Buffarukus

what do you know of racism? im seriously asking. have you seen or felt it first hand? i grew up on the east side. i have alot of stories to tell on the matter. i also went to inner city schools on the metro straight into downtown. no nice yellow bus for me at my corner to take me directly to my schools front door. so just curious where your drawing your reference from on the topic seeing how it upsets you so much. what upsets me is its used so flippantly by these "journalists" and others that see it in harmless things. it should be mocked and discounted in these contexts EVERY SINGLE TIME and by EVERYONE yet, some are more then willing to allow others to water down the term (racism) until its unrecognizable. EVERYTHING is considered it now and you seem more then happy to allow it.

keep going alot more topics. those who are not zealots need voices to unplug from the mainstream narratives of hate. it wasnt to long ago where disagreement did not make you a enemy and simply saying i think this side represents me but i also agree with you that they are not doing the right thing here.

yeah ive seen that and was a big fan of Stewart. i miss him. im a big supporter of his fight for 911 workers. i didnt watch crossfire much. rising is different as its two moderate hosts together and they just present some stories from their takes. no major debates. no sensationalism and mostly agree on the foundation of the topic presented but at least you can hear some objections without the I'm absolutely right your wrong or demeaning attacks towards each other, besides towards the crazy op eds and media and corrupt government general rediculousness. here's just a random one. lots of daily topics. check it out and share if you think its ok. more views is the only thing that will change direction.

i like rising on youtube setup. a democrat, a republican both telling their side and GASP! calling out their own as well without bickering or name calling. its a pretty balanced show that emphasizes the people vs the corruption instead of trying to have us at each others throats constantly.

youz aint welcome in this here establishment. these is for us. we likes our segreegations. go somwhere else and be with yer own kind if youz wants that content of character not color of skin malarkey. sounds more symbiotic if you give a historical deep southern drawl to it.

nothing like promoting segregation to try and preserve those preconceived notions and stereotypes. they must stay intact otherwise how can you fight against them later. wouldn't want to force others to be uncomfortable when they discover everything they may have been told by people that look like them was a lie. lets protect that! its funny that people talk about being on the right side of history look the other way as institutions try to regress to the worst parts of it openly.

you know thats a excellent question. ill have to circle back on that one and answer that at a later time.

so i brought up numerous topics and examples in regards to censorship that should concern anyone, regardless of politics. the best you can do is to cut and paste a tweet that again, has nothing to do with the OP or censorship or anything i said. hand the phone back to dad. this discussion is obviously over your head and you have nothing of value to say.

"You know why they're still allowed - they haven't violated the terms and conditions agreed to." so this is why i brought up the tim pool discussion. they discuss these topics and how the TOS itself is biased towards a set view points where real debates and ideas are discriminatory towards one set. not by JUST there rules, but by thier implentation as well. the issues were discussed a year ago with them acknowledging as such. unfortunatly the same issues exist so they cannot even use the ignorance excuse. its on purpose. but as long as the biggest names are there. a condensed snipbit is here if the 3 hours is to much. so i gave a real world list of censorship that does not pertain to twitter but the examples are the very tip. you barley touched apon them. a book on negative implications of transgenderism in teenagers was called to be banned by the ACLU! as far as i know its a well researched book but admit i did not read it. ill repeat the CIVIL LIBERTY UNION wanted to silence someone's research on a topic. i guess parents should not be privy to the whole issue that might effect their children because there are no negatives to taking hormones and needing irriversable surguries. https://dailycaller.com/2020/11/16/aclu-chase-strangio-abigail-shrier-transgenderism-book-target-amazon/ ill skip ahead. calling for the firing of opinion editor for allowing a conservative to have a opinion is different, but unlike others ill explain why, firing a REPORTER that is exhibiting bias is a necessity we sorely lack today. i took a semester in media literacy in college. what was pounded in my head was a professionalism that is long gone. journalistic ethics and standards. its like a terms of service if you wish to be a good journalist. the new york time claims to be fair and unbiased unlike many other outlets that have specific slants. so out of these two people who were fired who violated these ethics? why are supposedly unbiased news organizations rallying to fire people simply for platforming specific viewpoints? why did they fire him? what was his mistake? disrupting the echo chamber? seems so. bari weiss made it pretty clear what was happening and IS happening in many other industries as well. groupthink that is intolerant of any opposition. read for yourself https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter the real world doesn't follow twitter TOS guidelines but it certainly seems to applaud censorship and cancelling just the same.

well thats debatable. i dont tweet but there have been plenty of people accusing that has happened. a good point brought up by tim pool talking with dorsey on joe rogan..another ALT RIGHT person who has continuously been attacked and averted attempts of censorship (i suggest you watch to get another point of view). so the most influencial voices arent being silenced? books have been banned from selling for pointing out some of the negatives of transgenderism in teenagers.ben shapiro..a pretty moderate conservative is being mobbed to remove a write up from politico. POLITICO! a publication made to discuss poitics. the new york times staff was appalled to have a OPINION piece by a sitting senator due to him advocating using federal troops to maintain order in portland.. then we have 20000 used to maintain order for the inauguration. yaay! the opinion editor was FIRED! bet they won't make that agregious mistake again. its been far beyond twitter for awhile. like i said calls for violence should be stopped but this isnt that and its swinging left as well. this is road NOONE should be advicating. used to? no...i do now and always. but yeah that was our jist.

thats easy to say when you dont pay attention. the one sided banning was going on long before trump. the fact they deleted trump but allow many other dictators to spew hatred to stay just brought the hypocracy to the front page so you can read the headlines. which is all i think you read.

um ok. good to know. did they switch it to the patriot party lol? not sure what your saying? this topic is about censorship and companies removing a political party that simply have a different view point by using the insurrection. im a old school democrat. we used to believe in human rights and that includes freedom of speech. we weren't afraid of debate. we fought for workers rights and were against multinational corporations working in tandem with our government ( see occupy wallstreet ). so when i see giant technology companies systematically eliminating conservative voices WORKING IN TADEM WITH THE GOVERNMENT for no other reason then they disagree..its dangerous and a complete 180 from what i stand for. break the law or call for violence fine. censor just cause they are conservative...yeah, not cheering that $#/+ on. maybe im passed my time but freedom of speach is not a fad.

k. good talk.

i don't like to generalize and am interested in clarity which is why im asking questions. if a terms of service was broken id like to read about it, or if the organization was committing criminal activity, I'd also like to hear it. no i think it was pretty dumb not to bake a cake based only on somones sexual prefrances. money is money and a cake is a cake. are you using this to deflect from the questions i asked? not sure what the two have to do with each other? a tos is offered for one that i haven't heard was broken

sure. by originated from do you mean straka or washington d.c. on the day of the riot?

i read the affidavit. straka was at the capital and posting on his private twitter account. so as a founder of #walkaway do his personal actions automatically become relagated to the organization he founded? a relavent question of why #walkaway was censored before he was even charged or at least explanation of how #walkaway platform was used in the attack? its a important question and i am not defending straka for his actions. is it ok to condemn the foundation on the actions of the founder? is the fbi sharing info with twitter on who they are investigating so they can preemptively delete the account? im seriously asking? as i dont follow #walkaway. maybe it was a front for straka to gain zelots on his private account and they were there committing crimes. if not, then its removal is wrong, or we need to have the same standards for ALOT more companies and organizations. the news is full of high ranking ceo and owners committing crimes of all ranges, but we remove that person from that at which they are in control of we do not destroy and condemn the organization itself ESPECIALLY before convicted in a court of law.

its bull. guys are scared senseless to touch a guy if a toe goes out so ill cut. its like fake sliding to take advantage of the strictness of the rule and guys slowing.

so reading through this im glad that even democrat aligned people are on board with demanding more secure measures to the election..another topic that should not have any politics involved. for those that are saying its all a hoax. wheres the evidence? there is some out there if you look but at the same time voter fraud, especially with the mail in would be extremely hard to trace back and single out a individual/s to prosecute and media/fact check seem to only want WIDESPREAD fraud that can overturn election results. as for just fraud in general. this woman is only being investigated due to project veritas and having her directly on camera. i suggest watching it and asking how many more could there be? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-woman-arrested-on-election-fraud-charges-based-on-project-veritas-video/ar-BB1cJ5tk i mean, everyone had a good chuckle when recounts found ballots in bidens favor. noone seemed upset that there were thousands of votes that otherwise would not have counted at all. people say dominion machines are a hoax as well. Dec. 13 forensic audit by an INDEPENDENT group concluded that Dominion machines were “intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.” Specifically, the report by Allied Security Operations Group said “the system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors,” often forcing the ballots to be “adjudicated,” or manually scrutinized by an election worker. https://www.westernjournal.com/michigan-recount-confirms-trump-won-county-went-biden/ we can go into in the democrats own primaries THIS PAST YEAR. i think i wrote the full list of shame from the democrats on this forum, but most notable is voting software SHADOW INC. just another shady software connected to the man who declared a early victory in Iowa, nothing to see here. so yeah democrats and republicans should be united in all efforts to secure elections. alot of good ideas here but alot require software. i have to think we need to do something that does not involve computers because as of now there is ZERO confidence ( correctly or conspiracy) in our elections when it comes to computer tallies. which is a good thing in the long run...if politicians even care to address it.

instead of complaining about a particular mainstream media news source...fox, msn, cnn...ect ect (they are all sensationalized biased garbage) why not share what you feel is a solid news source? ill start. i think (rising) on youtube is a very fair balanced place to get political news. a liberal and a consevative share the platform so you get both sides and AMAZINGLY report what they don't like IN THEIR OWN PARTY! 😱😱😱😱 so i started. whats everyone else got?

two wrongs don't make a right. we agree. but two wrongs definitely make a wrong. as long as you look at the situations without the force fed narratives or any internal bias, that's all i can ask for. that's a good compromise and a good start to end the polarization. ill give you credit for admitting to not fully reading my post and engaging in a conversation many others avoid.

watch the video i posted where black people were against the attack. in your head try to figure out how attacking a federal courthouse helps social justice. watch the video of ted wheeler standing at said courthouse. when it comes together..get back at me.

sigh...im not here to defend trump. thats not a call to violence. actually read all the posts i wrote if you want my stance. its like i have to rehash for every person that decides to chime in.

you react but.. dont read. edit: actually ITS A VIDEO!!

lol yeah. you "missed" when he went up to the gate in solidarity after weeks of "protests" lets play that game. where did trump call for direct violence? i missed it.

this is disingenuous. i litterally named ted wheeler. told you how he stood at the federal courthouse gates in solidarity with antifa. showed A VIDEO of how black people thought storming a federal building was derailing the message, you know, where ted wheeler was . have said how democratic leaders ignored antifa claiming they are a myth. https://nypost.com/2020/07/27/jerry-nadler-calls-violence-from-antifa-in-portland-a-myth/ gave the name of the unarmed man shot by them after they were repeatedly allowed to gather and ignored. repeatedly advertised on twitter, which was never removed after repeated nights of violence. but why wont i name anyone!!! its different!! only one was disinformation!! these are random!! it happened blocks away from the widespread looting!! like i said im done "proving". no matter what i say or how i say it there will always be a excuse for your side and condemnation for the other. i explained my point as best i can. now im just reiterating and repeating. plenty of info to look into..before its removed but your not interested in it.