Rodrigo Borgia

Fine. Take him at 10. Then, when he gets stonewalled by every offensive tackle he comes up against, and ends up like Maybin, don't say I didn't warn you.

"Sources have said they expect Reddick to go on Day 2 of the 2017 NFL Draft, but he is a project for the NFL because he will be playing a brand new position. Reddick's experience at his NFL position is limited to three practices and one exhibition game. Reddick came to Temple as a defensive back before being moved to the edge. He was basically a run-and-chase pursuit defender. At the Senior Bowl, Reddick had to move to outside linebacker, but he had a solid week of practice, flying around the field and being around the ball." - Walter Football

For those who are advocating taking this guy at 10... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDGyPRr9-AE

I rest my case Are you planning on changing your name to one of the following on night one of the draft after Trubisky is selected: Ryan L Brownz Ryan L Bearz Ryan L Jetz

I wasn't joking.

You could offer him a billion dollars over 2 years and he probably wouldn't take it to come here.

Let's see. For his entire career, Sherman has been living in SEATTLE, a city with an educated, upper-class fanbase, where he's been to the playoffs every year, and has played in 2 Super Bowls, one of which they won. Why would he want to give all that up to come HERE, with a less educated, low-class fanbase, where the odds of even making the playoffs, let alone playing in another Super Bowl, are pretty much slim to none?

I'm well aware of the fact that he's not a free agent. That said, he would have to accept a trade to come here, which I sincerely doubt he would. He would probably prefer to retire than come here.

This thread shouldn't have even been started. Just the idea that Richard Sherman would even consider coming here is laughable. BEYOND laughable, in fact.

What's a "looser?" Is that another word for Cheektowagan?

Then find another film. There are 31 other "films" that you can watch on Sundays going forward.

Why? Because he ran a 4.22 40?

TO was a 3rd round pick back in 1996. We're talking about someone to take 10th overall. Perhaps we should be looking at either Rashaun Simonise, or Danny Vandervoort with the 10th pick?

What happens when Corey Davis comes to the NFL, and he realizes that the corners he's going up against are actually good, and not pathetic, MAAC corners, like the ones he went up against from UB?

Brilliant. Why have one of the best wide receivers, when we can have the second or third best wide receivers?

Who would you prefer the QB to be? Trubisky? Ryan Mallett? Chase Daniel?

Only in your dreams will Jonathan Allen, Jamal Adams or Malik Hooker fall to 10. Foster and Davis will definitely be there, though.

The fans don't want him though. They want a QB, or trade down and take "The Next Rob Gronkowski," OJ Howard.

Two questions: 1. Would he be a good fit for an attacking 4-3 that McDermott wants to run, considering he played as a 3-4 OLB at Wisconsin? 2. Does he hate Doug Whaley as much as you do?

He won't come here.

Did you have a plan ready to go, in the event that Gilmore walked? If so, did you present this plan to the Pegulas?

The 10th overall pick, even if it is a QB, should start. Otherwise, it's a complete waste.