SouthNYfan

So you're saying we worked a deal with the Giants for #2 that also involved is first trading into the #12-14 slot, and we had to do that without giving up our #22 pick, or any other draft capital? Jesus Christ you people really reach.

I heard Matt hasselbeck might come into try out I think we still have Vince Young's# too

Joe Webb package.

Eagles want better than a 1st AND a 4th for Foles. This has been said like 100000 times. They don't want to budge. I don't know why people keep slinging Foles' name like he's gonna be cheap, or even an option, because of Beane gives up that for him, he should be drawn and quartered.

I'm sure they wanted a 1st and a 3rd for him, and the Cards' GM laughed himself into a heart attack, which was why the assistant GM panicked and signed Sam Glassford

Yeah, or they have an automatic mod review for posters with "less than X" posts/likes/days on forum

So explain how they "probably worked something out at the combine" yet nothing happened yet?? Or how Buffalo traded with Cincinnati to move up to #12, if the Giants deal had already been worked out? I swear to Christ people don't even think before coming up with speculation anymore. I heard we needed a fast janitor.

Adam Savage, "myth busters NFL EDITION" incoming. (Seriously though, one less bad QB we might sign, I'm glad)

What? Go home, you're drunk. I didn't see you explain anything.

The price would be huge. If they don't think he's healthy long term, then why would we want to give up anything for him?? If they think he is healthy, then he's not available. It's simple, really it is.

This has his hashed out numerous times. If the colts think his arm is healthy, then he isn't available, at all, period. IfLuck is available, it means the colts think his arm is shot, so why would you want him at that point? #lockthethread

I agree I think they go Barkley then QB @#4 , unless as I said, they love Jackson, and it's silly to take him at #4 when you could get picks and get him later

There is zero reason to believe the browns are "locked in at QB" for #1. Is it a possibility? Sure, it always has been. There are headlines with the Hyde signing that they are still very much high on Barkley @#1 and after what the saints did last year with Kamara and Ivory, there is a precedent set for them to take Barkley and run both backs. Hyde is going to turn 28 next season and still has yet to break 1,000 yards. They didn't sign prime Barry Sanders, what they signed is a very solid RB who can share time with Barkley and not burn out the rookie from day 1. Again, nothing is certain, but to say they are now "locked in at QB with the #1 pick" is completely wrong. They most likely will go Barkley at #1 then either QB @4 or trade back (maybe with us) to get extra picks, then take a later QB (maybe they like Jackson and will take him at #12 or #22 if they trade back with us)

He learned to focus his hate, like a sith

I'm laughing so hard right now.

It would be very brownsey to draft Lamar Jackson #1 to have tyrod teach him though, right? ?

I think they still draft him Look what the saints did with double RB last season

Brees was a physical concern, with Rivers behind him in waiting. Different situation.

I like how he blatantly ignored your post

Completely obtuse and ignorant statement. NO rookie knows the ins and outs of being an NFL player prior to arriving into the league. Just like nobody knows exactly how to preform all aspects of a new job when they first start, and can always learn something from a more experienced worker.

Mistakes can be made.

Favre was a complete d*ck to Rodgers. He literally did nothing to help him. Rodgers was public about it too.

Can we stop with the Foles talk? I will say it again in this thread: Philly has openly b stated that they want more than what they got for Bradford, which was a 1st and a 4th, and if they don't get their price, they will simply keep him as insurance to Wentz. He's on a very team friendly deal, and they've already moved salaries around to get back to the cap. If we trade even a 1st for Foles we are morons. More than that? Even bigger morons.

Right? Oft injured slot receiver who looks a lot better with a HoF QB throwing him the ball. Sounds right up the Pats alley for WRs. Re-sign Welker? Nah let's just get amendola. Re-sign Amendola? Nah let's get Jordy. It's like plug-n-play with the Pats.

I mean... A bad QB doesn't mean he's a bad evaluator Just like a good QB doesn't mean he's a good evaluator AJ could be great He could be Rob Johnson 2.0 I have zero input on AJ, I truly haven't watched enough of him to make a guess