Here's the thing though. They watched preseason. They watched the first game. They evaluate players all through that time. So we have to assume they felt Washington was a liability. Do you then keep him just to say you have 4 DTs? Or do you get rid of a guy not performing?
Based on one game? Honest to God.
I thought they'd be 6-10 last year. They made the playoffs. I think they'll be 6-10 this year. Who knows? They clearly stunk last week but they did in a couple games last year too.
Interested to see how Allen does as well as Edmunds.
A vet QB can help a young QB in the film room etc. A vet WR may or may not be better than a younger WR.
I am puzzled by this move but you're being ridiculous trying to draw this analogy.
They make decisions I agree with and ones I don't. I just don't get all crazy like some around here if they make one I don't like. I also realize they have access to a whole lot more info than I do on which to base their decisions.
i also don't buy into conspiracy theories like guys have to be Christian or they get cut. In that regard it's interesting Kerley went to TCU
I am one who assumed McCarron would be the guy while Allen got ready. Peterman beat him out then threw up on himself.
I hope they will now sign a guy like Anderson.
Again I don't understand the move. But I do think it's funny to watch the reactions. They make it up as they go along, they have no plan....
If there's anything we should know by now it's that Beane and McD think through their decisions. Doesn't mean the decisions pan out.