Bray Wyatt

All I know now is I want some pizza for lunch. A follow up question, do you dip your slice of pizza into bleu cheese? I do

I think Oliver said he could have ran a 4.6 40 if he thought it would have mattered (something along those lines), thats insane

When I was a kid, to prevent anyone else from getting the end pieces, I would make a sandwich with both ends. Was kind of a pain to get the other end, but if I couldnt have it, no one else could lol

You ever make a sandwich with two end pieces??

First, as if those are the only two options lmao. If Trump loses in 2020 it wont be some great awakening on the American public. He won big in the electoral vote, but the margins were very slim in those swing states, and that was the worst candidate in history he was going up against. Second, the democrats, by not having Hillary run, by default should do better. The real question is, how many people has Trump been able to sway since he has been in office and with this booming economy? As for the second or part, stop being so afraid and stop lumping all the people who support our president into one group. The majority of the people would expect him to do as the others before him did (well minus the spying on the party's opposition and the sabotaging of the incoming admin)

Great question, perhaps @Deranged Rhino can explain?

"ankle bracelet" I think is the implication

inkman had me worried, but now you got me hyped! lol

He was there, there was a video of him and Allen working on a possible new handshake

That was Hasek in his commercial??? lol

Didnt Gerald Briscoe beat someone like that for the HC title back in the day? Guy was sleeping and he had a ref come in the room and quietly count out a pin

Lol I heard people saying it would be funny for Bray to win it and then people trying to find out where in the heck the fun house was

I dont believe it became a 24/7 thing until Crash Holly made it that way, but yes same thing essentially

Lol like Bob Uecker in major league, "Heywood's a felon isnt he Monty?.... Well he should be!"

He has the wrong Gruden

I was more curious as to if that meant being able to breathe on its own or not, which it does. The whole nutrients part to me while an issue, wouldnt hold too much weight as a baby still needs to be fed after its born, and there are IV's and things. I have two kids and you think I would have paid more attention to these developmental things when they were happening lol I do think we need to draw a line somewhere on when a decision should be made on when one would be allowed vs not, and as you say with the advances in technology making it more viable for the baby to live outside the womb earlier, the law should then be reviewed every now and then to be updated. Just a quick google search yielded this result on viability: According to studies between 2003 and 2005, 20 to 35 percent of babies born at 24 weeks of gestation survive, while 50 to 70 percent of babies born at 25 weeks, and more than 90 percent born at 26 to 27 weeks, survive. It is rare for a baby weighing less than 500 g (17.6 ounces) to survive. Trying to make a common sense proposal here, it would seem it would have to be something well before 24 weeks when a decision would have to be made. While it is a tough decision, I do not think it should be something that would take that long to make.

I mean I get if they feel it may be a fraudulent one, but for the reason oldmanfan described thats absurd.

That would bother me too, if a doctor prescribes someone something, the job of the pharmacist is to make sure they receive it and the client is aware of any possible interactions, not overrule a doctor.

Thanks for your answer, I wasnt asking it as a leading question or anything, more out of curiosity for someone who has more knowledge on the subject than I. I do have a clarification question on what do you mean when you say "fetus can sustain life on its own" what do you mean by that? As I see people mention that without ever explaining/defining what it means.

Mark McGwire is that you??

What is your opinion then on when life begins?

I like the Joseph pick, if they can reign in his ability he can be a real playmaker for them. Having guys that have just made the transition (from college to the pros) in Milano and Edmunds in the room should help in that regard

Point 1 - This is the crux of the argument for the pro-life people, so even if she wasnt of that belief it would certainly be a tough decision to make. Also, this would back up your point earlier about how an abortion should not be celebrated, which I agree with. Point 2 - was hoping for a little bit more information on this one from you but will follow that up with another question, was it an access issue, affordability, personal choice, religious choice? I tend to find those as the reasons for not, but there are probably more I am not thinking of. Regardless, I would hope that improving access, affordability, (education for personal choice) would help reduce the number that are performed, and ideally eliminate the need for any.

How is it potential life? (Honest questions here hoping to have an open dialogue) You arent stopping anything if its not alive, so any stopping would then mean it was living no? On a side note, were there any reasons for the women you know to have had these to not have had/used contraception?

I am not saying that, but why else would it be a difficult decision?