BullBuchanan

The bucs have struggled to find a consistent back since the earliest of Doug martin's career. Shady could do well there if he isn't used up.

A conference-only schedule might result in the best year of SEC ball ever. Alabama won't be able to get away with playing no one until the championship.

Yup. But also just because Marx believed socialism was a transformative state to communism doesn't mean that it must be so. In addition, economies are not required to exist in a pure ideology. There are many countries, namely African nations that embrace capitalism far more than we do in America. The concept of strong trade unions is also a central socialist principle. You can be politically socialist and advocate for workers owning more share of the means of production without the abolition of private enterprise or a free market. There are no absolutes and everything exists on a scale. Asking folks to have nuanced conversations can sometimes be a tall order today. Incorrect. "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement" "Requirement" is the operative word. It's not my opinion - it's how sentences and words work.

Also, you didn't answer my question about socialism. Do you not believe that you can be a socialist and have a nuclear family? I don't think you understand what socialism is, and just use it as a slur. Yes I do.

Read it again, you didn't understand it. It's explicitly stated that nuclear families are not a requirement. They are one of many valid options. You follow turning point? That makes so much sense. They have trouble with reading too. That's why they use pictures.

There's data that suggest people whose grandparents live with them are more likely to be poor, abuse drugs and alcohol etc.? What about those raised by two sets of parents?

False.

Several people above who claimed that the only family was a nuclear family.

Unless they were raised by their grandparents or a set of divorced parents though, right?

Are there not "whackos" in nuclear families? Are there not abusers and child molesters?

Given your inability to understand even one sentence of a relatively straightforward quote, forgive me if I take your diagnosis with a bit of skepticism.

No, they don't. If you read the entire page the rest of their messaging is very similar regarding gender/sex etc. Genrally speaking the mesage it, no matter what your upbringing, your orientation, your gender, your family structure, you are welcome. You know, kinda like that jesus dude.

No it doesn't, people just take words off the sentence which creates something they didn't say. They are eliminating the REQUIREMENT for it to be a family. Kind of like how civil rights movement didn't eliminate white people, they eliminated the requirement for you to be white to participate.

is it because people use it as a slur to hurt people different than them?

Your statement tells me that you have trouble reading. Read the quote back and try to figure out how the subject and qualifier advocate for the position you're defending. What part of the nuclear family do you attribute to workers owning the means of production? I mean, for the most part so do I and I'm an upper middle class straight white dude. They aren't exclusively beliefs held by black people for black people, though they have extremely valid additional reasons for wanting those things beyond my reasons.

Except when they aren't? Are you saying a single mother cannot be a family? Are you saying a child raised by their grandparents are not a family? I just want to be clear. What about grandparents that live with the their children and grandchildren? Are they not a family because they are multi-generational?

No, you just miscomprehended the statement. It's quite clear. "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable." What that part means, is that they believe you don't have to fit one definition of a family to be a family. They are much more family-friendly than those that only support one type.

Yes.

Then why would you promote anti-family stances?

That's false.

You made it clear that it's actually you with the anti-social goals since you believe certain groups of people don't qualify as "family". How does denying their idea of a family make yours stronger?

Is this rhetorical?

The difference between Denmark(85.2) and the USA(70.4) is roughly the same as the USA and Thailand(55.4). In other words, The USA is Denmark's Thailand.

You can be from the 54th country on the list and 27 is still an improvement. Why people immigrate and where from is a whole separate discussion.

What about the page tells you that it's left wing? Did you read that the data is a visualization of the annual report from the World Economic Forum? Are you suggesting their data is incorrect and intentionally politically biased? If so, do you have data to support your claims? Do you have data to support an improved social mobility score for the USA?