Foxx

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1218675524874059777 from the article: ... House Democrats issued a series of unconstitutional subpoenas for documents and testimony. They issued their subpoenas without a congressional vote and, therefore, without constitutional authority.” “They sought testimony from a number of the President’s closest advisors despite the fact that, under longstanding, bipartisan practice of prior administrations of both political parties and similarly longstanding guidance from the Department of Justice, those advisors are absolutely immune from compelled testimony before Congress related to their official duties,” the letter continued. “And they sought testimony disclosing the Executive Branch’s confidential communications and internal decision-making processes on matters of foreign relations and national security, despite the well-established constitutional privileges and immunities protecting such information.” “As the Supreme Court has recognized, the President’s constitutional authority to protect the confidentiality of Executive Branch information is at its apex in the field of foreign relations and national security,” the letter continued. “House Democrats also barred the attendance of Executive Branch counsel at witness proceedings, thereby preventing the President from protecting important Executive Branch confidentiality interests.” Trump’s legal defense team said that the administration “replied appropriately to these subpoenas and identified their constitutional defects.” “Tellingly, House Democrats did not seek to enforce these constitutionally defective subpoenas in court,” the letter concluded in its attack on the second Article of Impeachment. “To the contrary, when one subpoena recipient sought a declaratory judgment as to the validity of the subpoena he had received, House Democrats quickly withdrew the subpoena to prevent the court from issuing a ruling. The House may not usurp Executive Branch authority and may not bypass our Constitution’s system of checks and balances. Asserting valid constitutional privileges and immunities cannot be an impeachable offense. The second Article is therefore invalid and must be rejected.” ...

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218658024971214850 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218658127358251008 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218658517831290885 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218658747301662721 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218658894811148292 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218668437490356224 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218679116943233024 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218679181736923142 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1218679298334261248

since they would have to replace him, the only way you would save any money would be to sign a player, at his position for less than 2.3mm. i don't think that is happening.

Dems trust the media the most https://twitter.com/TheDaleJackson/status/1218583821685268481

/thread

careful, you do that for too long, you'll end up going blind. oh, wait....

for all you libs, this is where you would be better suited focusing your ire. that this is bad for the environment and climate is after all settled science, of that there is no debate. https://twitter.com/maga_proud/status/1218384735493292032

https://twitter.com/ToscaAusten/status/1218365385466097666

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1218552440183775234

https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1218369134569959424

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1218533503522033665

i'm on the fence here... i can't make up my mind whether this is disgusting or funny. https://twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1218247133637287936

thread. https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1218327011350937602

https://twitter.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1218397066151460864

? brutal happy birthday! https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1218255184171798533

https://twitter.com/Heminator/status/1218281151527342080

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1218264605874708484

ahhh... Casey Anthony's attorney. it's beginning to make a bit of sense now....

ahh man! is this the, anti-dox?

for me, the only question is whether he will be a star right out of the box or will it take him a couple years to get there. i'm leaning towards him being a star right out of the box.

who's his lawyer? Hellen Keller?

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1218226768101945350

Trey raises some good points here. can you imagine Bernie and/or Warren if the trial takes 6 months? ? second tweet though the first is relevant as well. https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1218217284038287365

let me take a guess here tibs,... you are in your late thirties/early forties? when you get to retirement age, you will be thanking the ground Trump walked on.

i keep hearing a lot about witnesses here. you hear the Dems screaming that even during Clinton's Impeachment they had witnesses. this is somewhat disingenuous in that, yes they had witnesses during the Clinton Impeachment but what they aren't telling you is that the only witnesses allowed were ones who testified during the Star investigation. no new witnesses were called. being as precedent is huge, i think this is what the Senate is going to try and adhere to. if there are new witnesses, the House can hear them and if warranted, vote new articles. that is not going to happen though, they merely want to 'Kavanaugh' Trump here. they think we're stupid.