Jump to content

Bill_with_it

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bill_with_it

  1. Nice thread now this is something worthy of discussion!   I agree.

    1. He keeps in-house stuff in house.

    2. He has learned after the Peterman ordeal that don’t put a player out there if he isn’t ready.

    3. He’s installed a team first mentality.

    4. He’s been able to pull off a pretty good defensive system once Milano gets back and we can get the linebackers to settle in their gaps (run game).

    5. He’s shown he’s not averse to taking a risk that the benefits outweigh the ramifications.

    6. He recognizes good defensive talent.

    7. He allows the offensive coordinator to call plays.

    8. He seems as if he would do anything to take care of his players.

    9. He lets the referees have it when they deserve it.

    10. He truly believes the team he coaches has a shot every week and isn’t afraid of any team.

     

    • Like (+1) 8
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  2. On 12/27/2018 at 8:02 PM, NewDayBills said:

    Just a random thought, hope I am not violating the tos and I am sorry if I am but I am awfully curious about this topic. Obviously marijuana is banned by the NFL, but I've wondered for quite some time if football players smoke because it relieves symptoms of CTE. Do any of you think this is possible? It would be pretty tragic if the NFL banned a substance that could benefit their players mental health, especially with something as serious as CTE. I know weed helps treat a myriad of illnesses from bipolar disorder all the way down to arthritis and inflammation. Could marijuana benefit players and should the NFL take it off its banned substances list? It would be a shame if the NFL was taking away something that could be beneficial to its players. Do you guys think weed could actually help the NFL? Thoughts?

    As long as josh Gordon’s if the world are content to throw away millions of dollars because of it; showing he’s addicted to it, likely not

  3. 8 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

    Still showed an upgrade on the DL would be welcome. It’s not an elite unit and KW is getting old. Some  elite talent in this draft on the DL so if the slot is right you take it. 

    Granted, which is why these early mock drafts are even more ridiculous. The FA WR crop looks underwhelming at this point, so the writer was likely projecting a bit. 

    A rookie defensive linemen will do nothing for this team until our linebacking core is capable of holding their own. Looking from the perspective of the last game if we had any wrs to catch the ball at all we are still in the game. A rookie defensive linemen even if it was Aaron Donald wouldnt have stopped the patriots from the running the ball down our throats because he isnt filling the three gaps the linebackers are supposed to. So while i agree we need a replacement for kyle in the last game a wr that can catch would have had a bigger impact.

  4. 42 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

    “Experts “ often put drafting for need first.  It makes them look like they know what they’re doing by simply penciling in a team’s greatest deficiency in the first round. Who would argue ? That’s fine for casual NFL fans , but more educated fans know that putting need above all else in round one is a sign of a bad GM. The DL is a draft strength and while the Bills D is their stronger side, Sunday’s debacle vs NEs ground game exposed their D line. It will depend on the exact draft spot, but the Bills should pick a defensive player with their first selection in April. 

    It exposed one de and our linebacking core. Not our defensive line.

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. Just now, DJB said:

    Most of his throws could have been caught today. He had a couple throwaways but the majority of his passes were good. 

     

    The almost INT was his worst pass of the day

    That pass wasnt even what i would characterize as bad; more of a fantastic play by a defender.

×
×
  • Create New...