Jump to content

Watkins90

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,235
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Watkins90

  1. Then why did she call Brandin Cooks Brady's 'favorite receiver so far' in that video segment when Hogan is leading him in receptions, targets, red zone targets, and TDs?

    i haven’t seen the video you are referring to. Just because Brady throws to someone else more doesn’t mean Cooks can’t be his favorite target. Maybe Hogan is just open more because teams tend to play a safety over Cook. But to discredit her because of one little video isn’t sexist but shows you really didn’t do your homework.
  2.  

    I don't mind women in sports.

     

    But let's be real. They find hot chicks. They teach them what they need to know. They coach them on what to say. And, because they are professionals, they learn.

     

    I would bet my son's life on the fact that ZERO of the women on TV for football, were football enthusiasts growing up. They're entertainers and they've learned their parts.

     

    They don't know schit about running routes and Cam Newton knows it.

     

    Should he have said it? Perhaps not. Perhaps so.

     

    I applaud him, personally.

    Maybe we should do our homework before criticizing women reporters.

     

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/scott-fowler/article177107336.html

     

    I'm not saying all women reporters are like this, but this girl seems to be legit. Actually, loves football and tries to digest as much as possible.

     

    We sit here and praise the guys who watch the all-22 and give a breakdown. They all claim to not be coaches, yet we take their word for what they see. She never claimed to be a coach. She asked a question about routes and he blew her off like she didn't know anything because he thinks any women in sports doesn't know ****. While that might be the case with some, it ain't with all.

  3. He said what most men think,except he shouldn't have said it.

    He's just not very smart.

     

    He'd be better served to ignore asinine questions from all reporters.

    That wasn't an asinine question, but a rather nice thought out question. She asked him about Xs and Os, and he answered like, 'Well, your female, so you clearly can't have any clue about routes."

     

    so he found it funny. is she out there running routes? I took a quick look. no videos or evidence she does? okay, so she is a sports writer and I'm sure she has some familiarity of how the routes are run but it looks more like poking fun at her then insulting?

     

    like I said, sensitive reporter and the media is eating it up. I find it to be no big deal. now if he cussed, called her a whore or something like that. yes, that would be insulting.

     

     

    lets make a bunch of something out of nothing.

    Just because she never actually ran routes doesn't mean she doesn't know what she is talking about.

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/scott-fowler/article177107336.html#wgt=blogs

  4. What terrible bull **** penalties. Hyde engaged with the running back well before going out fo bounce, that isn't a late push he simply let the running back go. Then that roughing the passer, he actually let up and Trevor even went to the ground. Such bull ****. My god. We need all the help we can get and the refs just gifted them 30 yards for no real reason.

  5. What OC can look good when your QB does this on a ton of passing plays

     

    https://twitter.com/yardsperpass/status/909948976253800449

    Did he ever even look at that side of the field? Can't throw it where you can't see it. Not trying to be a TT apologist, just wondering where his progressions where. This isn't madden, you don't get to see every route develop at once.

     

    Not trying to defend him. I think he leaves a lot to be desired, but still think he is a better option that Peterman.

×
×
  • Create New...