Buffarukus

i think the question is not are individuals but what is the parties stance from where people seek leadership. read my response above for examples of democratic actions that has to this point been forgotten. "summer of love" was annouced for the CHOP and allowed to exist until a teenager was murdered. dem gov marched up with rioters to the federal courthouse to show solidarity with criminals who were throwing molitoves locking doors and trying to burn people alive in the buildings trump actually sent fed help to chicago to help clear up the spiking violence it worked. the dems still reputed it as fascist takeover and most refused!!! how many additional people died due to dems political bias and democratic refusal to get the rioting under control. i could go on and on. what is closely comparable? JAN 6th!! JAN 6th!! oh the day that was immediately denounced by rep and anyone involved is under strict prosecution? it was stupid of trump to do and i hope he loses in the primaries but what else are we talking about? +6 years media been talking about dog whistles and greatest threats to the country. alot of MAGA losses in the mid terms. still waiting on all this threat crap from election denials. still seeing dems desperate to pin any all violence on rep to the point we have countless lies. smollett, nooses in nascar, pelosi... you name it. just today they are saying the colorado shooter was a trans himself. take a day or two and they look like jacka$$[$ and STILL pray the next maniac can be that maga demon they all been waiting on so they can collect more power. its truley sick. so someone PLEASE explain what am i missing that makes the two comparable?

democrats were litterally bailing out rioters..that proves they were never for peaceful protests storefronts were boarding up in cities in case trump won. dems dont even acknowledge the existence of antifa let alone try to stop their violent gatherings. but proudboys!!!! blm broke down barriers at the white house. attacked police. set fire to st johns church. and the reaction by dems was. lol the president had to go into a bunker..what a coward! lollollolol. they took over many capital buildings and police stations while stealing land and setting up their own violent racist little armed communities. nothing terroristic about that. but of coarse instantly switch to storming capitals is the biggest threat on democracy!! im shaking with tears by these magas and there buffalo outfits who had doors opened. 🙄 please. only difference? most if not all the perpetrators were all actually hunted down and prosecuted for that one. mass looting is justified as " just getting bread for starving children" and " they are taking reparations". so now at a point steal $999 and we might hand you a ticket if we ever catch you lets advocate people to go to supreme court judges homes and even after a plot to kidnap is stopped we will keep advocating. what could go wrong on and on but yeah just a few minor isolated incidents is what your going with? what percentage of the 90% do you think your posts make up?

i completely agree and the bolded sounds like the beginning of a actual plan yet this issue is something that has not been touched by rep. too much " your problem not mine" hindsight qbing of other peoples problems. that message doesn't compete at all with "ill knock 20 g off your loan" and possibly more to come. never will. over 20 million people applied for forgiveness. thats alot of votes. how many more are currently in college that are hoping more bills like this get rammed through include parents of these kids and you may have a red wave that never was. even if bidens giveaway does not go through its Rs who can be blamed. it always was a win/win scenario. dems are great at those cause they can always count on Rs to block them, look like the bad guy...and nothing more. at some point simply "conserving" the broken system you outlined is actually worse then saying nothing at all. Rs need to pander. not by giving away money but by actually offering solutions. for example. hold the colleges responsible. kid doesn't come out and make the low end of the average salary you dictated with the degree and kids makes a honest job search..the kids tuition gets slashed. college pays the gov back. id think it would mean less phoney lib art degrees, more active engagement for college to be involved with kids job hunt or at the very least colleges being upfront and honest about a degrees earning potential before a check clears. maybe a dumb idea but ITS SOMETHING which is alot more then Rs even SPEAK about, let alone do! stopping the libs alone is not a winning strategy. its getting old.

is leaking supreme court decisions a serious threat now or something? recent history says first you leak a decision. but you also should announce that everyone who can take a hour from there full time careers should go to the judges home to scream about the leak as well. so showing up and yelling at judges and their families kind of leaks are good. just leak. bad? i dunno, a smidge of violent kidnapping plot didnt really come across as good but the white house still green lit the doxxing party. pardon my slow and consistant eye roll on the fact you guys suddenly care about (potential) leaks from 8 years ago.

my view on this issue is the same as when i was a liberal in the past. the dems are going about addressing this the wrong way and as usual republicans are complaining about it but have no plan of their own. obama care! still waiting on the republican healthcare plan. if the train we are on is careening off a cliff im not going to b!+ch at someone who decides to pull a lever. republicans far to often happy to sit back and wait for the crash and i think even see a alot of joy in the show when they arent on it. Rs better start coming up with some actual solutions or the dems WILL keep pushing these kinds of solutions. in most instances its the only choice on the table.

i deal with trouble shooting plc logic. does that count? you a company owner?

prob one that replaces 75% of its workforce that can't answer whether they will actually go to work to work.

epstein cameras conviently go down? why? epstein client lists? who? fauci lies? big pharma lies? hunters labtop? joes involvement? ppp money being stolen? contents of bidens daughter diary that initiated journalist doors getting kicked in? blm money being stolen? Russia er i mean Ukraine i mean who knows who is bombing poland? nordstream terrorist attacks by? ftx fraud funneling money to democrats? investigations? again Pelosi cameras go out? body cam? reporters suspended for reporting inconvenient facts? ray epps leniency? on and on. add it to the pile of things we will probably never get real answers to. "we do not talk about ongoing aka shutup investigations".

if you listen to Brianna joy grey speak and alot of other progressives (shes in a quote a few right above your message)... or other people who actually do want loan forgiveness (krystal ball ect ect) they brought up more sound laws that biden could have used to get this done. they been questioning why biden used such a very weak emergency order to try to achieve this and had HUGE doubts it would hold up. seeing as biden has access to the top lawyers in the country one has to think if this does not pass it was intentional to con voters. I'm no lawyer but seeing as what they said would happen has been halted by the courts relatively quickly. no reason to think they were wrong.

i agree. i think trump as a fixture is no where close to being a effective means. i pray for this country trump gives it up already. the dems funded those canidates and it worked out. at the same time the dems litterally lied about EVERYTHING about covid. im am shocked that people did not see that as a leadership flaw. i have no choice but to think alot of them were on board and dont really want answers to alot of questions on how much was a lie..because it would also expose themselves for rolling with it. not easy to digest the fact you stunted your kids learning or participated in a drive by funeral ect ect and put up no resistance when you could have while demonizing those who did. wrong side of history but history is written by the victors. the only major effect it had in this election were freedom states swung big red. no more swinging florida. people appreciate just how close they came from living in fear and losing basic things like the rest of the country. who seems to have stock home syndrome.

yeah but the metrics. economy. crime. gas. these arent little things. they effect everyone everyday. regardless of who was running against them or why you would think it would be enough to have people want a drastic change no matter what it is. i think abortion got women out and i dont think enough credit was given to student loan forgiveness which got the young people out when they typically wouldnt. even if it doesnt effect them it prob does to someone they know or are hoping for more when they grad.

ill interject a sec. just scanning so pay no mind. but lost in the debate is the perceived third party that is constantly not included in a abortion debate. a directly effected one. using religion as a means to defend that party that cant speak for itself as a moral compass as its voice is a worthy seat at the table...or no? if not. what is? anything that cannot defend itself will need a outsider to defend it using a reason..religion is just one. otherwise who cares about anything thats not happening directly to them.

singletary is pretty good. nothing elite but not many are. what he lacks in speed he makes up in broken tackles. not sure why he gets a bad rap by fans. i think edmunds is average. we can keep waiting on the ceiling but im tired of the excuses. he has a good line in front of him and it seems the same result. i think his pass coverage is better then people give credit for but he just cant make big plays in either. not sure why you say this. guy litterally ran 30 yards down field to save a touchdown he had no buisness getting to. hes a very good dt imo and hope we extend him.

eh was more rhetorical if anyone else thought the personnel swapping was a detriment to the offense and effecting the consistancy we are seeing a lack of from guys. people are saying McKenzie in for man and shakir for zone but its not like we put guys in knowing what defensive play they are going to play until we motion. if its about opponents tendency then we would see 1 guy in the whole game to counter the team or cb.

i agree with this. id think poyer was a proven commodity worth a early extension if you want to secure talent. i was never in the knox is garbage club many were but he litterally just became a threat in the passing game for the first time his ENTIRE career not long ago. i get he has a high ceiling but there wouldn't be a desperate need by this team for a pass catching rb if knox showed the promise of being a outlet he was trending towards. coaches or knoxs? either way here's to josh and knox getting that connection back we have seen in the past.

what percentage is he in on when we are in 3 wide sets? i think your right but i think the team is being extremely strange at the way they are not allowing players to get any consistency in games. McKenzie in one play now shakir. no now mckenzie. no we need a rb to split wide in the slot. pick the best player for the slot and let him play. maybe im wrong but i thought the coaches created a similar mess with the rb situation until recently. we seemed to be just swapping rbs around almost randomly. alot of rbs need consistent reps to get going and even when we gashed teams on the ground we either randomly swapped out singletary just as he was hitting his stride or completely abandoned the run altogether even if the situation required us to run clock. now we needed a cook 2.0? he seems to be doing pretty good as a #2 and i dont even see him split wide for a rb who supposedly was selected for his phenomenal route running catching ability? O is having real issues. O line musical chairs we played almost game by game mult seasons. our D by contrast puts young guys out and that's it. lets em play. make mistakes. good/bad it will make them better when we need em most and let us know what we got.

we did? what was the moment you thought we needed a wr 10 months ago? gabe seemed to take advantage of every opportunity prev seasons and had a career setting game the last time we saw him. im not sure what happening this year. yes hes #2 and getting more attention but hes missing alot of balls right in his hands and not attacking contested balls. spectacular one play and horrible the next. guy has all the tools but can't stay consistent. i rolled my eyes at the obj talk but yeah...ill take him in a heartbeat at this point.

he cant. the end is near. the death flail of a cult extinguishing is a interesting sight to behold. a red red wave is about to wash ashore alot of investigations that were on hold. so sit back and enjoy the show chef. if twitter guy "mike" with 1 like deserves its own thread. then there will be many many more to come. brew the coffee billsy and get comfortable. you only have a few days left to push the narrative.

your reaching. gay wasn't even a word on any of the three things you mentioned in the paragraph you wrote this for. if you want to avoid my points about mental disorders and how we treat them in society, just do it. no need to completely change the topic and put words in my mouth. i dont think you would. for someone who earlier in the thread disregarded what i said about media being left wing biased there sure are alot of examples of leftists who demonize any and all of the info your asking for. maybe because its not "superior" to the ones i will restate benefit from surgeries and lifetime prescriptions. a "well side effects do happen" is enough to dismiss the people suffering from them? the good outweighs the bad isn't a solid argument when the bad is just as devastating to people who are already dealing with a affliction. so getting the type of information you want requires one to go into the deep recesses of right wing hatred and bigotry. at least that what is constantly said. here is a example. maybe you can find a few copies that havent been burned. be careful they cause "harm" but will provide some info on what your asking. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2021/07/16/irreversible-damage-anti-trans-booksellers-association/ another https://www.newsweek.com/best-selling-controversial-book-transgender-people-removed-amazon-3-years-after-publication-1571087 shall i go on? because the info is suppressed does not mean it does not exist. again similar to covid, defund the police, inflation effect, ending of fossil fuels. ect.ect. we can all wait until the negative effects and victims to pile up before the mood softens in the mainstream on platforming opposing viewpoints and medical professionals..remember Dr Robert Malone and how he was treated about his accurate warnings? eventually it will come out and the left will move to the next topic so we can be in a thread exactly like this one looking back in hindsight like all the rest. equating what gender you prefer having sex with and being a sports fan? really? again a reach. i simply told you my preference in people. if you enjoy being around people that are consumed with there sexual identity that's perfectly fine. its not for me and as i said it has nothing to do with what sex the person is attracted to. the fact you are also equating children being involved in the two examples as if its benign. that's a different story. ah the its all in your head. its not really happening. if thats so why all the hysteria on the "dont say straight bill" by desantis? seems as the knife cuts both ways with propaganda. the fact you think the left are the rational ones is the meat and potatoes of this thread. desantis bill is for K thru 4. you know what that bill is when all the media smoke is cleared right? the fact leftists are the ones saying women dont exist and yet, can't define them even at the highest positions in government. yeah this is a bit beyond "its not happening" id advise you look past your "non biased" outlets and go into a few "right wing hate sites" look at the many examples of the extremes on this issue they showcase. see if they look fake. just propaganda. i know you won't. but you should. otherwise how can you be so certain about what your even saying here. ill get you started on your dark path. go to youtube and put this name in. klara jeynes. learn how 4 year olds can be transgender when they barely have the concept of wiping their butts correctly. scroll around on the topic. there are plenty more. libs of tiktok showcases tons of people you dont think exist. using their OWN words in THIER videos. go to fox or daily wire and look for these innocent micky impersonation shows where children are puting money in drag womens bras and shaking there butts in kids faces. inviting the little ones on stage to collect money. wholesome family entertainment. then come back and let me know if its all so innocent. now i am no fool to think this behavior is the standard at these events. but they DO exist and noone is stopping it except for "homophobes". so still wondering why leftists are pushing drag shows with no regard to the fact most people do not want this regardless what goes on. if families just want to face these issues and have these talks alone. sure seems to be alot of public spectacles that draw attention to it to do it. no they want to prove how progressive they are publically and use there kids to prove it.

i dont need a medical expert to tell me someone who thinks they are something that goes against reality is experiencing a mental disorder. people who experience nothing but negative thoughts regardless of situation. people who see a obese person in the mirror despite their actual weight. its all the same situation and yet gender dysphoria is the only one in which people think society should confirm the psychosis as the part of the cure. every other situation i can think of it is harmful. this doesn't mean empathy and respect should not be given but also means those who wish to perpetuate it further and CELEBRATE a dysphoria are not helping the person suffering. yes i understand the suicide rates. i also read that "treatment" is not some great fix that reduces these rates. i dont think a person who is afflicted with this issue is "cured" and may only have a mountain of med debt to show for it sending them into deeper depression. or worse yet was put into this treatment and was only going through a phase that is now irreversable. I'm not saying this should not be a option but should be a LAST option. should be made when the person has a fully formed brain and NEVER be done outside the knowledge of those that know them best... taking away parental rights is insanity in EVERY situation where neglect or abuse was not in the history. i outlined alot of my thoughts above. i do not hate or love gay people. they are individuals who i base merit on like anyone i meet. i will say i do think it is odd when someone base their entire identity on their sexuality. where they MUST announce to the world who they prefer and yes this also goes for the straight "alpha" male types that wear shirts describing their affinity for boobs or constantly talk about how many women they get in bed ect ect. both are cringe. nobody really cares for the most part. we agree on kids being accepted and loved not sure that was ever in contention. its a problem the left created as now they want kids to be "exposed" to certain things and make choices on issues that many are to young to understand suddenly. i gave a good example with the right wing. its not a coincidence and its actually attracting alot of hatred unnecessarily simply due to the fact its a middle finger towards anyone who otherwise does not think about drag/trans/ or anything in the gay community. it almost as if leftists want the hatred as they continue on with something the .majority of americans do not want their kids exposed to just so they can have a victim group to defend. just because YOU see nothing wrong with it. far to often leftist think they know best for everyone else. leave kids out of the culture war crap period.

1. i agree this issue is being used as a lightning rod. its probably a good idea to not promote things like drag book reading during a time when alot is surrounding it. but that delicious virtue light is just so warming libs cant help themselves. 2. i have no doubt a ton of medical studies will be all for "helping kids transition". u appreciate you providing info for your argument but you have to know. its going to be real hard to filter this info because the same corporations who produce it are the ones who stand to make billions off the lifetime prescriptions and costly surguries. I'd think after the lies told about vax studies one would be very leary of this situation. i have a science degree and am embarrassed by what has been done to destroy its lagitimacy but its well earned. i will read your studies and correct any info i post if i see merit. 3 since we are taking a step back then I'd still like you to answer my question. is trans a mental disorder? i think its apparent. if it is then why in any capacity are leftists promoting it, especially to impressionable children. as i stated there are tons of mental disorders and very rarely do we demand everyone accept it and normalize it. your anorexic? well that's normal. everyone please tell this person they are a fat disgusting human so they feel comfortable about their binge purge cycles. as you roll your eyes please explain the difference as they both end up being very damaging if not recognized as a disorder and treated as such. i think you want to be logical but you automatically dismiss right wing talking points which is why you give off the impression trans therapy and meds do not come with MAJOR issues that are ireversable. pubity blockers can leave people sterile. horror stories of surgeries exist. how many tomboys did you know growing up. how many phases did you go in and out of. EVERYONE should be against children being introduced to this. drag book reads are not innocent. if the right was pushing bible studies in public schools and it just so happened men caring crosses with thorn crowns showed up at libraries for story time. i bet you wouldn't defend that as just a character like daffy duck. its not genuine.

so in a time when leftists are suggesting that children should be allowed to take take puberty blockers and authorize life altering surgeries, some even suggesting this can be done without parental consent. you think presenting them with men that dress as women as "fun" is in no way connected. come on now🙄 no i dont think they believe they are mickey mouse but we also dont live in a society where a large group of people are saying its ok to be mickey and if you choose...we have that surgical procedure and drugs available to make that happen.

so drag is a man dressing acting as a woman and you have no clue if the connection to trans?

do you think trans people have a mental disorder? im not saying its their fault or that their disorder effects me negatively but presenting that to children and basically celebrating it in society like we are currently doing is pretty dark. this is beyond the examples of drag dancers actually doing sexually explicit acts. if you haven't seen the videoes of drag people shaking their a$$ in front of children your just in the dark..doesnt mean it has not happened or is currently happening. so if being trans is a disorder what other mental health issues would you like to present and normalize to children. anorexia? phobias? why is this one so important to make children see and "understand". as for your peter pan example. its a good question. i think the answer is a woman most likely can portray the character accurately in real life. she does not truley believe she is peter pan. a production show may not have a male actor who can hit high notes and looks like a young child...which is what peter pan is. a for mickey and every other character you mention. those are all mythical characters.

no reason for that man. lets not devolve threads to this as a response.