Jump to content

Logic

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Logic

  1. Oh, you mean Second Christmas?

    I watch at my house, in isolation, with draft guides spread out in front of me. 

    This year, since both ESPN and NFL Network are simulcasting on network TV (I don't have cable), I'll likely switch back and forth during all non-Bills moments.

    Oh...and of course I'll look eagerly forward to the annual "Go to commercial whenever the Bills are on the clock" tradition that BOTH broadcasts subscribe to. For seemingly EVERY OTHER TEAM, we get 3-5 minutes pre and post pick discussing positional needs, scheme fit, etc....but when it's BUFFALO'S turn to pick? Well...everyone knows you go to commercial! Every. Single. Year.

    • Like (+1) 4
    • Sad 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  2. You're absolutely right that the Bills need another pass catching TE. Maybe not so much for this season, but for the seasons to come. Bills want to move on from Clay's big salary and chronic injury issues. Tight ends typically take a season or two to acclimate. Taking one this year makes sense.

    I happen to like the guy the Bills also seem to like: Dallas Goedert, SDSU

    Bills will be bringing him in for a visit. If they still have a 2nd round pick after QB trade-up and if Goedert is still left, don't be shocked if he's the pick. I know fans aren't expecting a high pick to be spent on a tight end, but I view it as being reasonably likely -- ESPECIALLY if they draft a rookie QB. They'll want to pair him with a young QB's best friend: a quality tight end.

     

  3. I said earlier this offseason: Don't be surprised if the Bills draft a quality tight end this year. I think they want to move on from Clay's contract and chronic injury issues after this season.

    With them working out Goedert at TE and Penny at RB, and with there still being a huge need at WR and OG, I'm beginning to think they may draft more players on offense than I would've thought this year.

    • Like (+1) 2
  4. 3 minutes ago, Klaista2k said:

    I hope you are right!

     

    Does it concern you at all that we might not be able to trade into the top 5?

     

     

     

     


    No.

    I think most fans are overestimating the speed at which the QBs are going to come off the board this year. To think that the first five picks will all be quarterbacks is silly to me. 

    I believe that a couple of the consensus top four QBs will fall into the 6-10 range, and that's where the Bills will ultimately wind up trading up and selecting a passer. 

    When draft season started, I wanted the Bills to make sure to procure a top 3 spot. I now think that's probably not necessary.

    Time will tell. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. I think you're safe. I don't see it happening. 

    I simply don't believe that they turned down both Mahomes and Watson last year and then spent all this time and effort offloading talent and accruing draft picks....just to draft the 6th rated quarterback prospect in this class. It doesn't make any sense.

    It's definitely possible, of course, but I don't view it as likely. I also don't think Rudolph will end up being a 1st round pick.

    • Like (+1) 2
  6. It was stated on Twitter that Gaines was exposed in Bob Sutton's 3-4 defense last year, similar to EJ Gaines being exposed with the Rams. He was asked to play a lot of man-to-man coverage, which is decidedly not his strength. He is a big and athletic corner, though, and a former 3rd round pick. 

    I expect him to exceed Leonard Johnson's 2017 production in the slot for Buffalo this year. At worst, he'll be worthy depth.

    Good, cheap, late-FA period signing.

    • Like (+1) 5
  7. 3 hours ago, BuffaloBud420 said:

    We been done that road, a main reason for no success since Kelly. No more undersized or running QBs, that can't stand in the pocket and deliver the ball. Fitz, Taylor, Manuel, Losman, etc. We had the best passing stats with Bledsoe. A traditional QB.

     

    I will be happy with Darnold, Rosen, Allen or Rudolph.


    Welp. I was already rooting for them to draft Mayfield, but this is the cherry on top. 

    Get it done, OBD!

  8. My personal opinion (I don't have any mysterious "sources"): Bills would be happy with Darnold, Mayfield, or Rosen. 

    I don't think they want Allen (they traded out of the chance to draft Mahomes last year, and Mahomes and Allen are very similar). I don't think they want Jackson ("it's a drop back league and I'm committed to that", said McDermott) or Rudolph (they didn't stockpile picks to take the 6th best QB in the class).

    I think they like Darnold's flawless intangibles, Rosen's excellent play from the pocket, and Mayfield's stellar accuracy and leadership abilities. I think they'd be happy with any of the three. I think they'll wait until draft night, see who falls, and trade up to get him.

    I WILL say this...I find the lack of "Mayfield to Buffalo" talk so far to be pretty interesting (a Jeremy White tweet doesn't really count, in my book). We've heard high placed "sources" stating interest in Darnold, Allen, and Rosen. We've even recently heard Lamar Jackson talk. But the silence around a Mayfield-Buffalo connection has been deafening. Not only that, but Beane recently, when asked about QBs, mentioned the importance of "does a team rally behind a guy?" and mentioned that Jake Delhomme was a "12 out of 10 in the leadership department". Who does that sound like to you from this draft class? And does anyone but me think that "two-time walk-on turned Heisman winner" would be appealing as heck to a guy like Sean McDermott?! Mayfield is my personal top choice in this draft, and I hope the Bills see things the way I do.

    • Like (+1) 2
  9. Just now, Chuck Wagon said:

     

     

    They won 5 consecutive titles.  He was the starting QB on the last 2.


    True. But notwithstanding the fact that they were a good team before Wentz arrived, pointing out that he won two national championships doesn't exactly diminish my point that Wentz did better against inferior competition than Allen did. I get it: Allen's surrounding cast stunk. But again, so did his competition, and it doesn't seem to me like he did enough to elevate his team or to show that he's anything more than a list of physical traits that don't necessarily add up to a starting caliber NFL quarterback. 

  10. 1 minute ago, Chuck Wagon said:

     

    If Allen played at Oklahoma, with their talent and coaching, I would have to believe the stats would say something VERY different than at Wyoming.  If completion % is really hanging people up, circumstances come into play.


    I mean, fair enough..but while Allen was surrounded by inferior skill position players, he was also playing AGAINST inferior skill position players.

    If a guy comes out of a lesser conference, I want to see that he DOMINATED that conference. Wentz dominated in college. Allen, on the other hand, threw only 16 TDs this season. Not encouraging, given that he was going against all those vaunted Mountain West defenses ever week!

  11. One way or the other, I expect the Bills to draft a rookie QB in the draft next month. 

    Furthermore, it's pretty clear that there will be an open QB competition in training camp to decide who starts. It's easy to just say "I want whoever wins the competition to be the starter!". Well...duh! I also realize that not knowing who the rookie QB will be will perhaps impact the answers to this. Maybe it won't.

    What I'm asking is who would YOU PERSONALLY like to see as the starter at QB for the Bills on opening day? Do you want to see McCarron get his shot? Maybe you think Peterman got a bad rap last year and deserves another go of it in a new offense? Perhaps you think rookie QBs should start from day one and take their lumps? Perhaps you're dead set on a rookie sitting on the bench in year one? So the question is...

    Who would you like to see under center on opening day in 2018 and why?

  12. 5 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

    He’s going to be pretty good imo, for a team with the time and patience to allow him to develop. 


    I respectfully disagree, and will be more than ready to eat crow if I'm wrong. 

    I'll admit to being predisposed to anti-Allen bias by being a Bills fan, and thus being terrified of big-armed, inaccurate QBs who "check all of the physical boxes" but can't actually play QB well. Nevertheless...as pointed out by The Ringer, in all major measurable quarterback performance metrics, Josh Allen ranks DEAD LAST among draftable quarterbacks this year. Dead last. 

    To choose him over guys like Baker Mayfield and Sam Darnold -- who are superior in every statistical category despite playing against vastly superior competition -- simply based on the idea that Allen has a cannon arm and big upside, would be foolhardy and arrogant. I expect it to happen, though, because NFL GMs ARE often foolhardy and arrogant, and they fall into this trap over and over again.

    Again, I recognize that scouting (especially at the QB position) and projecting players into the NFL is a very complex business, and I'll admit if I'm way off on this one. But I don't think I am. Allen terrifies me.

    • Like (+1) 1
  13. I appreciate you posting this article, HOWEVER...

    I cannot for the life of me figure out why any team would share this information, even with it being anonymous. I ESPECIALLY can't figure out why, during the most secretive offseason moment of a very secretive sport, said team would choose to share such sensitive information with such a no-name, rinky-dink outfit. Doesn't make a lick of sense.

    • Like (+1) 1
  14. As pointed out on Twitter this morning, the Browns:

    - Gave up a high 3rd round pick for a very capable bridge QB and immediately named him starter
    - Also signed Drew Stanton (Starter: Tyrod, Backup: Stanton, 3rd/development: Rookie)
    - Have a GM who was involved in the drafting and redshirting of Mahomes and Rodgers
    - Have an OC (Todd Haley) who most recently had success with a big-armed, strong QB (Big Ben)

    No one should be the least bit surprised if the Browns DO, in fact, take Josh Allen. And my, what a Browns-y thing that would be! Here's hoping it happens!

  15. 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

     

    I didn't call YOU retarded, I called the dumbass fallacy of "You miss all the shots you don't take" retarded.  There's a difference.

     

    IF you don't see the difference, then yes, you are in fact irretrievably stupid.


    Even in a post in which you are attempting to clarify that you weren't insulting me, you felt that need to mention that I might be irretrievably stupid. Cool.

    Let me know if you want to talk about football. I have no interesting in carrying on a conversation based on personal attacks.

  16. 28 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

     

    You bolded 14 of 49 names (I would have included Carson Palmer and Vinnie GreenBalls, though, as they had reasonably good careers.)  That's a 3 in 10 success rate. Given that the overall rate at which top-ten picks go to the Pro Bowl (around 50%), that's a significant indication that teams over-reach for QBs in the top 10.

     

    Plus, in this case what's being advocated in this case is moving up to the top 10, which requires the expenditure of additional resources (picks or players).  So basically, the idea is that we should over-reach even more than usual on a 7 in 10 chance of a bust.  

     

    All on the fallacious idea that you have to take all the shots because "you miss all the shots you don't take."  Which is thoroughly retarded - you're using a form of gambler's fallacy to raise on drawing a full house on one pair, because although you probably won't draw that full house, you definitely won't if you don't call and take three cards.

     

    You really are the most misnamed poster ever. 


    Ah, DC Tom. I know I can always count on you to make personal attacks in posts that don't warrant them. Also, it's 2018, maybe you could come up with some form of criticism other than calling things "retarded"?

    I guess I was operating under the mistaken impression that this is a message board built for discussion of topics. I missed the part where anyone who disagrees with you automatically has "retarded" opinions and is illogical. 

    For your original post with the list of names to have any merit, we'd have to compare the success rate (30%, as you stated) with the collective success rate of all QBs taken OUTSIDE the top 10 picks in the past four decades. Want to guess which list has a higher rate of success overall? 

    But forgive me, there I go again, DARING to have opinions that differ from yours, for which I must clearly be illogical and "retarded". Some real mature, high quality rebuttal on your part, as usual.

  17. 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

    Let's list all the QBs picked in the first 10 rounds of the draft since 1980:

     

    1980s:

    Rich Campbell

    Art Schlichter

    Jim McMahon

    John Elway

    Todd Blackledge

    Jim Everett

    Kelly Stouffer

    Vinnie Testaverde

    Troy Aikman

     

    1990s:

    Jeff George

    Andre Ware

    David Klingler

    Drew Bledsoe

    Rick Mirer

    Heath Shuler

    Trent Dilfer

    Steve McNair

    Kerry Collins

    Peyton Manning 

    Ryan Leaf

    Tim Couch

    Donovan McNabb

    Akili Smith

     

    2000s:

    Michael Vick

    David Carr

    Joey Harrington

    Carson Palmer

    Byron Leftwich

    Eli Manning

    Philip Rivers

    Alex Smith

    Vince Young

    Matt Leinart

    Jamarcus Russell

    Matt Ryan

    Matthew Stafford

    Butt Fumble

     

    2010s:

    Sam Bradford

    Cam Newton

    Jake Locker

    Andrew Luck

    RGIII

    Ryan Tannenhill

    Blake Bortles

    Jameis Winston

    Marcus Mariota

    Jared Goff

    Carson Wentz

    Patrick Mahomes

     

    Not an illustrious list.  Certainly not a consistent-enough list that it suggests moving in to the top 10 to select a QB is worthwhile.  Between the outright busts and the number of QBs who ended up moving to other teams and being successful, there's a decent argument to be made for moving in to the top 10 to pick a "franchise QB" to be a losing proposition, as more likely than not he'll either fail or be someone else's franchise QB down the road.

     



    Yes, there are a lot of misses on the list. There are also a lot of hits and a few Hall of Famers. 

    You miss all of the shots you don't take. Yes, the Bills could wind up with an Akili Smith or Jamarcus Russell. They could also end up with a John Elway or Peyton Manning. You've got to fire your gun at some point and hope for the best. Lord knows we've got enough bullets this year.

    • Like (+1) 4
    • Thank you (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...