JM2009

So playing TT against this same 3-6 team to maybe get a win, would have been a foolish idea? You know, 6-4 would have looked awful good right now. Now at 5-5, it's all on TT going against KC? Season is done. We will be 5-7. probably finish 7-9. Not when it's the truth. Your cocky posting speaks for itself. You and Maury B used to be a tag team.

One of the main agitators who ridiculed anyone who thought TT was a better option than Peterman. Then for deflection, claim I was happy over the loss.

And you are still doing it. I didn't instigate anything. They posted me stating i was happy for the loss. The same ones that disappeared after wins and were in here bashing TT right after losses.

Newsflash: We are light years away from being a contending team right now. This organization is a mess.

You're happy with this HC right now? And yes, getting to the playoffs would have been a huge achievement. Mcdermott would have been a hero in western NY.

I hated this loss and shut the TV off before halftime.

You didn't answer my full post. Where were you when these same few were/are constantly degrading any poster that thought TT was the better option, and then come in here saying I was happy with the loss.

TT is a serviceable guy who should not have been benched for a rookie when the Bills held the sixth spot.

I said all week that I hoped Peterman would do well because we are in the playoff race with the sixth seed. I didn't agree with the decision totally, but I want to win, know matter who is in there.The people that thought TT was a better option than Peterman were ridiculed with cocky posts all week from the crusader club. Sound advice: you should really just once be a little irritated with them. If your this unbiased poster you claim to be.

Come on. They were 5-4 with TT and had the sixth seed going to play a 3-6 team that could be scored on.

Five picks, which he wouldn't have thrown, led to a lot of points. Nice try. Wasn't the defense an excuse for TT before this game?

lol the crusaders never stop. TT isn't the long term answer but was far from the real problems with this team.

This wasn't his fault.

Because the sixth seed for the playoffs was very much up for grabs. This isn't rocket science here.

Yes we did. 6-4 would have looked nice. I am almost certain there wouldn't have been five picks. You don't put a rookie in against a 3-6 team when you still hold the sixth seed for the playoffs. it was a terrible move. I had hoped Peterman would do well, but look what happened.

I wish he had played well. Wasn't fair to put him in a game like this. Say goodbye to any playoff hopes now.

IF TT is bad, which he isn't, what does that make Peterman? 20-18 is not bad. He was a good fit till better was found.

Bradley Gelber‏Verified account @BradleyGelber FollowingFollowing @BradleyGelber More Hey Guys - I'm starting to doubt the process... #Bills

Weak. Weak, Weak. Ridicule and cockiness all week from your group for anyone that dared to say TT is the better option. I wanted Peterman to play well to stay in the playoff hunt. Now the defense finally comes into play-you mean it's not an excuse?

TT does not stink. But your agenda does.

54-24.

People can have different opinions, but the crusaders were cocky, and nasty to anyone supporting TT. Most are not on here right now. Like xRushx.

Bob Matthews‏ @BMatthewsSports FollowingFollowing @BMatthewsSports More So who syarts next game -- Nathan Peterman or Tyrod Taylor? Does it really matter now? Might as well give Peterman another try. Tyrod won't be here next season. Probably a career break for him.

Matthew Fairburn‏Verified account @MatthewFairburn FollowingFollowing @MatthewFairburn More Maybe Sean McDermott should bench LeSean McCoy to fix this defense.

Truth hurts. Cockiness, and the "funny" posting comes back to bite you at the end. "us"-you mean the crusaders. most seem to be absent.