transplantbillsfan

Fine, I'm not arguing semantics with this. You used an incorrect verb then because Taylor doesn't suck. So I was wrong. No hyperbole. I should have just said you were completely wrong in saying Taylor sucks, because you were. Mahalo for the correction

Huh? When did I ever say I would ignore you? You're thinking of the advice that you constantly give that you don't follow yourself with Jm. I'm an adult. I can carry on conversations with people I disagree with. Was this post your way of ignoring addressing the hypocrisy I brought up?

Oh what a buncha horse manure. I absolutely loathe this type of logic when it's coming from someone who rejects similar logic that just doesn't fit his narrative. Shady, what you're bring up here are situational circumstances that favored Taylor in these two games as proof that what Taylor did was purely luck on some level and insinuating that Taylor needs a ton of luck to accomplish this. Yet, time and time and time again you dismiss the situational circumstances that worked in opposition to Taylor in terms of bringing his team back. Like the Miami game to end last year that your pal you claim to ignore but don't constantly brings up. Or the Seattle game last year with the ref screwing us on the FG to end the half or screwing us out of a PI to end the game. Or the refs screwing up an obvious 1st down catch by Hogan in the KC game last year that Rex further screwed up by not challenging the call. Or Zay Jones not being able to catch the damn football. Or 2 TDs that would have at least tied the game against the Giants last year called back on at least questionable, if not phantom penalties. Or... Yet, those situational circumstances are taboo to discuss. But the ones that allowed Taylor to mount those 2 comebacks or GWDs must be scrutinized. Spectacular hypocrisy.

"Suck" is an adjective. You said Taylor sucks. That's hyperbole. He doesn't suck, unless you just think any QB who hasn't proven himself to be an Elite or Franchise QB "sucks." Yeah, this sounds about right. Dennison's playcalling is largely responsible for that.

So much hyperbole. Taylor will be a starter in the NFL next year unless the rest of his year resembles the Carolina and Cincinnati games, which is highly unlikely.

Huh? During what contract time? Taylor has never not been under contract with Buffalo since the offseason leading up to 2015. Is that what you're talking about? If so, no surprise considering he hadn't started a game at that point. Otherwise, Tyrod Taylor has been under contract since then and inquiries from other teams directed at him and his agent would have been considered tampering. That's a fact, Jack

Dude, I can't believe this. Your mischievous backhanded compliments of Taylor aren't hiding what's transformed from an agenda to a bannable crusade.

Where is the article? Link? If that's true, that's just pathetic! Also, if what you posted is a direct quote from McDermott, then it sounds like he really likes Taylor.

3rd round or possibly 2nd round pick would be expected. Starting NFL QB would absolutely garner that much. The 1st says more.

If Green Bay offers a first round pick for Taylor, say yes and hang up the phone quickly so they don't change their mind. Never going to happen, though.

Relocation alone.

Looks like he'll be back. That would really help. I really hope this doesn't mean that McDermott decides to make one of the WRs inactive.

Is this a joke? That's like exactly what he said. I don't know how anyone can criticize anything that he said here. But as someone else said, show me the baby.

Fantastic post!

God what's wrong with you guys? Try having a little goddamn fun. Do your lives require you to be so miserable towards people all the time? In or out on this friendly bet?

Okey dokey. Took you off

When was Thompson with us again? This past preseason or last year? Does he already know our offense?

That sounds like you expect a good game outta Taylor, then I take this to mean you're in... ?

Any more takers? I mean, Fitz might be starting. This could become a shootout

No we don't. We need to get into the playoffs to be a playoff team. If we go 2-1 in our next 3 games, we're still in pretty good shape. There's no team left on our schedule that isn't beatable, including the Patriots and Chiefs. But if we win our next 3 in a row, my thoughts will shift from merely playoffs to something better

Can you identify all of Taylor's bad games, please? You, much like Gugny are head-scratchingly asserting that the majority of Taylor's games are bad games. Gugny went so far as to say 30 of Taylor's 34 games are bad. So, name them so we can talk it out. Or is this another one of your weird "figures of speech" things like when you claimed something about 3rd down % by throwing out an actual number that was way off base? You claim that there are only 30 out of Taylor's remaining 32 games leftover were bad games after you've eliminated the good games against the Seahawks and Dolphins. So the following you would consider bad games? 2015 ​Indy Win @Mia Win @Ten Win Mia Win Hou Win Dal Win NYJ Win 2016 ​@NE Win @LA Win SF Win Jax Win Cle Win 2017 ​NYJ Win Den Win @Atl Win So you're arguing that 13 of those 15 games are bad games. In order to figure out those 13, why don't you tell us all which of those 15 are his 2 good games?

This is the problem with looking ahead at a schedule and calling it easy or hard or impossible based on the teams you play. As oldmanfan said, I just hope McDermott is true to his weekly focus on these new opponents. Every game in the NFL is winnable. It's that simple. So anyone circling 3 automatic losses for when we play the Chiefs and Patriots twice is just misguided. Honestly, I think most people here like to circle losses in order to keep expectations super low and be pleasantly surprised when the team exceeds expectations, and if you keep expectations super low, your expectations are almost always exceeded.

Then it was a really bad point.

Gugny. C'mon man. You can't be serious with this, can you? So Taylor has been bad in 30 out of the 34 starts he's had in Buffalo? That's actually what you think? This doesn't even warrant any effort into trying to prove you wrong because it's just stupid. And I really hope I'm misreading what you said.

Sounds good