Buffarukus

really? bernard was a absolute shock to me. i thought he would devolop into a hybrid cb/lb for nickle pass downs as a third taking out maybe poyer as dumb as that sounds as i write it. a disrupter, not a lynchpin. maybe a Kelsey killer to man up with more size. never saw him as a full time starter. hey if he develops into more then a wrench to toss into packages thats great but for some reason he seems like a absolute liability in any run and def not a full time lb in our nickle only. i cant believe we didnt reach to get the best one in the draft in the first. not that i want that at all but seeing as mcd had luke to cement his career and they seemed so intrigued with Edmunds becoming that guy with ridiculous traits. i will be suprised if they let mlb in a primary nickle not be a stud out the gate. meaning rd 2 maybe another trade up just to do it. again, not that i advocate that. we still need competition upgrades for the o line. esp right tackle.

ok i think thats why im hesitant. we seemed locked into 11 and never seemed to get creative and by the halfway point we stalled out and had to bring back beasley just because dorsey needed a specific slot guy and could not get creative with pretty talented roster. im still down on dorsey. we seemed really excited for gilliams athleticism. not on the field much. both our our rb pass catch ability. rare. knox upside enough to give a nice contract. spotty production. invisible in games. im a huge fan of shakir and dorsey issues getting him involved. dorsey seemed to just go 4 guys in very specific roles, besides digs in slot because hes a athletic freak. so the rich getting richer when you cant use what you got has me skeptical. that and this teams absolute refusal to play rookies in the first place. now we get one in a position we are not weak. it really makes me nervous. i hope it works out the way you say instead of how it has actually been but thanks for the insight. i really think we should trade knox as much as that pains me. i just dont think his production will be worth the hefty contract now. hope im wrong but thanks for the info and optimism. i need it lol

wow good job. im warming up to it after watching film. this is def BPA. does this put knox on the bench more or is kincaid our #3 full time slot? im not mad at the pick if i had more confidence in dorsey. im not a fan of how he uses weopons and kincaid/knox combo i feel one is going to end up contributing nothing. if its knox that's alot of cap in the trash. dorsey just seems like he needs a vanilla offense with really good players at concrete positions. not alot of interesting shifts of roles happening in which i think both guys can eat.

i like this very much.

no. we look at evidence. tucker presented some. some that was hidden from you, me, and defense team...which is illegal. you refuse to ask simple questions based on it. you then go on to say it was bs or whatever when it lead to his freedom and dont blink a eye. if trump was in office. they arrested a redtail hawk for violence. cnn showed clips of you standing around. i said cnn is propaganda. i dont believe my lying eyes. let him rot. pretty sure you would feel diff for my unrelenting bias that doesn't even consider anything but my politics for conviction of the strongest degree. thats a disturbing place but i see by your downvote of that idea. your pretty far gone. have a good night and hope that situation is just a example.

im not. im saying being si biased you are perfectly fine prosecuting your "enemies" and dismissing any evidence to the contrary has a natural conclusion to violence. people arent going to peacefully stand around and get rounded up because you were TOLD they deserve it.

i sure would! dont bring me down to your level. im on this board saying many things your biased mind would think impossible. not a trump fan. abortion rights. advocation to clear student debt. some of us a open to both sides of the story. especially if it means unjustly prosecuting people. within the rules of what? certainly not law or objectivity. you pluck out the last statement. because you have nothing to say on the rest? its not a surprise.

meaningless? that footage got the shaman his freedom? i guess the sentencing judge didn't see it as dubious as you. its not suprising that there are people in this country that dismiss evidence that ultimately frees a man as what you just suggested. its really sad. there are alot of people whos political bias is so deep they would rather have people rot in jail and maintain that bias then objectively say...maybe the narrative was wrong. many people were violent. i did not see footage of them on tucker. the man who picked up the trashed statues in the footage, if full footage start to finish was him being let in and peacefully cleaning up but he was charged with 20+ years terrorist action. would you be behind that persecution. why? that is civil war territory friend. prosecuting political enemies and then dismissing evidence because its from someone you don't like. its flat out evil. for a group of people that ultimately came out of covid looking like fools i find it astonishing any of you can act objective or think you are on the right side of history to call any info misinformation and not care if fellow citizens are being unjustly prosecuted as you don't even consider evidence to the contrary. id feel the same for antifa or blm who were being prosecuted unjustly dept on evidence uncovered. but that's just me i guess.

so congress passes a full budget and the borrowing part is what they are "raising" after both sides have already agreed to the number beforehand or can the side holding out reduce the debt side. they certainly make it sound that they are actually doing more then shutting down the government over nothing. i know congress held out because they did not want any money allocated to the wall and ultimately that's what they got. no wall

why does the left want to abolish everything? you abolished having to shower and leave the house a few years. you abolished having to find a bathroom to take a $h/+ in your cities. you abolished anyone slowing you down when you take stuff from all the stores. lets mellow out on the abolishing for a bit. no, i hear what your saying. isnt this litterally the only time where our politicians have to even think about money spent or deficits? i agree its pointless but still nice that they have to pretend they give a F with a tiny bit of urgency on the line. lord knows they want to be dead before any real reprocussions truly hit. not getting mail for a few days and suddenly everyone has a meltdown. i like the shock to the system while they pretend to compromise.

"trying to protect elon" that's it? a fragment of a statement diced off excluding context or subject? what was it? why did he say that?

if the class is drag queen bible reading. is the destruction of a normal education for kids to everyone's satisfaction?

it really is pointless. theres not going to be a great awakening of the woke. dont address it directly and it doesnt exist. force them to look and blame someone/thing else. nigerians are "black". are in a worse position economically comming in the country including language barrier. very successful with same skin tone. how many other identity groups are successful and nonviolent but not "white". alot. problems cannot be addressed when they are given a baked in excuse to exist and ignored.

are you using TOTAL population numbers? im not sure what this is saying motor. its a given white people are going to be more violent...towards everyone including whites when they are a majority. is there a place on the planet this is not true? if we drill in deeper and are looking at men. the most likely cause of violence. we are talking less then 7%. 3.5 less likely becomes quite a bit different. all sorts of interesting ways to manipulate data but goose is right. its all meaningless unless given citation to analyze to see what people are doing with the data.

my question is how/why so many older people are caught up in it all. luckily my gen was at the tail end of smartphone emergence. when staring at a computer screen all day made you a outcast/nerd. now its odd not to. for the gen that know segragation/racism/freedom very well. they certainly don't seem to be aware enough that they are pushing society back into it all under new names. i guess age and wisdom dont nec coincide as much as conformity. those people that should know better are who are letting us down...they are all in charge.

i really think we are living in the matrix. society today is what happens when generations grows up with their face in a screen every minute of the day. a morphed worldview that focused on whatever induces a big reaction/on time/ad revenue. entire worldviews built on extremes. algorythms building everything you can't personally see and humans happy to be isolated with the bots who can create consensus. 10s of millions. how could so many be wrong. censorship so you never even know any other reality. imagine the National Enquirer being the nightly news your whole life and noone ever telling you its nothing but hyporbolic garbage. a huge digital community to back up this normal reality. i think that's why many can't be reasoned with. someone is trying to tell you the sky is red but you have seen the sky 100s of times in your phone. millions of heart emojis confirm it is blue. im not even going to bother to look up and anyone who suggests it should be flagged for misinformation. i think that's the reality of ALOT of people. would you want to listen to this red sky liar? we will see where this goes but its not looking good for western society. thats my random thought.

its 2023 hope is all thats required now.

ouch. i didnt know you read my thoughts so often that you can critique my EVERY post. obviously i have to do better for my fan. ill make alot of typos like you but capitalize. try your best to read my shlog. if you can. You can't answer the question. I can literally name every presidential policy in human history and it will effect people at some point. good or bad. large or small segments. You choose a trade war as your reasoning as worst ever. while it did have a effect, its pretty weak. Obviously tariffs on China boosting the cost for products of their slave labor made your trips to Walmart seethe in rage. Sorry i did not notice a significant price jump. If i did I thought decades of imbalance in US trade policy with China was worth trying to adjust. Seeing as we are massive consumers and China picks and chooses what american products they decide to allow in their country. some of those allowed face big tariffs just to be in that market. Thats before they steal our intellectual property, manufacture under slave wages and sell back to Mr Professor at a discount. Good for Ron but not so much for american manufacturing. any price increase may have led to consumers choosing american made products that are at a competitive price. obviously a horrific mistake to try. Biden saw a similar problem. We made too much domestic oil. We need to stop doing that and immediately shift to a energy we have no infrastructure or rare earth minerals for. We also need to cower in fear and fire people for vaccines that do not work well. For years mind you. Me and my fellow citizens felt that immediately and hard. making new life decisions on food or gas every week is a bit different in my world. there are no alternatives. I am paid a decent wage but i know alot of people this is devastating to. no big deal to a tenured english teacher like yourself. Its a difference of opinion i guess. You see global warming as a worthy cause. I see a opposing a growing nuclear powered adversary trade disadvantage as one. You couldn't buy cheap chinese products..as cheap. everyone on fixed income had to skip meals to get to work. you paid more for chinese products. We all pay more for every product. including chinese. you realize that right? Gas doubling in a weeks time. people losing their jobs in a day. direct negative "reprocushunz" to me, and you. if you look close you might say one is much worse. Bidens campaign promise was to end fossil fuels. executive orders on drilling domestically. Its only partially his fault? selling our reserve off. We were independent. sure. whatever you need to tell yourself with those facts in mind. typos, missing indents on paragraphs aside i hope you can comprehend how stupid this comparison is. you may never live in a country that had the prices with the "worst president" presiding again. Am i still unclear on the difference or should i switch to my 3rd language?

well didnt he set prices on prescriptions like insulin near the end of his term. i believe i read biden reversed those agreements and then reworked them to take credit. id have to research that but i remember thinking is this just some reelection smoke and mirrors from trump because somthing that sounded really good was not covered..then the middle east peace agreements. i was like this is a big deal and the media is acting like its just some false campaign junk. but thats the media..and prob why "trump was the worst ever" keeps getting posted. im not sure how those agreements turned out in the long run. ill have to look into it. edit: judge blocked a executive order. good ol american judges. move like the wind on cheap drug prices. have to read the constitution 1000 times letter by letter for years to rule on executive orders to fire people without vax and boosters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-drug-pricing/federal-judge-blocks-trump-administration-drug-pricing-rule-idUSKBN28X2II why i thought biden reversed it..no he just froze it...to be reviewed?? cant have that hit the market. might change this "worst president" i been hearing about. 🙄 https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/01/politics/biden-trump-drug-prices/index.html

i agree 100%. i pose the question to see if their is any honesty. if they felt no personal reprocussions then how can they say "worst ever"? the president today has definitely impacted their daily lives in negative ways but they will push it on excuses provided and keep pounding the drum that was drilled every day for four years. even though they have a clear reference now between being TOLD about a bad pres and being EFFECTED by a bad pres. bush was def worse then trump. not sure how a argument can be made. on top of the lives and trillions in debt for war that was based on lies there was the wallstreet blank check bailout. sure clinton put in the policy but bush sat and watched that bubble grow while economist warned it was just a matter of time. its pretty interesting thinking about the media during that time and how tame it was for a idiot whos warhawking vp ran the country. who knew the occupy wallstreet crowd would become the corporatist endless war crowd complete with admiration for a Cheney.

no you shouldnt go on. like i said i tryed this with you and this is what you give. your listing things that trump didnt fix? biden passes a infrastructure deal that cost trillions of dollars and thats a trump policy that negatively effected you personally? a rotted infrastructure that was allowed to happen over decades..the entire time biden had power to address it as a career politician AND vp. this is a trump policy that negatively effected you? same goes with "trump care"? read above. so policies he never made is your example? what the hell are you talking about? he did work on bills to lower prescription prices. you act like his campaign promises have anything to due with a democrat loyalist. biden said he was going to bring the country together. the policy he never made is negativly effecting me cause you are still a billstime biden lover! im holding biden responsible for this broken campaign promise of a reply you gave lol now this is great. billstime was in full support of the wall!? i had you all wrong. his corporate tax cuts negatively effected "us?" you sure? my company reinvested it to buy me a new stapler. its red. sorry you work for greedy pigs who bought back stocks. lol. your generalizing and really have no clue how you were effected by that. debt piling is something you personally applaud. i said negative effect personally. again trade war with china? that negativley effected you? this!? this is what our board member who has a trump is the worst president doctorate degree has to say when it comes to policy that effected him? policy he never made and hyporbolics on broad complex topics that never significantly touched you in any reasonable way? ill give you a example. bidens has cost me personally and direct members of my family thousands of dollars due to his anti oil climate policy. executive order aka biden directly did this. bidens federal vaccination policy has been addopted by ny state. thousands of qualified healthcare workers have been fired. my grandfather has stage 4 Alzheimer's. he used to get a nurse provided to his home by ny state 5 days a week. that has been cut to 3 due to lack of employees. me and my family rotate to cover this. it has negativley effected me. executive order aka biden directly did this. THOSE are direct reprocussions of a failed presidents policies. my side street still looks like $#[÷. thats getting fixed in 2 weeks you said? 😉 should i go on? ill give credit. you tried. most dont answer because they understand the question

i already tryed this with you mr. time. but yes. this is the typical answer, when its attempted. so kuschner secretly stole campaign money. ill take this as absolute truth. that is not a trump policy that negatively effected you personally. so much for over and over. still waiting on the first. for the description provided as satan on earth..especially by a guy infatuated like yourself. you have already not answered what should be the easiest question asked on the planet. i should get a list immediately.

all accounts? ALL? wow given the state of our country and this being said by every leftist known to man. i still haven't seen one back it with actual policy that negatively effected them personally. its all boils down to leftists wiping a singular shimmering tear from their eye as they describe a off putting personality trait. can you do it ron? are you the chosen one? dont worry i fully expect this to get ignored but i have posed this question to every leftist board members on here so hoping you are the one that can offer insight on what trump actually did to people while in office and not what he said.

if crt is such a important topic then why not teach it in a afternoon school program. im guessing no one would show up. if this gender identity crap was just legitimate subject with nothing strange going on. you'd have parental opt in sheets. if you weren't afraid of your lesson plans you'd have syllabus printed in the beginning of the year. they know this doesnt belong in schools. they know parents would rather their kids learn ordinary subjects or none of this would be not be forced on classes during regular times and so secretive. its very easy to see by the actions that leftists are running cover with constant excuses of why all this is necessary to do. none of it is.

exactly. the left keeps talking about "fringe". i dont approve its just the loud minority. no if the top levels of washington are advocating and sicking military type operations on parents. id say that is no longer "fringe". people arent going to just take it. when we are talking about peoples families and children i am very suprised that we arent seeing more violent types of reactions. i certainly hope not. but keep poking with a stick. keep pushing people into corners on issues with family and your playing with very serious fire. there are only so many ways to warn someone. LEAVE PEOPLES CHILDREN OUT OF THIS WOKE POLITICAL CULTURE WAR CRAP. PERIOD. be as enclusive and woke as you want but please stop pushing that s#it on everyone else especially their kids. its either going to result in laws you dont like getting made that noone really wants but is necessary. if that doesnt work and they still do it people are going to say f it i tried the resposable thing..now im going to take it in my own hands. you keep declaring the country is brimming with "far right terrorists" and we are talking about people with no political affiliation that are forced into taking a side because people can't just admit their side has gone to far.