teef

Great post boatdrinks. Completely agree.

and i wouldn't be surprised if the 1 cb was on him, or even if he was double teamed on occasion. it's shocking that someone is using that as an argument.

so what if he's double teamed? you think he's so elite...should't he still be showing some numbers? i don't think i've once seen anyone call him a scrub on here. his problem is he was a me first player, (as he even admitted) and even then his value wasn't there. you know who's worth the money? productive players. sammy hasn't shown himself to be one. what's it going to take for people to realize that letting sammy go was likely a wise decision? will have have to be non-productive on his third team for people to actually clue in?

his injuries are still part of the problem. i don't care why he has a lack of targets or a lack of production. it's on sammy. he's even been arguably been put into a better situation this year, and he still can't get it done. i think he has it in him to be great, but at some point he needs to own this.

watkins was absolutely inconsistent. you mention dropping balls and running the wrong routes, but that's not what i'm referring too. i'm talking about straight up production, or lack there of from sammy. you want to blame in on the coaching? go right ahead, but sammy has been on two teams now, and has yet shown to be elite. at some point the excuses from posters have to stop. woods was a solid wr for the bills, but in no way should the bills have given him 8 mill a year. i appreciate what he's done for la, but no way. and what's with the "how many rams games have i watched"? enough with that nonsense. i don't need to see any to know that watkins has so far been a failure there. has woods be good...sure, but in my mind not 8 mill a year good. i'd much rather have benjamin for that money. i really don't think you even care about these specific players. you're still in that nonsense mode that the bills are letting these guys go because of money, when it's clearly not the entire story. at least you started bringing up gilmore as an example. he would have been a huge mistake for the money. keep letting your anger cloud the reality of what's happening. sammy's lack of production is no one's fault other than sammys. woods seems to be getting the ball fine enough. why can't watkins? you're elite.

his argument is just poor. at some point, the numbers are unavoidable. if he was so elite, it would have been seen by now. he's not.

so again, you're doing nothing other than speculating that sammy would have the magically great numbers. he's been in the league long enough that at some point we have to stop blaming his lack of production on everyone else. he just hasn't produced. he has the ability no doubt, but enough is enough. blame it on the hardcore double coverage, but aren't "elite" receivers supposed to over come this? i wouldn't expect huge games every game, but he's done next to nothing while on the rams. goff is getting the balls to his guys enough to win. if sammy can't make himself one of those guys, then so be it. i just think it's crazy that people still assume that if still on the bills, sammy has a big year...with tt. keep trying.

elite? based on what? people just keep saying this like it's a truth. it's not at all. would it have helped to have watkins? of course, but he has shown nothing in his career at all to call him elite, or assume he'd just turn into a star this year. tt isn't the type of guy that's going to put up a ton of passing yards, so i really doubt he would get the production you seem to think he would have. you complain that people are hell bent on defending the fo, but others are hell bent on defending the average play of watkins. blame it on goff all you want, but at some point sammy is the cause of his own problems.

what was said was absolutely true. woods is having a good year, but wasn't likely worth the 8 mill a year he received. watkins has been wildly inconsistent, injury or no injury. just look at his numbers this year. you just can't seem to get over the fact that some of the guys that were moved, were moved for not just financial reasons. if this team is so cheap, why give wood an extension.

or the ever so popular, "same old bills". i know there are some posters who are just itching to say that.

football!

no sammy watkins?

oh...i didn't know you were doing some time in the hole.

the monocle is what pulls the outfit together. i was thinking even maybe a cane, but i don't know if that would get through security.

that's actually an outstanding idea. i'm not going to lie...this hurts a bit. it was to go as millionaires from the 20s...top hats, ascots, tuxes with tails. i think it was because some posters where so attached to how "trashy" the bills games have become, that we wanted to class them up a bit. such a sexy bunch.

anything by bryan adams really.

do you remember what our game day costumes would be if we ever went to a game together?

will do. i know to respect a man's lawn.

i never even thought of that. for anyone who hasn't seen old yeller...everything works out just fine! i can never go back. ever. even if i have to go in for a couple of hours on a friday, i feel like i'm being over worked. also, happy birfday.

were you wearing overalls?

have you ever seen old yeller?

not as long as you don't mind us making fun of you until we see tears.

i'm telling you, the genny products have been on point lately. the beers they have on tap at the brewery are really good. if you come up from the filthy south, i'll break out the good stuff.

i haven't had rolling rock in some time. they go down pretty easy...not a bad call.

we always start with a good beer or two, and then go light city. not bud light, but i've been on a genny light kick.