-
Posts
11,582 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by JaCrispy
-
Not necessarily the Party- more so the intelligence community/MIC that has captured the MSM, and who dominate the Democrat and Republican Parties… Tucker often spoke out against these groups, exposing a lot of corruption…He was the biggest news show in the country, and had many threats on his life for the work he did…People in positions of power definitely wanted him gone… I will definitely be interested wherever he goes…
-
Well the Dems demanded he be taken off the air- looks like the pressure might have been too much for FOX to withstand…
-
What will you do tonight at 8p?
JaCrispy replied to SectionC3's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Tucker was too good for FOX imo…He will have his pick of a landing spot…But don’t be surprised if Daily Wire or The Blaze try to scoop him up…👍 -
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Boy, this didn’t age well…Btw, he reminds me of the Joker without makeup- very creepy…😉 -
If the Chiefs trade up ahead of us, for the second straight year, to take Zay Flowers, I’m gonna be pissed…
-
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I appreciate your honest response… But I guess what I am getting at is “Anti-vax” has become such a vague term to include people who simply don’t feel they need to take the vaccine because they are young and healthy, to people who don’t believe it should be mandated- especially when it has been proven to not prevent the spread or contraction… This was never the original definition of Anti-Vaxx until they changed it (during Covid) to include more people…But I don’t view the new definition as “anti-vax” because it just seems like common sense to me, and people should have the right to ask logical questions about something without being labeled “anti-anything”…Plus, it is much different than people who will actually refuse a vaccine under any circumstance…That’s anti-vaxx to me… So, my question basically is, is there anything, specifically, RFK has said that is anti-vaxx to you? Thanks…👍 -
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Is this code for “you don’t have an answer” 😉 -
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Why do you call him an anti-vaxxer? What makes him a “nut” on the issue? Just curious… -
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Perhaps he believes in a different world view than the Establishment Democrats and Republicans…But the term “Far Right Conspiracy Theory” is inaccurate Imo, as there are just as many people on the Left who think the same thing… It’s just that the Establishment (Intelligence community) labels them “Far Right” to divide the country and maintain power…👍 -
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Yes, your psychosis of Trump… Nice- every CIA-created name in the book…how convenient…😉 Btw, didn’t you know that having skeletons in your closet means nothing when running for president anymore? I think Clinton, Hillary, Trump and Biden have proven that… -
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
So, now, anyone who disagrees with the Establishment (Democrat) narrative is Q-Anon? Good to know we have some real thinkers in here…😉👍 -
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy replied to JaCrispy's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Pure genius how you managed to turn a thread about RFK Jr’s presidential bid into a post about Trump… Your psychosis knows no bounds…😉 -
So glad you asked… Imo, as long as the Bills keep “piecemeal-ing” the putting together of this team (like patchwork), I fear its potential will never fully be realized… My preference would be for the team to view this draft like a mini-rebuild…Pretend you’re in year 1 or 2 and you’ve got holes all over the place…That mindset should help you to, pretty much, take the best player at just about any position, and not reach just to fill one or two positions…Reaching on picks will only continue to hold this team back from being able to compete with KC and Cincy…
-
Don’t feel bad, man…I’ve never been as unenthusiastic for a draft as I am this year.. Part of it has to do with the lack of talent… Part of it has to do with fearing Beane will reach for need like he always does- missing out on better talent… Part of it has to do with feeling the Bills are a stagnant team- causing them to fall further behind other teams…
-
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for president in 2024?
JaCrispy posted a topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
The heir to the original Democrat dynasty is now coming out in opposition to what the Party has morphed into since his uncle and father were murdered… thoughts? I know I’m certainly intrigued…👍 -
No team suffers from “bad timing” worse than the Buffalo Bills… And Beane has never been good at planning ahead…he always seems to be one year behind when drafting- likely why he always seems to be forced into drafting for need instead of BPA…
-
First off, thank you so much for such an awesome post…It is rare around here that you actually get to engage in thoughtful dialogue…So thank you…👍 As far as your first point about the slow speed of communication being a partial catalyst for the push for local government over centralized control- I suppose it’s possible, but from my understanding, there were three other reasons I think were likely the cause… The first being we had just fought a war for freedom with a country that had a centralized government…And it was extremely oppressive…So, a great motivation for our new government was to do the opposite of that… Second, each state had its own culture, it’s own values, and its own industry…It probably just made sense to let the governments closest to the people be able to institute policy that best suited localized situations… Third, the country was in its infancy and had no money, no national currency, and no national military…The federal government basically had no power to do anything…All power resided with the states… As for the Founders, you are absolutely correct about them having great disagreements, and even arguments, about the details of the Constitution (like the electoral college, for example)…Therefore, I guess when I refer to the Founders, I’m more referring to what they eventually compromised on- our founding documents… But even though it may have been a period of great partisanship, the one thing they seemed to agree on was not allowing the government to impede people’s freedoms…In fact there was a great saying from one of them (I don’t remember who), but to paraphrase- they didn’t even want to create a government except for the reason of ensuring that people’s rights were protected…👍 I’m not a historian, but I hope this, at least, helped to answer some of your questions…👍
-
No, not at all…and that’s an excellent answer…thank you for helping out your friend with a coherent response… And I agree, I’d rather there not be any of those groups as well…They are all extremist groups imo…👍 The problem is they are all battling each other and we are caught in the middle, forced to choose a side or be “excommunicated”… Then you get into the situation where there are so many different cultures here, that have so many different standards of living…That’s why the Founders wanted local governments, not centralized authority, to determine the will of the people…👍