BullBuchanan

So, scaled for population ~41.4 black people were killed per 19 white people assuming your numbers are true. Yes it is.

When that opinion is that the lives of people that look different than you are worth less, than absolutely yes it's better to destroy cities. We've done it for a hell if a lot less.

At a certain point, I'd think the whole team would get shut down like what's happening in MLB

Story checks out: Christian Tybring-Gjedde (born 8 August 1963) is a Norwegian politician who represents the Progress Party. He has been a member of the Norwegian parliament since 2005, and was the leader of the Progress Party's Oslo chapter from 2010 to 2014. He is most widely known for his opposition to immigration, especially Muslim immigration, and has claimed that Norway is a victim of "sneaking Islamization" and that Muslim immigrants are "threatening Norwegian culture".[1] In 2010 he wrote that "we don't believe in multiculture" and claimed that immigration of non-ethnic Norwegians is "idiocy".[2] On climate change he has stated that "I don't believe in the climate hysteria".[3] He believes immigration policy to be the single most important political issue facing Norwegian society.[4] In 2014 he released his book about immigration politics titled Mens orkesteret fortsetter å spille (While the orchestra continues to play).[5][6] In foreign policy he has supported Vladimir Putin and criticized the sanctions against Russia that the conservatives pushed for; he has also said the west should recognise the Russian occupation and annexation of Crimea.[7][8][9][10][11] He has been sharply critical of United States foreign policy prior to the election of Donald Trump.[12] In 2018 and 2020 he put forward Trump's name as a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize; any member of parliament may propose candidates.[13]

The scandals involving Trump date back to before Biden was even a contender and to my knowledge none of them have been "debunked". He was impeached for christ sake. Additionally, I'm not sure where you get your data, but I can't find anything to suggest that Trumps approval ratings have been higher than Obama's at ANY point. In fact, it seems that Trump has never been higher than Obama's lowest rating. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

Which evidence is wrong?

Am I wrong or do you just not understand what I said? You used the Pelosi story as evidence to refute my claim that democrats hold their people's feet to the fire and her haircut has been getting national play for a week. She's getting ***** roasted over it. It's literally the exact opposite of what you were trying to project. In case you need further evidence, look no further than democratic mayors and police chiefs in Buffalo, Rochester, Portland, Seattle, St Louis, etc. They are all being held accountable. This guy also says hello.

You're using a story of someone getting dragged through the mud as evidence of them not getting dragged through the mud?

Stop pretending like you actually care about the sources. What difference would it actually make? We've already seen this president embroiled in more scandals than one can count and regardless of the amount of proof or sources that have come forward, Trump supporters just kick the can down the road and come up with more and more excuses. If the sources were Mike Pence, Steve Mnuchin, and Ivanka, they'd probably just all become libtard liars exaggerating a "joke out of context". If Trump himself was the source, it would become part of his grand plan to subvert the mainstream media. It's amazing how I've never seen a trump supporter hold him to task for literally anything. Say what you will about the democrats, but at least they generally speak out when their people do wrong.

How you want it to be isn't the same as the way it is. Society is making people like that go away, and hopefully they'll soon be gone for good. There's no place for people like him and his supporters in a civilized society.

As a folk/outlaw/country fan, his music sucks and he sucks. Not sure what the loss is here.

I guess even a right wing site isn't radical enough for you? I didn't choose where they authored their expose. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-bulwark/

It has to do with your warped version of history. Trying to equate protesters with far-right authoritarianism is at face value intellectually vacant. First of all, you cannot have fascism without authority, something that protesters against far right extremism completely lack in an organized manner. Second of all, anti-semitism is not distinctly left or right globally, but in America is most often associated with right wing extremist organizations as well as alt-right people who use "soros", "east coast elite"/"hollywood elite", and "mainstream media" as a dogwhistle for "jew". "Jews controlling hollywood, the media, and the banks" were all the prime racist talking points of far-right nutjobs in my youth and in my history books. Since then, the message has shifted but it means the same thing. You want BLM and Antifa to go away? Stop killing people. Stop assaulting protesters. It really is that easy

God you are so clueless. Did you study history in the south? I've never heard you correctly reference historical context. Everything you claim to know is wrong. I'm also not a liberal, FYI.

Things random users on twitter say for $1000, Alex. Nice source.

Referencing kristallnacht on behalf of the protesters of state sponsored fascism drips of irony.

But if they aren't breaking up a riot, then what. If they start the riot, are they terrorists?

And yet the sources were confirmed by Fox and CNN. Who else would have to confirm the information before you'd agree? Is Breitbart the bar, or would they just be a bunch of libtards then? The editor in Chief of the Atlantic is putting his entire reputation on the line for a pretty small story. Does that mean nothing?

I couldn't be further from an anarchist. What I'm going for is you seem to think that breaking a glass is terrorism, but: shooting unarmed people is not terrorism. using chemical weapons on defenseless people is not terrorism abducting people off the streets into vans is not terrorism I just want you to confirm or deny that. It's pretty simple.

Do you not understand why people report things anonymously? Maybe this will help you understand:

So is all of this then: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/police-keep-using-force-against-peaceful-protesters-prompting-sustained-criticism-about-tactics-and-training/2020/06/03/5d2f51d4-a5cf-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html I guess the bar for terrorism has been lowered so far by the far right that it doesn't even exist anymore.

I mean, you cite disreputable sources and I don't know what you expect. It's like none of you ever paid attention in school when they made you cite your sources. You get your news from what amounts to conspiracy blogs and propaganda sites.

not a deflection at all. I'm asking if you believe breaking a glass is terrorism than surely what the protesters are protesting is terrorism. Wouldn't you agree? How can damaging property be terrorism, but hurting and killing people isn't terrorism?

So if breaking a glass is "terrorism", surely shooting unarmed people, using chemical weapons on protesters, and abducting them into unmarked vans is also terrorism? It's also tough to know if any of that ever actually happened. That site has a poor reputation: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pj-media/

That's what I think about anything from Redstate: https://thebulwark.com/why-we-are-quitting-redstate/