Foxx

so then if extrapolated out, you would fire a weapon while stoned, in the right environment of course. out of curiosity, what is, 'the right environment'? what is the wrong environment?

would you recommend firing a weapon while drinking?

perhaps there is more to the story of Talib charging Meadows with racism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CGhxWJTKMU some interesting thoughts and back links here. Lynne Patton: “Michael Cohen turned on the President because Mueller threatened to throw his wife in jail for up to 30 years”… ... Lynne Patton: […] 3) Many of you may already know that I considered Michael Cohen to be one of my very best friends. Countless people can confirm that we were virtually inseparable during my employment at Trump – and that he is, single-handedly – responsible for introducing me to the Trump family and effectively changing my entire life. I would be lying if I didn’t admit that my heart still breaks for him and for his family, with whom I had grown extremely close. 4) What many of you may not be aware of is the fact that I can personally confirm that the ONLY reason Michael Cohen “turned on” the President of the United States is because Mueller threatened to throw his wife in jail for up to 30 years. Period. She is the co-guarantor of a $20M personal loan that Mueller discovered Michael secured back in 2015 by falsely inflating the value of his taxi medallions – effectively making her part & parcel to the federal charge of “Making False Statements to a Financial Institution,” to which Cohen ultimately plead guilty. This is also the reason why Cohen’s longtime taxi medallion partner, Evgeny “Gene” Freidman, was granted immunity. (read more) ...

right. off to your analysis of quarterbacks.

you're right, i have been outed. i am a lesbian trapped in a man's body. i am trying out for the Olympics as we speak...

it's a bribe to buy the next election.

took me a minute, but i got it. :p

let me guess, addadictomy?

calling the Donner Party, table for one. https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/1101348810247282693

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1101277997062152194

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1101294254364733450

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1101375185687597056

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1101301444727242752

seems i am not alone in my assessment. https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1100964102292279298

you got kicked out of the army, didn't you.

this is rich. the obliviousness of it all is cracking me up.

if someone is going to cast their vote solely on the basis of whether or not a candidate is for or against pot, they should not be voting, at all.

i think we all know what they mean by, 'largely'. everyone but us, congress critters, that is.

https://twitter.com/AODowd75/status/1101252251950243842

it was started in TSW and moved down here. but to answer your question, yes.

there are some who argue that it violates the presidential elections clause of article II of the U.S. Constitution.

rats don't do well in that environment. a good percentage of them are there because they were ratted out.

well, if NY joins that collation of states that will commit their EC votes to the candidate who wins the popular vote (i don't know how legal that is but), your vote certainly will matter.

i was thinking this yesterday. it is unfortunate, but unless he is solitary, i think the chances are pretty good he takes one.

by the time it begins to sting, it might already be too late.