dgrochester55

Dems under Biden "Inflation is global, its only been three years, give it time" Dems under Trump "Eggs have been skyrocketing in price for the last three months, and trump has been for a whole month, impeach him!!!!"

The least talented player to start a game that I can remember was Justin Rogers at CB. During a game against the Jets where they gave up around 300 yards passing, Rogers was responsible for something like 260 of them. I would not answer him as worst of all time though because he was a 7th round pick in a starting role because of multiple injuries. Joe Dufek and Bruce Mathison at QB between Ferguson and Kelly could also be considered here. My choice for worst player would have to be Aaron Maybin. Some players like Peterman, Bennie Anderson and JP Losman at least played well enough to earn and extended starting role at some point. Others like Justin Rogers, Keith Ellison and Jeff Tuel were Practice Squad caliber players at best thrust into a starting role. Maybin was a first round draft pick who could not even get on the field. I forgot where i heard it, but it was understood that had he not been their first rounder, than he would have likely been cut in the first season. He was not only bad, but had a poor attitude and work ethic. When you consider how much of a need DE was and how he could not see the field on a defense that was giving up 30-40 points a game nearly every week, that makes this the clear obvious choice in my opinion.

CNN, and NBCNews use the same philosophy. Who cares if it is fake? Even if we retract it, the masses believe that it is real, the intent was fulfilled.

Is anything that I said inaccurate? Be honest when you answer that. I have no problem with an adult living their life as they choose, I just think that it is silly for most people to pretend that a man who decides to live as a woman is the same as a biological woman when they would most likely see it as a deal breaker in the dating scene. What about you? If you found yourself single and looking, and found out that a potential match was a Trans-Woman instead of biological one, would you still be interested? Regardless of the answer that you may reply with, only you know the real one.

The funniest thing about the trans movement is that 95 percent of the guys who say that a trans-woman is a woman would change their tune really fast if they ran into a Sheena/Funky Cold Medina situation. It is all virtue signaling and a desire to conform with the swarm

Agreed, Biden definitely was not leading. Any average person with his level of cognitive decline at the end, would have no doubt been in a full care nursing home. Trump for better or worse has been more active in the first month than Biden's four years combined. In retrospect, I feel a little bad for Biden. What his party did to him was elder abuse.

Biden's legacy will be the second worst President of all time behind James Buchanan, unless there is a civil war within the next year, then he would be the worst.

I think that it would physically kill him or some of the others here to ever admit that Trump did something right. That is what years of media conditioning does. It is very hard for people to learn to look at direct sources and form their own opinion. Most think that they have their own opinion, but when pressed have no more than "they are saying" I saw an article", "The news says" or at best, "muh research" which is googling for the top result that fits your narrative. When you have legacy media outlets lying and campaigning for one party for over a decade, this is the end result.

That's fair. I don't fully trust musk either. What i would ideally like to see is a shift to a bipartisan search (although I doubt the dems would cooperate) and transparency to the point where every single thing is viewable to the public. That would be enough to help offset the potential of Musk or Trump taking things too far with power in this. I understand a stance like "I just don't trust Musk/Trump to do it fairly." What annoys me is irrational thoughts acting as if overspending isn't a problem and the media purposely lying about this affecting social security. Overall, I would have much rather seen Trump than Harris, but don't care for him either. Given the choice, I decided that I would prefer a President who runs his mouth like an idiot, but actively works hard with an intent to improve the US than one who gives fuzzy happy platitudes, but does absolutely nothing. There is a slight chance that he goes off the rails, but I trust that if him or Musk were to ever get too power hungry, that enough Republicans would shift and get him out.

To the libs out there protesting DOGE like it is the end of the world. Do you think that the US has been inefficient in their spending over the past few decades? Is DOGE terrible to you because of who is behind it or what it consists of? If Obama or Biden did this, would you have still been against it? Personally, I can say that some things go beyond politics. I am fine with this regardless who the president is. Same way that I was glad to see Biden put through an infrastructure bill (despite the climate scheme pork.) No President is 100% good or 100% bad. Financial accountability and transparency in the government was desperately needed and the spending leaking out has proven it. Edit: One last request. They aren't going after our Social security, every cabinet member for any president is unelected and some wasteful spending was definitely uncovered, so don't play those three cards and give sensible replies only.

Three weeks into the term, it's already Trump's fault, but Biden needed more time after three years. This thread is so poorly written and obviously easy to disprove that it must be trolling. Edit: Nvm, I see who the OP is. It's trolling.

Wow, a cheap and baseless insult three days after the conversation ended? Try to make your trolling less obvious. Welcome to my ignore list. Edit: If I was sick, I would consult my Primary care provider. I would not try your Natty Ice and meth "treatment", and I would definitely not reach out to an old, unethical quack who is probably currently living in a third world county due to losing their license after "prescribing" too many opioids to themselves and their friends.

I am not deflecting, the question is very relevant. Are you against the misspending of tax dollars? The dems and media are trying to scare the masses into thinking "ThEy GoNnA tAkE mUh, SoSha LSeCoOriTeE!" but no on in their right mind should buy into that. This is resulting on MORE freed up money making it LESS likely for the need to cut vital services. Perhaps The victims of Helene and the wildfires would have had more aid if the money wasn't going towards proselytizing the LGBT lifestyle to other countries I know that many including you have been conditioned by the media to be 100% against Trump even if he cured cancer or made world peace, but if it was from someone else, would you be happy with reducing frivolous spending or helping disaster area residents? Or do you just prefer in general that your tax dollars are wasted?

You don't seem to like that Trump helped them. Would you have preferred that they didn't have assistance?

The US having a surplus would be positioned as "Trump hoards Millions in treasury! How Americans could lose ALL of their social services."

Done, Thanks I actually did try to have reasonable conversations with them at first last year, but every reply from them was deflect, insult "I'm a doctor". Best for me to move on and not engage.

Unfortunately, there is no block button and you initiated the first response to me today. If you do not like me or my opinions, stay the hell away from my posts, and this include your childish laughter emoji's.

Ladies and gentleman, another unsolicited Ted Talk from Dr. Dunning-Kruger.

I posted, you responded. Get it straight. If you are too senile to remember the order of posting after ten minutes, then maybe you aren't mentally fit to be here. You are nothing more than a bitter, ignorant old man and if you think that I am wrong on everything, this means that I am on the right track. People should strive to think opposite of you. You are a sad and bitter person and should be pitied.

He was my least favorite coach when here, but seemed like a nice person who genuinely cared for his players, He also had some success as a coordinator and player. RIP Dick Jauron, and my condolences to his family.

Anti_Christ? That's a new one for Trump. I'm used to Christian Nationalists and Penecostals calling Clinton and Obama that, but I've never seen a progressive try to play that card with Trump.

Get bent you commie quack. You aren't worth the time and effort to me anymore. Go back to sniffing nitrous oxide and trying to find a third world country that will still let you practice.

So that is how the media is trying to make the average person panic this week? "ThEy GoNaA sTeAl YuR pAys, Git Em!"

Libs were fine when Soros and Gates were doing it for the other side. The hypocrisy is obvious. Give it a rest.