HappyDays

I'm sorry but even if true that is not enough to account for the difference between their defensive performance and ours. Also what makes you say Stingley is that good? FWIW Benford and Jackson are both rated higher than him by PFF.

Every single time the red zone channel has shown a big Browns defensive play or 3rd/4th down stop, there is a flag on the Browns defense. I'm not exaggerating. It's happened literally every time I've seen that game.

Who do the Texans have on defense? The Seahawks? They managed to stop the Bengals from moving the ball up and down the field.

Watching the Texans game, they give Stroud a moving pocket and they're scheming wide open throws to WR3s. They create open rushing lanes for Singletary. Bobby Slowik is moving up my preferred head coach list. Learned under Kyle Shanahan and now leading an offense that produces well above its talent level. He has CJ Stroud playing confident and fearle

No he wasn't?

He's their backup RB. Pierce is out today so he's getting full time starter snaps.

We have called shotgun goalline runs 500% more often 🤣

When players like Moss, Singletary, and Teller go on to play much better for other coaching staffs, that isn't on Beane.

Texans just used Singletary as a 1st read on a pass play which became an 11 yard gain and then ran him around the edge for an easy TD. Every time the Bills don't play on Sunday I'm reminded of what great coaching looks like.

No IMO. Texans are a wildcard threat and we've already lost a tiebreaker to the Bengals so we want them to win out.

Difference is their defense has now forced 4 consecutive 3 and outs, and their RB1 has 89 rushing yards. The Texans aren't as talented as us even with our injuries, it just doesn't make any sense.

Already at 89 yards with 10 minutes left in the 3rd quarter. And by the way I still think Singletary is just a fine RB. Scheme and blocking are making it happen.

Josh Dobbs is one of the best stories in football right now. Really fun to watch.

I can't believe I'm saying this but the Texans are a wildcard threat for us. Their remaining opponents: Cardinals Jaguars Broncos Jets Titans Browns Titans Colts

DEVIN SINGLETARY already has 59 yards rushing against the Bengals. Who here can name most of the players on the Texans OL without looking it up?

Injuries have obviously been an issue on defense, but so has coaching. That is undeniable. We didn't give up 29 points to the worst starting offense in football because Matt Milano is on IR, it was because of awful game planning and play calling. Other defenses are able to be better than a bottom 5 defense without a roster full of superstars. The Chiefs lost Nick Bolton at LB, they have no edge rushers to write home about, and they managed to hold the Dolphins to 14 points and score a TD, which is even better than what we did against the Dolphins when our defense was fully healthy. And the Chiefs offense didn't exactly put them in good positions throughout that game. So yeah the Chiefs and Bengals injury luck on defense has been better, but the coaching discrepancy between us and them is even larger.

The stats shown at the beginning are an indicator of bad defense and special teams. Like 5th best in TDs per drive since week 5, but only 18th in total points over that time span, that is clearly a time of possession stat. As Brett Kollmann points out, field position is another huge issue. Our offense has a middling run game and only one elite pass catcher, and it's being asked to execute perfectly on long drives with very few opportunities for explosive plays. That is not a recipe for success. Good analysis of the run game schematic issues too. @HoofHearted pointed out that 2 of our 8 called runs versus Cincy featured a schematic flaw that literally drew the defender to the spot where they made the tackle. And unfortunately I don't think the myriad of factors causing these issues are fixable at this point in the season. Pretty much our only chance of sustained success against decent teams right now is everyone on offense executing perfectly throughout the game, and that is just not a realistic ask.

What do you think causes this? I imagine that reading if it's man or zone is usually pretty simple, especially for Josh Allen who's been in the league for 6 years now. Did Lou Anarumo disguise that snap well? Did Allen just misread the coverage, or maybe had the play wrong in his head? Curious what your opinion is on this. Yeah the script has definitely flipped. When we had Diggs, Beasley, and Brown in their prime we were unstoppable against man. But Allen had trouble diagnosing zone defenses at that time, especially zone blitzes IIRC. Now he's figured out zone but we don't have the personnel or the schematic genius to beat man. Maybe someday we'll put it all together and finally see the best possible version of Josh Allen...

So I get what you're saying that there is no inherent schematic advantage there. But if you look at his 2023 splits... https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/A/AlleJo02/splits/2023/ ...he is performing much better in play action. -127.3 passer rating and a 1.7% sack percentage in play action -93.3 passer rating and a 4.5% sack percentage in non play action. So something is going on there. I notice that his under center passer rating is 130.7 and his shotgun passer rating is 93.8. I would guess most of our play action comes from under center. So maybe it isn't about play action at all, maybe that's just a correlative positive stat to under center passing? One theory I have had is that Allen is more in rhythm and comfortable throwing the ball in play action and/or from under center. It might not be a schematic advantage at all, but is it possible that Allen for whatever reason simply peforms better when going through that mechanics cycle?

Sounds like a coaching issue, yes? We talk a lot about player execution versus coaching on here, but it seems to me that the former is following from the latter. I don't believe, for example, that a seasoned veteran like Micah Hyde would be making errors like that on his own if he was being prepared the right way. Similarly I don't believe Josh Allen would take a 1v1 deep shot to Deonte Harty if he was being prepared the right away. I think on both sides of the ball there is a big lack of detail from the coaching, and a lack of understanding of each player's strengths/weaknesses, and this is leading to many of these errors that we attribute solely to player execution.

This is what I come back to every time I consider the idea of firing Dorsey. Even in a best case scenario that is just a band-aid. If we bring in an OC who schemes up an elite offense, he'll be a head coach somewhere else a year or two later. And we won't get the best possible OC to begin with because that OC will be already be a head coach somewhere. So the only real solution to getting a great offensive coach for the long term is to replace McDermott with one.

Our offense absolutely isn't built for shootouts IMO. Shootouts require explosive plays, not ball control and trying to get into manageable 3rd downs. We have no YAC specialists, no deep catch specialists, very few explosive runs. A lot of our TD drives are 10+ plays long which requires perfect execution more often than not. That is not a shootout offense. If you look at the overall investment of draft picks and free agency spending over the past couple years, our team in theory should be built on the defense and special teams making big plays and winning the field position battle while our offense slowly builds a lead before piling on at the end. That's the style of complementary football that won us blowouts in weeks 2-4. Since then the defense has fallen off a cliff and the clearly undermanned offense just isn't built to go on non-stop 75+ yard TD drives and build up enough of a lead to let the defense off the hook at the end. Our team is built to win games like the Chiefs are winning games this year, but it just isn't happening that way.

It sucks because the route he ran to get open was elite: The past couple games he has become the clear #2 in this passing offense. Next step is make Shakir the #3 and I think we could have something here.

It's a fair point. The difference is those other teams you mentioned have good to great defenses. We have one of the worst defenses in the league so our offense is being pressed into shootouts. So that reality means every piece of the offense is going to be scrutinized.

I don't know if I would go that far. As bad as it looked at times, if not for the Kincaid fumble I believe we would have punched it in the endzone there and gotten back within one score with plenty of time remaining. It took us way too long but I think our offense figured it out in the 4th quarter. The next time we play them I hope we stick with what was working.