Foxx

indy, some peeps are not exactly articulate when expressing themselves, i think you know this. from my perch, i see a only few who express their opinion as omnipotent.

but... the question at hand is whether or not he compares favorably with Brady.

Brady and Rudolph in the same sentance = trolling. apt handle, OP.

my thoughts on this are thus... Foles will never have a higher trade value for the Eagles than he currently does. addiotionally, if the Eagles do not trade him they will get nothing for him as he is a free agent after his contract expires this year. the Eagles also have spoken highly of Sudfield so it might just make sense for them to get something of value for Foles rather than nothing. i think the Eagles are playing the game, they know that the possibility of a Bradford/Vikings situation might arrise again and they could get their asking price. they could also accept a 3rd for him. i am not advocating one way or the other for the acquition of Foles, just merely trying to look objectively at the realities of the situation. it will be interesting to watch what happens with Foles, i do think he is with another team opening day.

he's not Kirk Cousins so......

probably the best argument for.

background

personally, i would not mind seeing the Bills take a flier on Falk at some point.

Maccagnon looking to save his job.

i don't know of anyone else who would compare Allen with Hackenberg favorably. Hackenburg was never thought to be the best like some do with Allen.

+1 agreed. this would be awesome if it could be pulled off.

loomis, Hue will get the most out of Tyrod, no doubt. however Dorsey acquiring him was more of a desperation move than anything else. i'd prefer to look at it from the angle of Beane getting the most from that desperation than anything Dorsey might have accomplished. do you honestly believe that there is another gm that would have given the same compensation?

any bets on whether or not Cleveland's offensive line is lauded for giving their qb the most time to throw the ball?

that will only be because all his receivers are blanketed. they won't be open by 5 or 6 yards.....

and.... another crap thread.

nice!

what about Fitz? do you think he would come back to Buffalo?

an option not yet mentioned is donating the car. donating it, you can pretty much put the price on it you wish. come tax time, you have to fill out a form if it is for more than a certain amount, but if you're legit, you have nothing to fear. take it off the top of your income and you make out in a couple of ways. first, you're doing something exemplary and it might just bring you down a tax bracket. win-win quite possibly.

it might be time to pull up those big girl panties. jus' sayin.......

can't say for sure but i've a hunch the play is for Allen.

#12, Hughes to Indy for the #3 overall pick in the draft.

they're gonna do it, they're really freaking going to do it. we're going to get one of the top QB's in this draft!

Dan is my real first name.

right. it's all a matter of perspective. we were a .500 team before he arrived and we were a .500 team during his tenure. the poster who said we backed into the playoffs is correct, if not for Andy Dalton, it wouldn't have happened. now, if your Cleveland and he plays .500 ball you will view him as an overwhelming success.

they are taking Barkley with the first pick.