Watkins90
-
Posts
2,481 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Watkins90
-
-
Touchdown!!! Bum knee and all.
-
Just now, John in Jax said:
They miss a LOT of holding calls...every...single...play...of every single game.
I know, but that one was very significant. They usually only call holding when it helps the play.
-
How they didn't call hold on that 3rd and 3 run by Cohen for the first down is beyond me. The Chicago guard tackled Wilkerson, which allowed Cohen to cut back for the first down.
1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:Still say Rogers has serious knee injury
It can't be that serious, or he wouldn't out there.
-
You guys can believe what you want. I don't think Mack, with the current roster we have, was worth two first round picks.
It was for the Bears because they already had key people in place. Mack is a luxury, not a necessity for them.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Ol Dirty B said:
No their aren't just other Mack's in upcoming drafts. Mack is a game breakers, does he win the game today? No. Because that was a !@#$ing **** show. But is he better than anyone we'll draft in the first round in the next 5 years? For sure
I don't understand this fanbase and this coaching staff's aversion to talent. You stack that ****.
You can make a beautiful scupture out of granite and you won't get ****. But you make a beautiful one out of marble and that **** is timeless.
There are HOF players in almost every draft class. you just have to go find them. That's the key.
-
2 minutes ago, Chemical said:
Hello? are you still there?
Yup. Mack will be a Hall of Fame player. The Bears have a stacked roster they made better with getting Mack. They could afford to not have two first round picks for him because of that.
If it would have just been a first and maybe a future second or third, yes. Go for it. But Buffalo is going to need all it can to improve this roster.
You guys act like Mack is coming off of several Super Bowl victories. The Raiders never made it out of the Wild Card without him.
If we got Mack and were still terrible this year and next. Everyone would be screaming that it was a stupid move around the draft.
-
1 minute ago, Bangarang said:
One of our major holes is pass rush which you instantly help a great deal. Who would want one of the best players on the NFL anyway?
Mack isn't going to make a difference on this roster. There are too many other weaknesses. There will be other Mack's in upcoming drafts. You just have to find them.
-
1 minute ago, Bangarang said:
We certainly couldn’t use a game changing guy like Mack. We need to hoard all of our draft picks so we can hope to draft a guy that probably won’t be half as productive.
With the number of holes on this roster, we couldn't afford to give up two first-round draft picks for Mack. We are going to need them. The Bears, don't feel they do because they have a solid roster.
-
1 minute ago, Buffalo Ballin said:
I draft another QB again if we get a Top 5 pick.
I don't know if anyone coming out looks like a top prospect.
Which, could be unfortunate for us. If Allen does look like a Franchise guy we could parlay our top pick into more picks for a QB desperate team trading up.
-
14 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:
Watkins>Benjamin
Dareus>Star
Glenn>anyone we have at RT
Darby>Our 2nd CB
Reading comprehension isn't strong with this one.
Watkins wasn't going to stay, and we weren't going to pay him what KC did.
Dareus was basically useless for the amount of money we were paying him.
Glenn couldn't stay healthy.
Darby is a head-scratcher. I don't know why they got rid of him. If read what the guy said, we had to get rid of some guys to get out of cap hell.
-
3 hours ago, Toledo Bill said:
Is he so unobservant and clueless during games that he cant tell they suck without watching the tape? He inspires no confidence. Loser
It's just coach speak for I'm not going to throw anyone under the bus. It's the same thing Bill B. except Bill B. will just say things like, we were bad. we were bad. we were bad.
-
1 minute ago, Bangarang said:
You don’t just blindly give a HC and GM the length of their contracts to get it right. You keep them if the results warrant it. If not then you move on.
So far, the result have warranted it. We made the playoffs last year. We ended the drought, while also blowing up the roster and getting rid of players who either underachieved compared to their contracts, weren't good scheme fits, or weren't going to stay in Buffalo anyway. After a bad game, the first game of the season, in McBeane's second year you just can't fire the coach and GM. You have to give them a chance to build the team. At least give them this year and then next to show improvement before deciding to dump them.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, dwight in philly said:
i get it but they were competetive . what i saw today was pathetic .. to say the least
They weren't competitive because of Tyrod.
-
Just now, dwight in philly said:
But they were in the game till the end!
Because Pittsburgh turned the ball over 6 times. One time started the Browns on the Steelers one, which ended in a one-play scoring drive on a run.
-
1
-
-
If Josh Allen is the franchise QB we have been looking for, we are at least 2 years from being a contender. We aren't going to be good this year. However, if we can see our young guys develop we'll be on our way. Let's not get carried away. Firing the coach and GM at this point, before they even have a chance to build the roster they want. We need to be patient. This year is lost, this year is about development.
We all know why they shipped away Tyrod. We saw that today vs. the Steelers. He was terrible.
-
Guys, he got a putrid team to the Playoffs last year. God, why do I even come here. The overreactions from one game is huge
-
1 minute ago, Domdab99 said:
I don't want these players on the team next year:
Offense:
Peterman
Benjamin
Clay
Holmes
Kerley
Ivory
the whole OL except Dawkins
Defense:
Hughes
Star
Murphy
Kyle Williams
Davis
Gaines
So, you basically always want to be terrible.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Anon Y. Mous said:
anyone surprised they missed the field goal?
That was blocked. It had to be tipped, Steve has the leg to easily make it there and it barely hit the endzone.
-
Peterman is so worried about throwing an INT, he isn't getting the ball out.
-
Peterman needs to throw that back shoulder. The defensive back is deep and in front of him.
-
Edmunds with the strip!!
-
The referees just always ignore whether or not a ball was catchable.
-
1 minute ago, McNubbins said:
It's only preseason...
oh wait.It's only the first drive of the season. Let's not completely overreact.
-
2
-
-
Refs already ****. Your supposed to blow the play dead on offsides. There aren't supposed to be free plays anymore.
SNF Packers vs Bears
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Wow!!