teef

uhhh...couldn't this be twisted back around on you. weren't people pooping all over harvard a few months ago, and now they suddenly believe what comes out of that school?

who the ***** is talking about covid. we're talking whether there's an actual link between tyelnol use in pregnant women and autism. you can actually contribute to the conversation or pull this nonsense again. it's typical.

i agree. pregnant women really shouldn't take anything the absolutely don't need, but this has been the case now for as long as i can remember. i agree about trump, but he's not just a regular citizen. his words go a lot farther for some people than others, and we all know there are going to be people out there who are drawing immediate conclusions without any real knowledge. it can be dangerous, but i agree that this hopefully and more than likely won't change much.

it sure was. go back and read...and not to get caught up about harvard. there's something very strange about how this admin is going about health care, ( and i'm sure not suggesting covid was handled the correct way) but the cdc director who trump appointed was fired. shortly there after a hand full of higher ups walked off in protest. doesn't this raise an eyebrow to you at all? jfk is not wrong on everything, but i'd trust any proven medical association before i trusted him.

snark? i was being serious. a few months ago a certain group was blasting anything that came out of harvard, and now that same school should cause us to be concerned. i'm always concerned about new health info, so if it needs to be looked at so be it. that being said...nothing is new. physicians across all specialties are blasting the news as having no real foundation.

so harvard is ok now? interesting. i'm always for looking into if there's any real correlation or not, but i'm going to go with the recommendations the academy of obstretrics , academy of peds, etc who haven't backed this at all. it it worth looking into? sure. do i think it's anything at all other than confusing some people? yup. but as far as i know, there's no new evidence that makes this conclusion. if i'm receiving this important info, i want to hear if from clinicians that deliver treatment every day and have actual background on the info. i think it's more than just changing the label. i've already seen post or parents saying it all makes sense now. no it doesn't.

of course there is. people just need to make their own risk/benefit if certain medications or chemicals are worth any potential risk. i do agree with certain points that jfk had. he feels that a lot of our public health concerns have to do with processed foods, plastics, dyes, etc, and i'm totally on board with that. we're not perfect in our family, but we do try to limit that as much as possible. when it comes to linking tylenol to autism i'm out. i haven't found anything new and necessary to make that claim, so i would really like to know why this is an issue suddenly.

my question is why now? is there new evidence that shows there is a possible link? it's been the standard for pregnant women for 20 years so what's changed?

what? i was just referring to how you know thought this was yet another conspiracy.

i was just more amazed that you believe what you posted.

and? darvo tactic bro!

lol. The amount of mental time people give to Kimmel around here is fascinating.

the small part i saw yesterday was when rubio was speaking. the first thing i though of was how presidential he was.

I can’t wait to cut a hole and put that puppy in the microwave.

Settle down.

thank you. yeah...disney didn't like her comment so they canned her. it happens.

of course. my point was she wasn't fired because of her politics in general as the post made it seem like. she made a specific comment on twitter that her employers didn't like so they canned her. that's life.

if i remember correctly, gina carano made the comment along the lines of being a republican was like being a jew in nazi germany, (don't quote me on that) and disney didn't like that because the rumors of being nazi sympathizers back in the day.

cakewalk *****!

i don't think the shooters in either city were down played. i saw everything play out on common media. there didn't seem to be any question who they were to me at least. i also go to eastern universities for continuing ed. i see run of the mill common campuses. maybe we see completely different things through our own lenses. i'm not denying it exists at all, but i think were giving some college kids far too much credit on their political motivations. my head isn't in the sand over it, i just don't feel it's at the point were universities are programing their students in droves.

of course you can post more. you post them constantly. do you realize your one of the top posters on this forum because you post like a maniac every day. i'm not telling you not to, but you're the exact type of person who consumes all day, from a directed feed, made specifically to agree with out. i don't blame social media, i blame people that don't understand what they're getting. do you really think this takes up a large portion of campus life? i guarantee it doesn't, but you sure don't realize that because your reality on college campuses is what's being pumped into that brain of yours. you know why most media outlets including fox news won't show this? it's not hardcore news. it's fringe news that you want to consume. i've heard on here about how colleges are a scam...how colleges are programing anti-americans, etc. it's the great dumbing down of america. just because you find news that fits your narrative, don't assume that other can't find proper news on their own. the adults are talking.

i completely understand what your opinion was. have at it. i also have the opinion that many on here are easily played by what they consume, even at the smallest level. that type of talk is never good, but the fear you have over it is unfounded to me. you'll be fine.

the entertainment industry has always been on the blue side. it really doesn't mean that much to me as long as the politics are kept at a minimum. when it's the heavy basis for comedy of a show, it looses me too. i'm also not someone who refuses to watch a movie because of a political view of an actor. i have no idea why that bothers anyone. your last paragraph is the big one. there's definitely a resistance, and feeling of no because it's trump. i get it, but much of that was trumps doing over the years. i just don't remember this level of anger concerning politics. i'm not blaming it on trump, but i will call him out for leading this country out from it. when he addressed the kirk murder, he immediately started attacking and calling out the other side. not that he wasn't in the right, but maybe it's time to be a leader. maybe it's time to temper all of this back, and unify this country. he didn't...at all. as much as liberals play that no because of trump card, the maga group blames every one of their own mistakes on the left boogey man. common sense has been thrown out the window on both sides, and we need someone to help walk this country through this imo. see what i mean? how much of this do have to sift through a day. you have a directed feed that pumps you full of this. you don't think that's on purpose?

then explain it to me. i'm trying to run a business here. this board isn't my main priority. that's fine we disagree. you think one poster on a bulletin board is more volatile than i do. wasn't this what it's all about? but the moment you start calling people out for the side they're on, it becomes a joke to me.