for Project 2025 and then said "read your Bible" as their counter, you would laugh because they have an interpretation of the Bible that is way off and not grounded in reality.?" Even if you read it, your view towards project 2025 would not change. Same applies in this scenario. If I "read the constitution", my opinion will stay the same. Parts of the constitution are interpreted differently, even by lawyers and judges. When it comes to the subject, you have an inaccurate interpretation of the constitution that is different from the majority. I see it differently, so does the Supreme court. End of story Sorry dems, but you cannot keep your thug. You will need to find a US citizen to be your next virtue signaling status symbol.

I'll take an actual document from congress.gov over a meme with a quote(that was likely out of context and/or strategically edited.) https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt5-6-2-2/ALDE_00013725/ More specifically, this was decided in 2015 by a left leaning at the time supreme court "U.S. citizens have also asserted that the exclusion of an alien has impinged upon their due process rights.9 In Kerry v. Din, five Justices in 2015 agreed that denying an immigrant visa to the husband of a U.S. citizen on the grounds that he was inadmissible under a provision of federal immigration law (pertaining to terrorist activities) did not violate the due process rights of the U.S. citizen spouse.10 These Justices differed in their reasoning, though. A three-Justice plurality held that the U.S. citizen spouse had no protected liberty interest under the Due Process Clause in her husband’s ability to come to the United States, and did not decide whether the government had established a facially legitimate and bona fide reason for excluding her husband.11 A two-Justice concurrence did not reach the question of whether the U.S. citizen wife had asserted a protected liberty interest, but instead concluded that the consular officials’ citation of a particular statutory ground for inadmissibility as the basis for denying the visa application satisfied due process under Mandel, which requires only that the government state a facially legitimate and bona fide reason for the denial.12" For the most part, 5th amendment rights are not seen as applying to undocumented. There are individual cases where it has applied, but it is not a default or an inheret right. It took a scroll down past about 20 leftist opinions column on Google, but I was able to find it.