yeah, thanks. i understand that. my impression of the tweet, and ultimately his testimony though is that it involved people at the FBI. remember, he was speaking from the scope of his purview. it may have been that he was not allowed to view former employees texts and emails. which even if that is the case, that is somewhat alarming still because those should be property of the FBI regardless of whether or not they are still employed.
i'm taking his testimony that he didn't.