JaCrispy

Don’t hate the playa, hate the game. 😉

I don’t know about that…Non whites seem to be doing an awful lot of killing in urban communities, and no one seems to care about that… Not sure your argument is strong on this topic…👍

Fair point…But that’s not like anything Lindsey is doing…He’s doing legit research, and putting up material for free…

Lol…unfortunately I will never know what white privilege feels like… But, careful, your racism is starting to show…😉

Episode 2… Yin and Yang represent the eternal struggle between chaos (feminine) and order (masculine) in the universe… Peterson claims that those that identify with the political Right, exhibit character traits that align with the side of “order”…They typically have masculine character traits associated with discipline, logic, rationality…This is also why more males relate to things and are in the STEM fields, or mechanics… He then claims that those that identify with the political Left, exhibit character traits with the side of “chaos” (but not in a negative sense)…They typically have feminine character traits associated with emotion, and empathy…This is why more females relate to people, and are in professions relating to people (ie nursing or teaching)… The Left is good at empathizing with the down trodden, because they are more in touch with their emotions…They are good at identifying problems affecting people in society, where the Right typically is not. However, the Right is better at solving those problems. Their lack of emotion allows them to come up with logical solutions. This is also why you tend to see more emotional outbursts from from people on the Left, although it may also occur on the Right. It is just not the main strategy on the Right like it is the Left. The bottom line, according to Peterson, is that you don’t want to be on either side of the Yin (Right, masculine) or Yang (Left, feminine). Being firmly on either side leads to authoritarianism either by the masculine or feminine. Where you want to be, Peterson claims, is riding the line between chaos and order. It is only there where true harmony and peace lives. Essentially, you want to have the chaos of the Left, so that society isn’t stagnant, and you are always progressing. But you also want the order of the Right so that society can function together, without unbridled change driving you off a cliff. So, in conclusion, we all just need to realize the arguments and struggles we have in here are all part of a greater universal struggle. And if we recognize that, it might help the world to come together. Thanks for taking the time to read the long essay…I would love to hear any additional thoughts…👍

What’s your definition of a grifter?

He’s put in way to much work to dismiss him as a grifter… Ive posted some of his talks here…He’s calls himself a moderate, who never considered himself to be conservative, but just a person who opposed the new woke religion that had sprouted in the last decade- a really intellectual thinker and extremely thought provoking…

Episode 1… I just wanted to bring up this topic because, it’s a little different than the every day back and forth, and it’s always just really fascinated me… I’ve been a big fan of Jordan Peterson for quite some time now. I’ve read some of his books, I’ve watched countless interviews, and I’ve even seen him live. Peterson has a real gift of being able to say things in such a way that really makes you think differently (than you ever have before) about the various topics he’s discussing. One of the topics Peterson discussed that I found fascinating was when he talked about how, based on the science of psychology, you could essentially determine what political persuasion an individual was simply based on their temperament. An individuals temperament, Peterson claimed, was based on masculine and feminine character traits that had been determined by the science of psychology. An example of a masculine character trait would be assertiveness. An example of a feminine character trait would be passiveness. Now this didn’t mean that all males were completely assertive or that all females were completely passive. But what these character trait categorizations did was to give a broad overview of what each sex generally displayed. As you go down the list of character traits you’ll realize that for each masculine trait, there is an opposite feminine trait, almost mimicking the never ending battle of the yin and yang of the universe… …to be continued…

Whatever man…just trying to give you some personal anecdotes…I don’t really care if you believe it or not…you’re gonna do you, regardless… I’ve read other people, but not Chris Ruffo, although I’m assuming he’s a conservative thinker based on your reaction to him… Could it be that Mr. Rufo began talking about these things because Leftists were not afraid to start introducing these Marxist concepts to the public? Perhaps…seems logical…People start writing ideological books, and others will analyze the theories, and their origins…Does that seem like a rational thing to do? But yes, I’ve heard of him many times, have not seen or read any of his stuff…I do appreciate a guy named James Lindsey though…his work is very good if you wanna check him out… Marxism is complex…there’s a lot to unpack…But once you start understanding the goals, strategies, and tactics, you start to realize it’s a lot more pervasive than once thought…

Which means nothing, because congress doesn’t have the authority to enforce the contempt charge..

Funny you say that because the word is that Biden won’t do a debate hosted by FOX News…😉 I think a liberal network and a conservative network should host one, just to be fair…👍

Well that doesn’t necessarily seem to have anything to do with Chris Rufo, specifically…And if it does, I’m having a hard time seeing the connection… The first time I ever heard about DEI was from Democrats…I used to be a mainstream media junkie back in the day, and I noticed how when ever they would give interviews, they seemed to always use this phrase “diversity, equity, and inclusion”…And they would all keep saying it over and over… And I thought 2 things initially…First, I thought, it seems like it is being scripted for them all to say… But the second thing that really caught my attention was the word “equity”…At first I wondered whether the Democrats were confused, and really meant to use the word “equality”- because even though they are close in sound, the two words mean the complete opposite… And I was shocked, because I thought ‘surely the Democrats don’t KNOW that this is Marxist terminology”….They wouldn’t do that if they knew, would they? But I was wrong…The Democrats DID know…And they purposely use this Marxist terminology to show their allegiance to anti American hate groups like BLM, Antifa, etc… And I was blown away…For me, that was when the Democrat Party “ Crossed the Rubicon”…They had gone too far, where I could no longer entertain what they were pushing… The thing that sux is that I’m kinda politically homeless because I can’t stand the Republicans either…I’ll smoke what they are offering, but I have to hold my nose every time I do…But, honestly, the only thing that allows me to give them more benefit of the doubt, as much as they suck- is that they aren’t bat crap crazy, pushing Marxist ideology coded as DEI…

Not true about Chris Rufo…I didn’t start hearing Democrats use the term DEI, until about 10-15 years ago… People always have and will always will take issue with people given preferential treatment, where anything but their qualifications are the determining factor… Whether race, sex,, gender identity…This even goes for nepotism… America is about equal opportunity, not equality of outcome- which is what DEI is… Now, obviously, companies have the right to hire whoever they want…But they shouldn’t be punished for not hiring who someone else thinks they should have hired…And if they choose to hire a less qualified candidate, then it will reveal itself in the companies results- much like if the Bills don’t draft the best talent, hire the right coaches, they will not be successful… The universe always has a way of correcting itself…it doesn’t need government to try to play God with everything…lol 👍

I’ll answer in order… You could say that Affirmative Action was DEI in its infancy…One could argue that, initially, Affirmative Action may have been needed…But it was never understood to be a permanent solution- but rather transitional tool to bridge the Jim Crow days to modern times. It has been 60 years, and 3 generations since then…And up until DEI was introduced 15 years ago, race relations seemed to be progressing nicely…Suddenly DEI is introduced, and segregation is being promoted in school and in the workplace, and I feel like we over corrected, and are now regressing again- as race relations are the worst they’ve been in 50 years…The only difference is it is coming from different place than it previously had… My family is so racist, and they are black…

Don’t forget the admissions lawsuit filed by Asian students, a few years back, claiming precisely this… DEI claims inclusion, but it is closer to discrimination in many ways, which is against the Civil Rights Act…👍 You claimed it was a hoax…I wanted you to see for yourself what your own people are saying… Looks like they agree with me…😉 I am answering your questions- you just don’t like the answer…

This is DEI rhetoric…👍

In a nutshell, DEI refers to anything but straight, white, Christian male, will get preferential treatment, even if they not as qualified…And it means Asians will have to work twice as hard…👍

Yes it is, because over the course of time, it eventually collapses the economy of a society when businesses do not hire the best people for the job… This stuff has already been attempted in communist countries, and failed… We have always been a merit based society- that is what has caused us to excel- finding the best of the best…America is only asking for trouble down the road, using DEI because it does not care if you are qualified or not…

I work for a global corporation like yourself… What you mentioned about vets bringing skills to your company is not really considered DEI… Clearly those people offer things your company needs… At my job we do a lot of labor intensive work…It’s not really something that a female would be efficient at because it requires a lot of strength… However, because of DEI, our company started hiring females, anyway…And naturally, production began to decrease…Within months the females realized they couldn’t do the job and left for other things… Everyone knew this was going to happen, but DEI caused the company to lose money just to hire people we knew would not be able to do the job… Thats DEI, and it is why companies who implement it will not be as efficient as they could be…

And those who majored in lesbian dance theory and aren’t qualified for the position…😉

Such as…

You see, you’re so wrapped up in the emotional symbolism of a “red hat” instead of debating the actual merits and downsides of DEI…always superficial ad hominem with you- no substance…

It doesn’t have anything to do with my sleep…just a little friendly advice so you can understand how you’ve been indoctrinated, and don’t even realize it…

DEI in action…👎

You perceive from a false assumption- that all of your views are virtuous, and anyone that disagrees with you is, by default, “hateful”… Words of wisdom- just because you disagree does not make someone else’s point “hate”… That is simply a Marxist tactic to try to guilt someone, in an attempt to shut down discussion, to avoid talking about the substance of the point being put forward… And it is the ultimate un American move…so congrats, once again, on outing yourself…😉