teef

oh my.

come on 72...the only "facts" you've thrown out is that goff either isn't good, or that he's being coached not to throw to sammy. i'm not saying watkins isn't getting attention, but so what. all top level receivers get that attention. guess what? they also get the production as well. that's what it is to be an elite wr...you're covered, yet you still grab balls and score tds. sammy has been with the rams long enough to develop some chemistry with his qb. maybe you need to watch those games just a bit closer to see why he's not getting balls thrown is way. maybe at some point, it's on sammy. all i've heard about sammy's lack of production is excuses. honestly...it took woods being out for you to think that sammy might finally get some numbers.

you holding?

i'm still waiting for you to know how anything i've said isn't correct. you can tell us to watch the games all you want, but at this point, it's nothing more than a deflection from you for not having enough of an argument to back up that sammy isn't anything but an average wr at this point. you're the one who claims to watch the games, yet you've made comments that you can't back up. by watching the game, do you know that goff is being coached to ignore sammy? it's hard to believe at this point that you've seen anything more than rams highlights. you let emotion override reality when it comes to watkins for some reason.

can you describe me what i wasn't correct about? and again, why do i have to watch the games to have an opinion that sammy isn't elite?

the entire thing is almost twisted.

to be an adult and not cry in every post. if i'm 67 and crying incessantly on a message board...kill me.

you may have officially moved into the worst poster category. really...the race card? it's absurd.

again, you insist on playing the you don't watch the games card because you have no legit argument. you've come up with such ridiculous arguments, that i wouldn't be shocked if you haven't watched a single rams game, and are just saying so to bolster your point. ok. you said i don't have any evidence to my comments. what have i been wrong about? i've mentioned that sammy hasn't done anything to call him elite, and i've made the comment that his production since being in the nfl has been underwhelming. what am i wrong about? i don't think anyone reasonable can argue against these points. since no on reasonable can argue these points, you've literally lied making unfounded comments like taylor is a much better qb than goff, and that goff is being coached not to throw to watkins. you call me out as making comments without actual evidence, yet you make absurd comments like this that are nothing more than nonsense you conjured up. do you not get how posters are reading this and think you're being foolish.

this too.

i wouldn't go back to peterman until they're eliminated from the playoffs.

i'm thankful anytime i walk by a mirror.

what the hell is going on in here? do we need to have a lock in?

i know. it was interesting at first, and now it's gotten a bit concerning. i don't hate sammy, but anyone who's reasonable knows that he's been nothing but underwhelming in his time in the nfl. i think he can do well in the right situation, but with a reputation like sammy's, you'd think any situation is the right situation.

do you want to come to my house?

she's no woahhvicky!

no.

no one tries to stretch a truth like you. i'm sure the rams are super thankful for the decoy. you know why you keep up with the you haven't watch the games argument? it's because you have nothing of substance to actually debate. you have a certain emotional tie to watkins, and it completely blinds you how much of a disappointment he's been. i mean, you actually tried to convince us that goff is being coached not to throw to watkins. do you know how amazingly absurd that sounds? ok. let me ask you this. with the way this year is going, and sammy stays on track with similar numbers he's already put up, do you think the rams will re-sign sammy for 12 mill?

meh.

you really cling onto the, "i don't watch the rams, so i can't have an opinion" thing. i don't need to watch the rams to know sammy's production isn't any where near elite. it's not even impressive. so, if you think sammy will sign to another team for 12 mill, did the rams completely waster a 2nd round pick and a player?

well...why would they pay him 12 mill a year (a number you used) to keep a guy they don't throw to? wouldn't you just move on?

no you're just whining for the sake of whining. come on now.

stays healthy and no increase in production?

nice. woods has to be out for watkins to be able to get any production. that's the sign of a elite wr. also, before you were saying if watkins just stays healthy, he'll get 12 mill. now you've at least added an amendment that there has to be some production involved too. good for you. no. i'm not going to watch the la game. if i can watch bc play on saturdays and a the bills on sunday, i'm lucky. sammy's production shouldn't be dependent whether or not i watch. or do you want me to watch to see how a hall of fame decoy plays?

Why would watching a Rams game change my opinion? Sammy wasn't elite here, and he's not elite in LA. High end receivers put up production. Sammy hasn't. I don't know why this is hard to understand. You've thrown out more absurd excuses than I think you realize. Again, I think Sammy is a good wr, but you value him far more than he's ever shown to be worth. LA will have to make a business decision. If they give him 12 mill a year, they'really fools.