oldmanfan

You can. This is just the same old crap parroted time and time again.

You cannot see how his overall game contributed to the win. Who scored the only TD of the game? This is the problem with drafting a young QB. People roast him no matter what. The kid is, actually, a kid. He is learning. Yesterday he showed progress over the Packers game. He threw the ball away several times instead of taking sacks. If you watch him from the pocket, when he has time to set up he actually is pretty accurate, although he need to still work on his shorter passes. He was much more decisive on where he wanted to go with the ball. It seems clear his teammates are behind him. And for the first time in a long time a Bills offense had a last 2 min rally, came down the field, and won the game. I was a Rosen guy myself. But he is struggling as well. He was 10-25 yesterday and almost half his yards were on one pass to a wide open guy downfield. And if I were a Cards fan I wouldn't roast him either. Although I'm sure some are there. The four QBs drafted early round one are doing just what you'd expect. Developing. Some good some bad. They all won games yesterday. Good for them.

Read Breer's article today on si.com.

He us doing fine. Yesterday he threw the ball away when he needed to, didn't force things. He's showing growth and learning from game to game. He makes accurate throws when he has time in the pocket. Those saying he's terrible and can't improve are clueless and desperately trying to justify their preformed opinions.

Yes he did. His was an autocratic culture. Not all cultures are the same.

X 2.

When you offer a reasonable argument I'll be happy to discuss. All you're doing is barking at the moon. As an example when you say all health care folks do is rip off patients it is not only wrong and insulting but completely ignorant

Sounds good. Later than I would have liked but good to have a veteran around

Want me to share Buddy's quotes saying EJ was his pick?

The EJ pick was Nix. This has been battered about for years. Nix picked him.

I've explained it a number of times now. You're too ignorant to understand it.

Dude. You're in Buffalo. Get a beef on weck. Or go to Ted's and get hot dogs. Or wings. A deli sandwich?

You have it backwards. The guys you mention plus guys like Jordan or Bird were immensely talented but bought into the team culture. Bought in so much they led others into buying in. Brady does that now.

Developed it as leader as one of the leaders of my current organization and others. As one of a group of leaders, led by a CEO who gets it. You're right that it develops, butbbecausevthe leaders of the organization are committed to its growth. Why is it no one yet can give me an example of a successful organization without a successful culture? Successful coaches set up cultures that allow for certain behaviors. Your first 5 names are all guys that were controversial but gave their all in terms of play on the field. McD and others can live with that. It's when they underperform and refuse to be motivated like Dareus where you have problems. And even the good guys like the first 5 get let go when they become too estranged from culture. You are making the same mistake others made with his quote. Culture and talent are not mutually exclusive.

And the culture he established allowed him to explain to the team that decision, explain why he did so, admit it was a wrong decision, go back to Tyrod. And make the playoffs. Leaders define the culture for their organization. Successful organizations have leaders that live that culture and hold employees to it. Poor leaders do not; they expect employees to be accountable to the culture while violating it themselves. Such organizations have problems because employees can see their leaders do not believe their own words. Seen it happen on more than one occasion.

I'm one who has lived it and developed it. Your statement indicates you don't have a clue. Instead of blowing hot air, answer the one question I have posed: name one successful organization that does not have a successful culture.

It's me who said the stuff about culture. And you're nuts. Culture defines who you are as a company. No one yet in this board has been able to identify a successful company that does not care about culture. Do you recall the pictures of McD one on one with Dareus on the practice field in preseason? Spending time with him one on one? Don't give me this crap that he went out of his way to alienate him. McD wants players focused on their job. Dareus wasn't. Your highest paid guy on your team can't be that guy. If you are a Parcells you can treat a Lawrence Taylor differently because Taylor was completely there when the bell rang. Dareus wasn't. Woods left as a free agent; he was not "shipped out".

Interesting thoughts here

Leaders define the culture. Employees decide to embrace the culture or not. Those who don't leave. Those who do stay. They tried to get Dareus on board. From Marrone through McD ever coach did, and he kept fighting it. Maybe Coughlin and Marrone (on his second tour of duty with Dareus) finally got it through his head that you either buy in and straighten up or your career is over.

I am still somewhat mystified why we don't have a more veteran QB backing him up or playing right now. But looking ta things in total, I believed as did management that McCarron would be that veteran bridge guy who would take snaps while Allen got ready. So let's say he did, or if now we brought in a Landry or Moore or somebody. We could still be 1-3 or even 0-4. And all we'd be doing right now anyway is calling for them to start Allen. So ultimately it probably doesn't mean more than a few games he would not have played. In the final analysis that probably doesn't matter much to our opinions.

What are you trying to say about him being the anti- McD? You think McVay hasn't established a culture for his team? I highly doubt that. As for fans worrying about their cap situation and lack of picks, the've gone all in on winning this year or next year. Then their team will get broken up, when they have to pay Goff and others. And we'll see what happens to them then. I liked Sammy, wish he were still here. But not at 15 million a year. He's done nothing to support that. And with the Chiefs in 4 games so far he has 14 catches for 176 yards and 1 TD. That's just not enough production to merit the huge contract.

Six of one and half dozen of the other with respect to him playing or not. But I do wish there was a veteran around for him to bounce ideas off of and get input from.

McVay built such a great bridge with Sammy they kept him for one year and weren't interested in resigning him. Dareus has like 9 tackles in 4 games this year. Gordon has played one game in NE and that means Belichick has built a bridge? Watch that"bridge" crumble if and when Gordon screws up again. Oh, and Milano? Defensive player of the week two weeks ago. I think a lot of teams would be happy to have him. Finally, cap space. They made a commitment to get out from under contracts that were weighing down the team. Dareus being the prime example. You don't give a huge contract to a guy half assing it through games.

Blah, blah, blah. How many times does it have to be said they planned to clear cap space and they're doing it quickly? You don't like it. Too bad. Dareus has like 8 tackles in 4 games this year, played like crap with us last year despite the biggest contract, so they got rid of him. You don't like it. Too bad. Yes it was their choice to clear space. Which left them less to pursue FAs. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing. It is what it is.

Got ya